Abstract
By the mid-1980s, a seemingly unstoppable tide of strikes, boycotts and other protests threatened to make South Africa ungovernable, while the international community simultaneously increased the campaign for sanctions. Already weakened by anti-apartheid pressures from shareholders, consumers, and governments in the 1970s and 1980s, and a US Congressional amendment blocking International Monetary Fund (IMF) loans since 1983, domestic and foreign investors’ confidence in the economy plunged in the wake of the state of emergency declared in July 1985. Chase Manhattan Bank decided neither to extend (“roll-over”) credit nor to provide new loans to South Africa. Other bankers and investors immediately moved to switch their funds out of the country, leading the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE) to decline rapidly and the rand to plummet on foreign exchange markets. In an attempt to stem capital flight, the South African government quickly imposed a moratorium on debt repayments to public and private creditors, suspended foreign exchange dealings, and temporarily closed the JSE. As this crisis unfolded, the international anti-apartheid movement called for intensified financial sanctions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
R. Moorsom, “Foreign Trade and Sanctions,” in M. Orkin, ed., Sanctions Against Apartheid (Cape Town: David Philip, 1989), p. 256.
See D. Kaplan, “The South African Capital Goods Sector and the Economic Crisis,” in S. Gelb, ed., South Africa’s Economic Crisis (Cape Town: David Philip, 1991), p. 173;
A. Hirsch, “The Origins and Implications of South Africa’s Continuing Financial Crisis,” Transformation 9 (1989), p. 32.
V. Padayachee, “Private International Banks, the Debt Crisis and the Apartheid State, 1982–1985,” African Affairs 87 (1988), p. 362.
M. Lipton, Sanctions and South Africa (London: Economist Intelligence Unit, 1988), p. 37, based on the South African Reserve Bank, Quarterly Bulletin.
D. Geldenhuys, Isolated States: A Comparative Perspective (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990), pp. 394, 404–5;
International Labor Organization, Financial Sanctions against South Africa (Geneva: ILO, 1991), pp. 25–8.
F. Cassim, “Growth, Crisis and Change in the South African Economy,” in J. Suckling and L. White, eds., After Apartheid: Renewal of the South African Economy (London: James Currey, 1988), p. 8. Lifting exchange controls signified a general policy shift toward liberalizing the economy, upon the recommendation of the de Kock Commission on Monetary Policy (published in 1979).
J. D. F. Jones, “Pretoria Takes Cautious View of Cheerful Economic Atmosphere,” Financial Times, 17 February 1983, p. 3.
D. Woods, Engagement in South Africa: The International Monetary Fund Involvement 1990–92 (Johannesburg: South African Institute of International Affairs Occasional Paper, October 1992), p. 5.
D. Keys, “The SA Government View on Foreign Trade and Investment,” South Africa International 22 (1992), p. 171. Keys later became Minister of Finance.
See L. E. Armijo, “Mixed Blessings: Foreign Capital Flows and Democracy in Emerging Markets,” in L. E. Armijo, ed., Financial Globalization and Democracy in Emerging Markets (Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan, 1999).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1999 Xavier Carim, Audie Klotz, and Olivier Lebleu
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Carim, X., Klotz, A., Lebleu, O. (1999). The Political Economy of Financial Sanctions. In: Crawford, N.C., Klotz, A. (eds) How Sanctions Work. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403915917_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403915917_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-72552-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4039-1591-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)