Skip to main content
Log in

Can a Funding Council be a Proxy for Price Competition in a Competitive Market?

  • Article
  • Published:
Higher Education Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this short discussion paper the question of whether a buffer organization can be a proxy for a competitive market is addressed in the context of the replacement of the University Grants Committee in April 1989 by the Universities Funding Council, the abandonment in November 1990 of its competitive price bidding exercise for funded student places and subsequent developments in the United Kingdom. It is concluded that a buffer organization cannot be a proxy for a competitive market, and that funding councils are more appropriate bodies when a government wishes to establish vertical quasi-integration. Competition for Funding Council-funded student places should be student demand, course quality, and institutional mission and efficiency led not through competitive price bidding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sizer, J. Can a Funding Council be a Proxy for Price Competition in a Competitive Market?. High Educ Policy 5, 27–29 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.1992.44

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.1992.44

Navigation