Skip to main content
Log in

Implications for brokerage firms’ financial disclosures: From CSR perspectives

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Financial Services Marketing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Given the importance of transparency in today's financial environment, it is surprising that limited research has examined investors’ attitudes toward brokerage firms’ financial disclosures and how their attitudes toward brokerage firms’ financial disclosures influence subsequent responses such as perceived trust and attitude toward brokerage firms. Research on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) practices and the Social Contract Theory suggests that investors may put a relatively high value on brokerage firms that practice financial disclosures responsibly. This research probed the relevance of this assumption by testing the relations among investors’ attitudes toward brokerage firms’ financial disclosures, attitudes toward CSR practices, perceived trust toward brokerage firms, attitudes toward brokerage firms and behavioral intentions toward brokerage firms with a survey study. The study used brokerage firms’ financial disclosures in general as the focus of this study's survey questions and a convenience sample consisting of investors. The results suggested that investors’ positive attitudes toward brokerage firms’ financial disclosures positively enhanced their attitudes toward brokerage firms’ CSR practices and perceived trust toward brokerage firms, whereas investors’ attitudes toward brokerage firms’ CSR practices mediated their attitudes toward financial disclosures to enhancing their perceived trust toward brokerage firms. Moreover, investors’ attitudes toward brokerage firms mediated their perceived trust toward brokerage firms on enhancing their behavioral intentions toward brokerage firms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Mohr, L.A., Webb, D.J. and Harris, K.E. (2001) Do consumers expect companies to be socially responsible? The impact of corporate social responsibility on buying behavior. Journal of Consumer Affairs 35 (1): 45–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torres, I.M., Sierra, J.J. and Heiser, R.S. (2007) The effects of warning-label placement in print ads a social contract perspective. Journal of Advertising 36 (2): 49–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argo, J. and Main, K.J. (2004) Meta-analyses of the effectiveness of warning labels. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing 23 (2): 193–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healy, P. and Palepu, K. (1993) The effect of firms’ financial disclosure strategies on stock prices. Accounting Horizons 7 (1): 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao, J., Yang, Z., Chow, H. and Chee, W. (2004) The determinants and characteristics of voluntary Internet-based disclosures by listed Chinese companies. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 23 (3): 191–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, A. (2009) Interplay of investors’ financial knowledge and risk taking. Journal of Behavioral Finance 10 (4): 204–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, R.S.O., Naser, K. and Mora, A. (1994) The relationship between comprehensiveness of corporate annual reports and firm characteristics in Spain. Accounting and Business Research 25 (1): 41–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, R.S.O. and Naser, K. (1995) Firm-specific determinants of comprehensiveness of mandatory disclosure in the corporate annual reports of firms on the stock exchange of Hong Kong. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 14 (1): 311–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagenhofer, A. (1990) Voluntarily disclosure with a strategic opponent. Journal of Accounting and Economics 12 (3): 341–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, S. and Majluf, N. (1984) Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics 13 (2): 187–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, D.P., Nohre, L., Cheong, J., Stacy, A.W. and Pentz, M.A. (2001) Longitudinal relationship between the alcohol warning and alcohol consumption. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 62 (2): 221–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, A. and Dowding, T. (2010) Effects of visual priming on improving Web disclosures to investors. Journal of Behavioral Finance 11 (1): 11–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David, P., Kline, S. and Dai, Y. (2005) Corporate social responsibility practices, corporate identity, and purchase intention: A dual-process model. Journal of Public Relations Research 17 (3): 291–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, A. (2007) Priming, framing, and position on corporate social responsibility. Journal of Public Relations Research 19 (2): 123–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, A. and Welker, M. (2001) Social disclosure, financial disclosure and the cost of equity capital. Accounting, Organizations and Society 26 (7–8): 597–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, T. and Wogalter, M.S. (1993) Alcohol beverage warnings in magazine and television advertisements. Journal of Consumer Research 20 (1): 147–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, C.C. and Silver, N.C. (1995) Interaction of signal word and color on warning labels: Differences in perceived hazard and behavioral compliance. Ergonomics 38 (11): 2207–2220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frantz, J.P. and Rhoades, T.P. (1993) A task-analytic approach to the temporal and spatial placement of product warnings. Human Factors 35 (4): 719–730.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, D.W. and Martin, I.M. (1994) Intended and unintended consequences of warning messages: A review and synthesis of empirical research. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing 13 (1): 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettman, J.R., Payne, J.W. and Staelin, R. (1986) Cognitive considerations in designing effective labels for presenting risk information. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing 5 (1): 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, S.L. and Wogalter, M.S. (1990) Comprehensions and memory of instruction manual warnings: Conspicuous print and pictorial icons. Human Factors 32 (6): 637–649.