Abstract
“In 1985, when Mikhail Sergeevich Gorbachev came to power,” wrote A. Motyl in 1990, “the Soviet state was stable by any standard. Party rule was perceived as legitimate, the population was quiescent and generally satisfied, and open opposition to the regime was minimal … [By 1990] the condition of the Soviet state had experienced a 180-degree turn. The Party was thoroughly delegitimized, … the population was in the streets, and open opposition was the order of the day…. Who or what pushed the USSR onto this slippery slope? The answer, quite simply, is Mikhail Gorbachev.”1 Predicting a “breakdown or a crackdown,”2 as extreme variants of political developments, Motyl remarked: “I still doubt that the non-Russians, who may increasingly want to rebel, will be able to do so successfully.”3
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
Motyl, A., Sovietology, Rationality, Nationality: Coming to Grips with Nationalism in the USSR (New York: Columbia University Press), 1990, pp. 187–188.
Copyright information
© 2003 Dina Zisserman-Brodsky
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zisserman-Brodsky, D. (2003). Samizdat and Ethnic Mobilization. In: Constructing Ethnopolitics in the Soviet Union: Samizdat, Deprivation, and the Rise of Ethnic Nationalism. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403973627_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403973627_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-52668-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4039-7362-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)