Abstract
Temporality may be understood as a box of speeds or gears; each human society possesses such a multi-geared orientation to present, future and past. Just as each civilisation has its own nomos or orientation to space, so it can be said to articulate its own chronos, or perspective on time. As detailed in Chapter 1, the primary orientation of ancient societies was to the past, in which, it was believed, lay the Golden Age or time of perfection. The present was considered a fallen, deficient age, and the future could only be regarded with hope if — according to the doctrine of the cycle of time — it cycled back to the glorious past. Contemporary Western society observes a chronos diametrically opposed to that of the ancient world. The principal orientation is to the present and the near-future, where consumption is achieved, information is communicated, the new mobile phone, computer or tablet supersedes the old and digital progress is made. The past is largely dismissed, often contemptuously, as irrelevant.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Lev Manovich, ‘Future Fictions’ in Frieze No. 156, June–August 2013, p. 199.
Cited in Cohen, M. J. and Major, John (eds) History in Quotations, London: Cassell, 2004, p. xxv.
Of the many studies of the history of progress and its genesis in the Enlightenment, the classic work is J. B. Bury, The Idea of Progress: An Inquiry into Its Origin and Growth, 1955 [1920].
Steven Rose, The Making of Memory, London: Bantam Press, 1991, p. 91.
Igor Stravinsky, Poetics of Music in the Form of Six Lessons, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1970, p. 57.
William Kentridge, ‘Felix in Exile: Geography of Memory’ (extract) in William Kentridge Catalogue, London: Phaidon, 2003, p. 122.
Alan Gilbert, ‘“It’s Unclear Why …”/Walid Raad and the Writing of History’ in Zones of Contact: 2006 Biennale of Sydney Catalogue, Sydney: Biennale of Sydney, 2006, p. 80.
Tamara Trodd, ‘Thomas Demand, Jeff Wall and Sherrie Levine: Deforming “Pictures”’, Art History, Vol. 32 No. 5, 2009, p. 969.
Sophie Forbat, ‘Thomas Demand and the CTA’ in The Dailies catalogue, Sydney: MACK and Kaldor Public Art Projects, 2012, p. 5.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 John Potts
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Potts, J. (2015). The Big Now and the Faraway Then: Present, Past and Future in Contemporary Culture. In: The New Time and Space. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137494382_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137494382_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-57673-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-49438-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Media & Culture CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)