Abstract
We have already examined how problematic schizophrenia classification, definition, and so forth could be for individual researchers. Yet schizophrenia, as we also saw, would not collapse under the weight of its conceptual problems or critical attention. Indeed, by the close of the twentieth century, schizophrenia had seemingly become a truly international concept, upheld by a global community of researchers. Facilitating all this, and something not yet explored in our earlier chapters, is that over the course of the century, when it came to conceptualising schizophrenia, the once authoritative status of individual researchers was largely displaced by the pronouncements of powerful institutions. Hence, as the twentieth century progressed, attempts to standardise and collectively validate the concept were often made at a communal level through, for example, the auspices of the World Health Organization (WHO).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 Kieran McNally
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McNally, K. (2016). Manufacturing Consensus in North America. In: A Critical History of Schizophrenia. Palgrave Studies in the Theory and History of Psychology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137456816_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137456816_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-55226-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-45681-6
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)