Skip to main content

Regulating Conflict through the Petition

  • Chapter
Social Identities in Revolutionary Russia

Abstract

The petition considered here was the collective representation by peasants and workers during the second third of the nineteenth century. It was a form of action that atrophied with the Great Reform. The petition was addressed to autocracy, it invoked its might and mercy, it affirmed its law and it denoted craven submission. It accused a mendacious bureaucracy of disfiguring the sublime majesty of autocracy, and it proposed instead another autocracy, in direct relation with the peasantry. It legitimized autocracy rather than challenged it; as such it was one of the latter’s instruments of social regulation. The petition was composed, not by the peasants themselves, but by others who knew or claimed to know the mind of autocracy and the manner of pleasing it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  • Daniel Field, Rebels in the Name of the Tsar (Boston, Mass.: Unwin Hyman, 1989) pp. 9–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. N. Mironov, Sotsial’ndia istorria Rossii perioda imperii (XVIII–nachalo XXV.), vol. 2 (St Petersburg, 1999) pp. 249–50).

    Google Scholar 

  • V. I. Semevskii, Krest’iane v tsarstvovanie Imperatritsy Ekateriny II, vol. 1, 2nd edn (St Petersburg: M. M. Stasiulevich, 1903) pp. 487–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • V. I. Semevskii, Krest’iane v tsarstvovanie Imperatritsy Ekateriny II, vol. 1, 1st edn (St Petersburg: M. M. Stasiulevich, 1901), chs 2–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • I. I. Ignatovich, Bor’ba krest’ian za osvobozhdenie (Leningrad and Moscow: iz-vo ‘Petrograd’, 1924) pp. 39–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurence Sterne, A Sentimental Journey (London: Dent, Everyman’s Library, 1962 edn) pp. 80–1.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2001 Madhavan K. Palat

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Palat, M.K. (2001). Regulating Conflict through the Petition. In: Palat, M.K. (eds) Social Identities in Revolutionary Russia. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403919687_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403919687_5

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-42556-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4039-1968-7

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics