Abstract
Monitoring and evaluation (M&E) are an essential component of the governance for any institute of higher education, especially in a multifaceted area such as sustainability. The measuring criteria and the tools needed to conduct the assessment process are entirely dependent on the purpose for which the assessment is being carried out, and the objectives and scope of the assessment should be well defined before the assessment takes place. In the case of sustainability assessment, the aim should be creating a balance between the key elements of sustainability, namely environment, society and economy. The needs and concerns of each institute of higher education may vary, however the above three elements can be considered as the core components of any sustainability assessment globally.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chambers R., Conway G. R. (1991) Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: Practical Concepts for the 21st Century (Brighton: Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex).
Economic Planning Unit, Malaysia (2006) 9th Malaysian Plan (2006–2010) (Malaysia: Office of the Prime Minister).
EUA Report on Rankings (2011) ‘Global University Rankings and Their Impact’, http://www.eua.be/pubs/Global_University_Rankings_and_Their_Impact.pdf, date accessed 27 April 2013.
Senaha E. (2010) ‘Alternative University Appraisal Based on ESD. Perspective on University Performance Evaluation on March 16, 2010’, ias.unu.edu/resource_centre/Eijun%20Senaha.pdf, date accessed 25 June 2013.
Shriberg M. P. (2002a) ‘Sustainability in US Higher Education: Organizational Factors Influencing Campus Environmental Performance and Leadership’, http://promiseofplace.org/research_attachments/Shriberg2002SustainabilityinHigherEdu.pdf, date accessed 13 June 2013.
Shriberg M. P. (2002b) ‘Institutional Assessment Tools for Sustainability in Higher Education: Strength, Weakness and Implication for Practice and Theory’. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 3 (3) 202, 254–270.
Sustainable Endowments Institute (2011) ‘The College Sustainability Report Card’, http://www.greenreportcard.org/report-card-2011/executive-summary, date accessed 27 April 2013.
ULSF (Association of University Leaders for a Sustainable Future) (2012) ‘Sustainability Assessment Questionnaire’, http://www.ulsf.org/programs_saq.html, date accessed 27 April 2014.
UNESCO (2010) ‘Rankings and Accountability in Higher Education-Unesco’, http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/ED/pdf/RANKINGS/Downing.pdf, date accessed 25 June 2013.
UNESCO Forum on Rankings and Accountability. ‘What’s the Use of Ranking? Using Rankings to Drive Internal Quality Improvements’, www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/…/HQ/ED/…/RANKINGS/Downing.pdf, date accessed 27 April 2013.
UNESCO World Conference on Education for Sustainable Development (2009) ‘Bonn Declaration’, http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0018/001887/188799e.pdf, date accessed 27 April 2013.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Salfarina Abdul Gapor, Abd Malik Abd Aziz, Dzulkifli Abdul Razak and Zainal Abidin Sanusi
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gapor, S.A., Aziz, A.M.A., Razak, D.A., Sanusi, Z.A. (2014). Implementing Education for Sustainable Development in Higher Education: Case Study of Albukhary International University, Malaysia. In: Fadeeva, Z., Galkute, L., Mader, C., Scott, G. (eds) Sustainable Development and Quality Assurance in Higher Education. Palgrave Studies in Global Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137459145_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137459145_12
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-49873-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-45914-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Education CollectionEducation (R0)