Skip to main content
Log in

The European challenge to Bismarckian diplomacy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Politics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Middle East crisis is strongly challenging the principles of classical diplomacy, which this paper has identified as a ‘Bismarckian diplomacy’. The Palestinian, Iraqi and Afghan conflicts are bearing upon international relations, in a way that highlights the inefficiencies of a diplomatic orientation centred on power and military force. These transformations shed lights on the roots of Bismarckian diplomacy and its main components; they make clear its Weberian affinities and the controversial distinction between a Weberian approach to International Relations and its ‘Durkheimian challenge’. This paper will delineate the main features of this new ‘Durkheimian diplomacy’, its social orientation, and the emphasis it confers on the social dimension of conflicts in the Middle East.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. With the expression ‘the Muslim state’, we refer here to states that function in the context of Muslim, and in particular Arab, societies.

References

  • Aron, R. (1973) Peace and War. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badie, B. (2004) L'impuissance de la puissance. Paris: Fayard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourgeois, L. (1910) Pour la Société des Nations. Paris: Fasquelle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgat, F. (2007) L'Islamisme en face. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesterman, S. (ed.) (2001) Civilians in War. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesterman, S. (2004) Virtual trusteeship. In: D. Malone, (ed.) The UN Security Council: From the Cold War to the 21st Century. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffield, M. (2001) Global Governance and the New Wars: The Merging of Security and Development. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1933) The Division of Labor in Society. London: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G. et al (2001) Responsibility to Protect: Report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty. Ottawa, Canada: International Development Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halper, S.A. and Clarke, J. (2004) America Alone: The Neo-conservatives and the Global Order. Cambridge,NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, M. (1999) New and Old Wars: Organized Violence in a Global Era. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kissinger, H. (1994) Diplomacy. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolson, H. (1939) Diplomacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pichler, H.K. (1998) The godfathers of ‘Truth’: Max Weber and Carl Schmitt in Morgenthau's theory of politics. Review of International Studies 24 (2): 185–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Rochau, L.A. (1853) Grundsatz der Realpolitik. Frankfurt, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rougier, B. (2004) Jihad au quotidien. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamé, G. (ed.) (1987) The Foundation of the Arab State. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, P. (1999) For diplomacy. International Studies Review 1 (1): 33–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C. (1990) Coercion, Capital and European States. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1968) Economy and Society. New York: Bedminster Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkler, H. (2005) Histoire de l'Allemagne. Paris: Fayard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zubaida, S. (1989) Islam, the People and the State. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bertrand Badie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Badie, B. The European challenge to Bismarckian diplomacy. Int Polit 46, 517–526 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2009.18

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2009.18

Keywords

Navigation