Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Interventionism of voters: district size, level of government, and the use of preference votes

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Acta Politica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the use of preference votes under the open-list proportional representation system in the elections of assemblies at different levels of government. Our empirical analysis focuses on the elections held in Poland, where similar system is applied in elections of councils in three subnational tiers. This setting allows us to test the hypotheses concerning the impact of party magnitude and district size on the usage of preference voting. Earlier research demonstrated that the distribution of preference votes is heavily influenced by candidates’ ballot positions and their personal vote-earning attributes. While the ballot position serves as a cue for less-informed voters in all tiers, we demonstrate that the elections held in smaller constituencies, where voters are more proximate to their representatives, are more personal. This is reflected by the higher chances of changing the candidate order by using preference votes in constituencies characterized by the lower voters per seat ratio. We also find that preference voting matters more when party magnitude is larger. Our theoretical expectations are tested using logistic regression models, accounting for candidate- and list-level effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Since 2014 only cities of county status have councils elected in OLPR system; before it was used also in medium-sized municipalities, counting more than 20 thousands inhabitants.

References

  • Ames, B. 1995. Electoral strategy under open-list proportional representation. American Journal of Political Science 39 (2): 406–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • André, A., and S. Depauw. 2014. District magnitude and the personal vote. Electoral Studies 35: 102–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beblavý, M., and M. Veselkova. 2014. Preferential voting and the party-electorate relationship in Slovakia. Party Politics 20 (4): 521–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bein, H.M., and D.S. Hecock. 1957. Ballot position and voter’s choice. The arrangement of names on the ballot and its effect on the voter. Westport: Greenwood Press Publishers.

  • Blom-Hansen, J., J. Elklit, S. Serritzlew, and L.R. Villadsen. 2016. Ballot position and election results: Evidence from a natural experiment. Electoral Studies 44: 172–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowler, S., and D.M. Farrell. 1993. Legislator shirking and voter monitoring: Impacts of European Parliament Electoral Systems upon legislator-voter relationships. Journal of Common Market Studies 31 (1): 45–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockington, D. 2003. A low information theory of ballot position effect. Political Behavior 25 (1): 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carey, J.M., and M.S. Shugart. 1995. Incentives to cultivate a personal vote: a rank ordering of electoral formulas. Electoral Studies 14 (4): 417–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CBOS (2014). Ranga wyborów samorządowych i zainteresowanie decyzjami władz różnych szczebli. Report no. BS 148/2014.