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maignan, I. and Ferrell, O.C. (2001) Corporate citizenship as a marketing instrument. European Journal of Marketing 35 (3/4): 457–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M.P. and Manilla, L.S. (2004) The potential impact of social accountability certification on marketing: A short note. Journal of Business Ethics 50 (1): 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanwick, P.A. and Stanwick, S.D. (1998) The relationship between corporate social performance and organizational size financial performance, and environmental performance: An empirical examination. Journal of Business Ethics 17 (2): 195–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polonsky, M.J. and Hyman, M.R. (2007) A multiple stakeholder perspective on responsibility in advertising. Journal of Advertising 36 (2): 5–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, C.B. and Sen, S. (2004) Doing better at doing good: When, why, and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. California Management Review 47 (1): 9–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, S. and Bhattacharya, C.B. (2001) Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research 38 (2): 225–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balmer, J.M.T. and Gray, E.R. (2000) Corporate identity and corporate communications: Creating a competitive advantage. Industrial and Commercial Training 32 (7): 256–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T.J. and Dacin, P.A. (1997) The company and the product: Corporate associations and consumer product responses. Journal of Marketing 61 (1): 68–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balmer, J.M.T. (2001) Corporate identity, corporate branding and corporate marketing-seeing through the fog. European Journal of Marketing 35 (3): 248–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooghiemstra, R. (2000) Corporate communication and impression management-new perspectives: Why companies engage in corporate social reporting. Journal of Business Ethics 27 (1–2): 55–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, A. (2009) Advertising disclosures and CSR practices of credit card issuers. Management Research News 32 (12): 1177–1191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaiken, S., Giner-Sorolla, R. and Chen, S. (1996) Beyond accuracy: Defense and impression motives in heuristic and systematic information processing. In: P.M. Gollwitzer and J.A. Bargh (eds.) The Psychology of Action: Linking Cognition and Motivation to Behavior. NY: Guilford, pp. 553–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, K. and Smith, E.E. (1996) A disconfirmation bias in the evaluation of arguments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71 (July): 5–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T. (1982) Corporations and Morality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, R.M. (1999) Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology 50 (1): 569–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doney, P.M. and Cannon, J.P. (1997) An examination of the nature of trust in buyer–seller relationships. Journal of Marketing 61 (2): 35–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petty, R.E. and Cacioppo, J.T. (1986) Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change. NY: Springer-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N.C. (1995) Marketing strategies for the ethics era. Sloan Management Review 36 (4): 85–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunfee, T.W., Smith, N.C. and Ross, W.T. (1999) Social contracts and marketing ethics. Journal of Marketing 63 (3): 14–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallahan, K. (1999) Content class as a contextual cue in the cognitive processing of publicity versus advertising. Journal of Public Relations Research 11 (4): 293–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grazioli, S. and Jarvenpaa, S.L. (2000) Perils of Internet fraud: An empirical investigation of deception and trust with experienced Internet consumers. System, Man, and Cybernetics 30 (4): 395–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, S.B. and Lutz, R.J. (1989) An empirical examination of the structural antecedents of attitude-toward-the-ad in an advertising pretesting context. Journal of Marketing 53 (2): 48–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judd, C.M. and Kenny, D.A. (1981) Process analysis: Estimating mediation in evaluation research. Evaluation Research 5 (3): 602–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R.M. and Kenny, D.A. (1986) The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (6): 1173–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, A. and Anderson, R.B. (2008) Corporate social responsibility priming and valence of CSR framing on CSR judgments. Public Relations Journal 2 (1): 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Compton, J.A. and Pfau, M. (2004) Use of inoculation to foster resistance to credit card marketing targeting college students. Journal of Applied Communication Research 32 (4): 343–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleaver, J.Y. (2002) The challenges of college collections. Credit Card Management 14: 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, J.I. (1990) Deceptive Advertising: Behavioral Study of a Legal Concept. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, R.R., DeSarbo, W.S., Oliver, R.L. and Robertson, T.S. (1988) Deception by implication: An experimental investigation. Journal of Consumer Research 14 (1): 483–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, J. and Small, C. (1975) The FDA approach to defining misleading advertising. Journal of Marketing 39 (3): 65–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alex Wang.

Additional information

1(PhD, University of Texas at Austin) is an Associate Professor of Communication Sciences at the University of Connecticut-Stamford. His research focuses on integrated marketing communications, information processing psychology, corporate social responsibility and promotion management. He has industry experience in advertising, public relations and electronic publishing in Taipei, Taiwan and in Boston. His works have been published in the Journal of Advertising Research, Journal of Public Relations Research, Journal of Marketing Communications, International Journal of Mobile Marketing and elsewhere. He is also the principal investigator of a grant awarded from FINRA Investor Education Foundation and the recipient of a research papers award from the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, A. Implications for brokerage firms’ financial disclosures: From CSR perspectives. J Financ Serv Mark 15, 112–125 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1057/fsm.2010.9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/fsm.2010.9

Keywords

Navigation