Abstract
I read Franz Fanon’s Wretched of the Earth when I was 18 and in my first year in college (University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria). One of my teachers, Professor Claude Ake, who interpreted the book to undergraduate students in one of his classes and also in his books, always pointed to the spatial arrangements of colonial cities in Africa. The structure of African cities, according to him, reveals the structure of brutal exploitation and oppression of the natives by European colonial masters.1 The spatial arrangements also symbolize and at the same time make physical the separation between whites and blacks in African cities and the development-negating dependence of African economies on Western countries. These deplorable and discriminatory spatial and economic arrangements were carried over by the bourgeoisie who took over powers from the departing colonial rulers. Ake, in his interpretation of the Wretched of the Earth, drew students’ attention to how exploitation and oppression are splayed out on the African ground. The colonial rulers claimed and consumed the wealth of the land in the exclusive plush part of the colonial town and the natives in another part of the town handled the waste from their consumption, showing stark separation between the haves and have-nots.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See Claude Ake, A Political Economy of Africa (Harlow, Essex: Longman, 1981), 78.
Frantz Fanon, The Wretched of the Earth, trans. Constance Farrington (New York: Grove, 1962), 39.
The ideas in this paragraph are influenced by Peter Alexander Egom, Economics of Justice and Peace (Lagos: Adioné, 2007).
For an excellent discussion of how the debt money and debt economy of the late capitalism neutralize time and capture the potentialities of nonowners of capital, see Maurizio Lazzarato, The Making of the Indebted Man (Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(e), 2012), 44–88.
See Robert Merrihew Adams, Theory of Virtue: Excellence in Being for the Good (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006), 89–91, for an argument about how concern for the good of persons is linked with caring for some activities for their own sake.
I have borrowed the rhetorical flourish of Oscar Cullman in a different context for my purpose here. Oscar Cullman, Harry Wolfson, Werner Jaeger, and Henry J. Cadbury, Immortality and Resurrection: Death in the Western World, Two Conflicting Currents of Thought (New York: Macmillan, 1965), 19. For the meaning of excellence, see my Principle of Excellence.
Paul Tillich, Systematic Theology: Existence and the Christ, vol. 2 (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1957), 86–96.
Tillich, “The Importance of New Being for Christian Theology,” in Man and Transformation: Papers from the Eranos Yearbook 30, no. 5, ed. Joseph Campbell (New York: Bollington Foundation, 1964), 164.
I owe the construction of the parenthetical phrase to Robison B. James, “Historicizing God ala Paul Tillich and Barth (Both!): Formula for Good Theology,” North American Paul Tillich Society 37, no. 1 (Winter 2011): 15.
Sigurd Bergmann, Creation Set Free: The Spirit as Liberator of Nature, trans. Douglas Stott (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2005), 303. I have borrowed his words and put them in a very different context.
Philip Sheldrake, “A Spiritual City: Urban Vision and the Christian tradition,” in Theology in Built Environments, ed. Sigurd Bergmann (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 2009), 164–65; italics in the original.
Peter Alexander Egom, NEPAD and the Common Good (Lagos: Global Market Forum, 2004), 2.
I am using typography and typology in the same sense they are used by Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri, Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004), 158–59.
Roger C. Hutchinson, “Mutuality: Procedural Norm and Foundational Symbol,” in Liberation and Ethics, ed. Charles Amjad-Ali and W. Alvin Pitcher (Chicago, IL: Center for the Scientific Study of Religion, 1985), 97–110.
Gibson Winter, Elements for a Social Ethics (New York: Macmillan, 1966), 233.
Gibson Winter, Community and Spiritual Transformation: Religion and Politics in a Communal Age (New York: Crossroad, 1989), 104.
Copyright information
© 2014 Nimi Wariboko
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wariboko, N. (2014). The Communion Quotient of Cities. In: The Charismatic City and the Public Resurgence of Religion. CHARIS: Christianity and Renewal—Interdisciplinary Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137463197_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137463197_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-49674-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-46319-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)