  • Chang, E.C.C. 2005. Electoral incentives for political corruption under open-list proportional representation. Journal of Politics 67 (3): 716–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, E., G. Simonovits, J.A. Krosnick, and J. Pasek. 2014. The impact of candidate name order on election outcomes in North Dakota. Electoral Studies 35: 115–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crisp, B.F., S. Olivella, M. Malecki, and M. Sher. 2013. Vote-earning strategies in flexible list systems: Seats at the price of unity. Electoral Studies 32: 658–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crisp, B.F., K.M. Jensen, and Y. Shomer. 2007. Magnitude and vote seeking. Electoral Studies 26 (4): 727–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtice, J., and P. Shively. 2000. Who represents us best? One member or many?. Quebec: Paper presented at the International Political Science Association World Congress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darcy, R. 1986. Position effects with party columns ballots. Western Political Quarterly 39 (4): 646–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faas, T., and H. Schoen. 2006. The importance of being first: Effects of candidates’ list positions in the 2003 Bavarian state election. Electoral Studies 25 (1): 91–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flis, J. 2014. Złudzenia wyboru: Społeczne wyobrażenia i instytucjonalne ramy w wyborach sejmu i senatu. Kraków: Wyd. Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gendźwiłł, A. 2015. Skąd się biorą głosy nieważne w wyborach do sejmików województw? Studia Socjologiczne 4 (219): 33–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gendźwiłł, A., and J. Raciborski. 2014. Jak głosują wyborcy w warunkach preferencyjnych list wyborczych: Przypadek polski. Decyzje 11 (22): 47–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geys, B., and B. Heyndels. 2003. Ballot layout effects in the 1995 elections of the Brussels government. Public Choice 116 (1/2): 147–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Górecki, M., and P. Kukołowicz. 2014. Gender quotas, candidate background and the election of women: A paradox of gender quotas in open-list proportional representation systems. Electoral Studies 36: 65–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Górecki, M., and M. Marsh. 2012. Not just ‘friends and neighbours’: Canvassing, geographic proximity and voter choice. European Journal of Political Research 51: 563–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Górecki, M., and M. Marsh. 2014. A decline of ‘friends and neighbours voting’ in Ireland? Local candidate effects in the 2011 Irish ‘earthquake election’. Political Geography 41: 11–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, D.E., and K. Imai. 2008. Estimating causal effects of ballot order from a randomized natural experiment the California alphabet lottery, 1978–2002. Public Opinion Quarterly 72 (2): 216–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jankowski, M. 2016. Voting for locals: Voters’ information processing strategies in open-list PR systems. Electoral Studies 43: 72–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jankowski, M., and K. Marcinkiewicz. 2016. Are populist parties fostering women’s political representation in Poland?. A comment on Kostadinova and Mikulska: Party Politics. doi:10.1177/1354068816650995.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Karvonen, L. 2004. Preferential voting: Incidence and effects. International Political Science Review 25 (2): 203–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, R.S. 1985. Preference voting in Italy votes of opinion, belonging, or Exchange? Comparative Political Studies 18 (2): 229–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley and McAllister. 1984. Ballot paper cues and the vote in Australia and Britain: alphabetic voting, sex, and title. Public Opinion Quarterly 48 (2): 452–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Key, V.O. 1949. Southern politics in state and nation. Knoxville: Alfred A. Knopf Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjaer, U., and J. Elklit. 2010. Local party system nationalisation: Does municipal size matter? Local Government Studies 36 (3): 425–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koppell, J.G.S., and J.A. Steen. 2004. The effects of ballot position on election outcomes. Journal of Politics 66 (1): 267–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, G. 2010. First come, first served: the effect of ballot position on electoral success in open list ballot PR elections. Representation 46 (2): 167–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcinkiewicz, K., and M. Stegmaier. 2015. Ballot position effects under compulsory and optional preferential-list PR electoral systems. Political Behavior 37 (2): 465–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcinkiewicz, K. 2014. Electoral contexts that assist voter coordination: Ballot position effects in Poland. Electoral Studies 33: 322–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcinkiewicz, K., and M. Jankowski. 2014. When there’s no easy way out: Electoral Law reform and ballot position effects in the 2011 Hamburg state elections. German Politics 23 (1–2): 103–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, M. 1985. The voters decide? Preferential voting in European list systems. European Journal of Political Research 13 (4): 365–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meredith, M., and Y. Salant. 2013. On the causes and consequences of ballot order effects. Political Behavior 35: 175–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millard, F. 2014. Not much happened: The impact of gender quotas in Poland. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 47 (1): 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasek, J., D. Schneider, J. Krosnick, A. Tahk, E. Ophir, and C. Milligan. 2014. Prevalence and moderators of the candidate name-order effect. Evidence from statewide general elections in California. Public Opinion Quarterly 78 (2): 416–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, M. 1966. Preferential voting in Denmark: The voters’ influence on the election of Folketing candidates. Scandinavian Political Studies 1 (1): 167–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raunio, T. 2005. Finland: One hundred years of quietude. In The politics of electoral systems, ed. M. Gallagher, and P. Mitchell, 471–493. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reif, K., and H. Schmitt. 1980. Nine second-order national elections—A conceptual framework for the analysis of European election results. European Journal of Political Research 8 (1): 3–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renwick, A., and J.B. Pilet. 2015. Faces on the ballot. The personalization of electoral systems in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, A., B. Reilly, and A. Ellis. 2005. Electoral system design: The new international IDEA handbook. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, T.W., and A.A. Macht. 1987. Friends and neighbors voting in statewide general elections. American Journal of Political Science 31 (2): 448–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shugart, M.S. 2005. Comparative electoral systems research: The maturation of a field and new challenges ahead. In The Politics of Electoral Systems, ed. M. Gallagher, and P. Mitchell, 25–55. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shugart, M.S., M.E. Valdini, and K. Suominen. 2005. Looking for locals: Voter information demands and personal vote-earning attributes of legislators under proportional representation. American Journal of Political Science 49 (2): 437–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thijssen, P. 2013. Are parties stimulating candidate-centred voting? The case of the Belgian district council elections 2000–2006. Acta Politica 48 (2): 144–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Erkel, P.F., and P. Thijssen. 2016. The first one wins: Distilling the primacy effect. Electoral Studies 44 (1): 245–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wauters, B., D. Verlet, and J. Ackaert. 2012. Giving more weight to preferential votes: Welcome or superfluous reform? The case of the local elections in flanders (Belgium). Local Government Studies 38 (1): 91–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Local Development and Policy, Faculty of Geography and Regional Studies, University of Warsaw, Krakowskie Przedmieście 30, 00-927, Warsaw, Poland

    Adam Gendźwiłł

  2. Institute of Political Science, University of Hamburg, Allende Platz 1, 20146, Hamburg, Germany

    Kamil Marcinkiewicz

Authors
  1. Adam Gendźwiłł
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kamil Marcinkiewicz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adam Gendźwiłł.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gendźwiłł, A., Marcinkiewicz, K. Interventionism of voters: district size, level of government, and the use of preference votes. Acta Polit 54, 1–21 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-017-0069-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-017-0069-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation