Abstract
There is a general agreement that knowledge represents a sustainable competitive advantage for enterprises working in turbulent and unpredictable environments (Drucker, 1993; Grant, 1996; Alavi and Leidner, 2001). As knowledge becomes essential, organizations are restructuring themselves in order to better use this valuable asset. The implementation of knowledge management systems (KMSs) has led to the emergence of new organizational forms such as post-bureaucratic and decentralized organizations. In fact, these systems seem to affect the control and the autonomy of organizational actors. On the one hand, KMSs enhance horizontal communication and encourage self-organizing and self-managing teams. They facilitate access to information and contribute to individuals’ cognitive development. Hence, employees have greater levels of autonomy that allow them to better address problematic situations. Besides, technologies are socially constructed. Their use is structured by employees’ interpretation and mental models (Orlikowski, 1996). In this respect, KMSs supported by these technologies amplify ‘uncertainty zones’ (Crozier and Friedberg, 1977) and employees’ autonomy. Additionally, knowledge sharing largely depends on employees’ willingness and engagement. On the other hand, KMSs control organizational actors’ activities through formalizing their collaboration practices and informal exchanges, and increasing the transparency of their work and interactions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alavi, M. & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues. MIS Quarterly, 25, 107–136.
Benghozi, P. J. (2001). Technologies de l’information et organisation de la tentation de la flexibilité à la centralisation. Revue Française de Gestion, 2, 61–80.
Boulay, J. & Isaac, H. (2007). Contrôler les réseaux d’entreprise avec les technologies de l’information. Revue Française de Gestion, 170, 103–115.
Chatzis, K. (1999). De l’autonomie par l’indépendance à l’autonomie dans l’interaction. In K. Chatzis, C. Mounier, P. Veltz & P. Zatifian (eds), L’autonomie dans les organisations: quoi de neuf?, 27–37. Paris: L’Harmattan.
Chiapello, E. (1996). Les typologies des modes de contrôle et leurs facteurs de contingence: un essai d’organisation de la littérature. Comptabilité, Contrôle, Audit, 2, 51–74.
Clergeau, C. & Pihel, L. (2010). Systèmes d’information, contrôle des tâches et management des activités de service. Une analyse à partir de l’exemple des centres de relation client. Systèmes d’Information et Management, 15 (3), 71–91.
Crozier, M. & Friedberg, E. (1977) L’acteur et le système. Paris: Editions du Seuil.
de Vaujany, F.-X. (2006). Pour une théorie de l’appropriation des outils de gestion: vers un dépassement de l’opposition conception-usage. Management & Avenir, 3, 109–126.
Drucker, P. F. (1993). Managing for the Future. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Dudezert, A. (2013). La connaissance dans les entreprises. Paris: La Découverte.
Elie-Dit-Cosaque, C. (2010). Les réponses de cadres intermédiaires face à l’implémentation de technologies de l’information et de la communication: le cas d’une administration publique. Management & Avenir, 9 (39), 213–232.
Felin, T. & Hesterly, W. (2007). The Knowledge-based View, Nested Heterogeneity, and New Value Creation: Philosophical Considerations on the Locus of Knowledge. Academy of Management Review, 32 (1), 195–218.
Gibson, W. J. & Brown, A. (2009). Working with Qualitative Data. London: Sage.
Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 109–122.
Hansen, M. T., Nohria, N. & Tierney, T. (1999). What’s Your Strategy for Managing Knowledge? Harvard Business Review, 77 (2), 106–116.
Leclercq-Vandelannoitte, A. (2013). Travail à distance et e-management. Organisation et contrôle en entreprise. Paris: Dunod.
McQueen, R. (1998). Four Views of Knowledge and Knowledge Management. In E. Hoadley & I. Benbasat (eds) Proceedings of the Fourth Americas Conference on Information Systems, 609–611. Baltimore, MD, Association for Information Systems, August 1998.
Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (second edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation. Organization Science, 5 (1), 14–37.
Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations. Organization Science, 3 (3), 398–427.
Orlikowski, W. J. (1996). Improvising Organizational Transformation over Time: A Situated Change Perspective. Information Systems Research, 7 (1), 63–92.
Orlikowski, W. & Scott, S. (2008), The Entangling of Technology and Work in Organizations. Department of Management, London School of Economics and Political Science. Working Paper Series. 1–46.
Reynaud, J. D. (1989). Les Règles du jeu: L’action collective et la régulation sociale. Paris: Armand Colin.
Reynaud, J. D. (1995). Le conflit, la négociation et la règle. Toulouse: Octarès.
Rubin, H. J. & Rubin, I. (2005). Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data. London: Sage.
Stoycheva, K. G. & Lubart, T. (2002). La nature de la prise de décision créative. In I. Getz (ed.), La créativité organisationnelle, regards sur l’individu, l’entreprise et l’économie, 51–73. Paris: Vuibert.
Verra, G. L., Karoui, M. & Dudezert, A. (2012). Adoption symbolique d’un Réseau Social pour entreprise: Le cas de Bouygues Construction. In 17ème Conférence Internationale de l’Association Information et Management. Bordeaux, France, Mai 2012.
Von Krogh, G. (2009). Individualist and Collectivist Perspectives on Knowledge in Organizations: Implications for Information Systems Research. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 18 (3), 119–129.
Yin, R. K. (1984). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. London: Sage.
Zuboff, S. (1985). Automate/Informate: The Two Faces of Intelligent Technology. Organizational Dynamics, 14, 5–18.
Zuboff, S. (1988). In the Age of the Smart Machine, the Future of Work and Power. New York: Basic Books.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Carine Khalil and Aurélie Dudezert
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Khalil, C., Dudezert, A. (2015). Knowledge Management Systems, Autonomy and Control: How to Regulate? A Case-Study in an Industrial Company. In: de Vaujany, FX., Mitev, N., Lanzara, G.F., Mukherjee, A. (eds) Materiality, Rules and Regulation. Technology, Work and Globalization. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137552648_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137552648_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-55262-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-55264-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)