Abstract
In this chapter I explore a morally rich notion of solidarity and the relationships it promotes, and in doing so, argue for the role of empathetic understanding in the moral response to civilized oppression. This is a position generally accepted in feminist philosophy, but I introduce two caveats that extend the role of moral solidarity in controversial ways.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Jean Harvey, Civilized Oppression, (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1999), 70–72.
A number of writers have made this point, for example, Laurence Thomas, “Moral Flourishing in an Unjust World,” Journal of Moral Education 22, no. 2 (1993), 87.
Elizabeth V. Spelman, Inessential Woman: Problems of Exclusion in Feminist Thought (Boston: Beacon Press, 1988), 179.
Laurence Thomas, “Moral Deference,” Philosophical Forum 24, no. 1–3 (Fall-Spring 1992), 247.
Sandra Lee Bartky, “Sympathy and Solidarity,” in Sympathy and Solidarity and Other Essays (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2002), 71–72.
Michele M. Moody-Adams, “Culture, Responsibility, and Affected Ignorance,” Ethics 104, no. 2 (January 1994), 291–309.
Paul Benson, “Blame, Oppression, and Diminished Moral Competence,” in Moral Psychology: Feminist Ethics and Social Theory, ed. Peggy DesAutels and Margaret Urban Walker (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2004, 183–200.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2015 Jean Harvey
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Harvey, J. (2015). The Relationship of Moral Solidarity. In: Calcagno, A. (eds) Civilized Oppression and Moral Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137498069_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137498069_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-50600-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-49806-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)