Skip to main content

Examining the “Tools of the Trade”: A Knowledge Process Approach to Materials Analysis and Materials Evaluation

  • Chapter
A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies

Abstract

Textbooks, audio and video recordings, websites, and teacher-designed worksheets, tasks, and activities represent just some of the many “tools of the trade” for language and literacy teachers and learners. Teaching/learning materials such as these play a pivotal role in the classroom and thus deserve careful analysis and evaluation to ensure that they are engaging, supporting and inspiring learners to the fullest extent possible. One way to do this is to examine the materials for the knowledge processes — experiencing, analyzing, conceptualizing, applying — they anticipate. This chapter outlines a procedure for converting the Knowledge Process framework into materials analysis and evaluation instruments for use within any educational context where there is an interest in a Multiliteracies approach to language and literacy teaching and learning. It also presents a case for the use of knowledge process materials analyses/evaluations at institutions in which there is no intention of implementing Multiliteracies pedagogy.

Knowing is the process of connecting the stuff of the mind to the stuff of the world. Knowing is a form of action and to know in this active sense is to learn.

—Kalantzis, Cope & The Learning by Design Group, 2005, p. 70.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cope, B. & Kalantzis, M. (Eds.) (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. Oxford: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R. (2011). Macro-and micro-evaluations of task-based teaching. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.) Materials development in language teaching (2nd ed.) (pp. 212–235). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J.P. (2000). New people in new worlds: Networks, the new capitalism and schools. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures (pp. 43–68). Oxford: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harwood, N. (2010). English Language Teaching Materials: Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2012). Literacies. Melbourne, Victoria: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kalantzis, M., Cope, B. & The Learning by Design Group (2005). Learning by Design. Melbourne, Victoria: Victorian Schools Innovation Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kern, R. (2008). Making connections through texts in language teaching. Language Teaching, 41(3), 367–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littlejohn, A. (2011). The analysis of language teaching materials: Inside the Trojan horse. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Materials Development in Language Teaching (2nd ed.) (pp. 179–211). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masuhara, H., Hann, N., Yi. Y. & Tomlinson, B. (2008). Adult EFL courses. ELT Journal, 62(3), 294–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masuhara, H. & Tomlinson, B. (2010). Applications of the research results for materials development. In B. Tomlinson & H. Masuhara (Eds.), Research for Materials Development in Language Learning: Evidence for Best Practice (pp. 410–424). London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonough, J., Shaw, C. & Masuhara, H. (2013). Materials and Methods in ELT. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, I. (2002). Materials Evaluation and Design for Language Teaching. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, I. (2013). Teaching Materials and the Roles of EFL/ESL Teachers: Practice and Theory. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • New London Group (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowland, L., Canning, N., Faulhaber, D., Lingle, W. & Redgrave, A. (2014). A multiliteracies approach to materials analysis. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 27(2), 136–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, D. (2011). Interpreting Qualitative Data (4th ed.). London: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, B. (2011). Glossary of basic terms for materials development in language teaching. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Materials Development in Language Teaching (2nd ed.) (pp. ix–xviii). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, B. (2012). Materials development for language learning and teaching. Language Teaching, 45(2), 143–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, B. (2014). Materials evaluation. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Developing Materials for Language Teaching (2nd ed.) (pp. 15–36). London: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, B. & Masuhara, H. (2004). Developing Language Course Materials. Singapore: RELC.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Luke Rowland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rowland, L. (2015). Examining the “Tools of the Trade”: A Knowledge Process Approach to Materials Analysis and Materials Evaluation. In: Cope, B., Kalantzis, M. (eds) A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137539724_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics