Abstract
This volume’s title centrally alludes to ‘new directions’ in Comparative Capitalisms (CC) research and thus sets the collective agenda for the multiple and diverse contributions it comprises. The shared point of departure across the chapters in this book is the observation that the CC field, which is centrally concerned with studying the differences, institutional and otherwise, between different localized ‘models’ or ‘varieties’ of capitalism, is going through several interwoven processes of rapid and consequential change:
-
The dominance of Peter Hall and David Soskice’s Varieties of Capitalism (VoC) approach, which occupied the centre of the broad CC field for almost a decade after its publication (Hall and Soskice, 2001) has gradually eroded in recent years, as a combined result of internal (intra-CC) and external critiques. Some of the most important criticisms concern VoC’s underestimation of the really existing diversity of contemporary capitalism, its bias towards thinking in static terms and its economistic and functionalist predispositions (see, for example, Bruff and Ebenau, 2014b; Streeck, 2010). While this perspective is still influential, inspiring a ‘second generation’ of research projects framed in VoC terms, it has undoubtedly lost the dominant position it once held in CC debates.
-
The latter has now passed to a broad, heterogeneous and rapidly evolving group of ‘post-VoC’ perspectives. These generally remain within the paradigmatic boundaries of neoinstitutionalism, the longstanding theoretical underpinning of CC research. Nevertheless, their proponents see the analytical problems which the dynamic ‘VoC debate’ unearthed during the 2000s as too relevant and too deeply rooted to be resolved through limited modifications or extensions of this approach’s ‘relational view of the firm’. Rather, they turn (back) to the wider neoinstitutionalist paradigm, including its historical, sociological, discursive and statist variants for analytical guidance and, on this basis, elaborate new and innovative approaches for analysing the diversity of contemporary capitalism through a focus on institutions (see, for example, Becker, 2009; Crouch, 2005; Streeck, 2012). At the same time, neoinstitutionalist CC scholarship is increasingly being challenged by proponents of critical political economy (often Marxist) perspectives. These scholars argue that it is necessary to more fundamentally shift the coordinates of CC research if we are to make sense of the manifold forms in which we encounter contemporary capitalism around the globe and, crucially, of the huge and persistent social and economic inequalities which stretch across different ‘types’ of capitalism (see, for example, Albo, 2005; Bruff, 2011; Radice, 2000).
-
This theoretical debate is accompanied — and, to a considerable degree, driven — by an expansion of the geographical scope of CC research, a process which may be described as an incipient ‘globalization’ of the field. Thus, more and more world regions, including Central and Eastern Europe, Latin America and, more recently, China, are coming into the horizon of CC scholars, while at the same time regional specialists increasingly draw on CC perspectives for enriching their own approaches (see, for example, Bohle and Greskovits, 2012; Huang, 2008; Schneider, 2013). This is certainly a welcome development, since it helps to bring down unhelpful disciplinary barriers to, among others, development and transition studies, but as with the wider field it is pervaded by intense debate on the best way forward in globalizing CC research.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Albo, G. (2005) ‘Contesting the “New Capitalism” ’, in D. Coates (ed.), Varieties of Capitalism, Varieties of Approaches (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan), 63–82.
Becker, U. (2009) Open Varieties of Capitalism: Continuity, Change and Performances (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
Bohle, D. and B. Greskovits (2012) Capitalist Diversity on Europe’s Periphery (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).
Bruff, I. (2011) ‘What about the Elephant in the Room? Varieties of Capitalism, Varieties in Capitalism’, New Political Economy, 16:4, 481–500.
Bruff, I. and M. Ebenau (eds.) (2014a) ‘Critical Political Economy and Capitalist Diversity’, special issue of Capital & Class, 38:1, 3–251.
Bruff, I. and M. Ebenau (2014b) ‘Critical Political Economy and the Critique of Comparative Capitalisms Scholarship on Capitalist Diversity’, Capital & Class, 38:1, 3–15.
Bruff, I., M. Ebenau, C. May and A. Nölke (eds.) (2013) Vergleichende Kapitalismusforschung: Stand, Perspektiven, Kritik (Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot).
Coates, D. (2005) ‘Conclusion: Choosing Between Paradigms — A Personal View’, in D. Coates (ed.), Varieties of Capitalism, Varieties of Approaches (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan), 265–71.
Crouch, C. (2005) Capitalist Diversity and Change: Recombinant Governance and Institutional Entrepreneurs (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Ebenau, M., R. Kößler, C. May and I. Wehr (eds.) (2013) ‘Die Welt des Kapitals’, double special issue of PERIPHERIE: Zeitschrift für Politik und Ökonomie in der Dritten Welt, 33:130–1, 143–348.
Hall, P.A. and D. Soskice (eds.) (2001) Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Huang, Y. (2008) Capitalism with Chinese Characteristics: Entrepreneurship and the State (New York et al.: Cambridge University Press).
Radice, H. (2000) ‘Globalization and National Capitalisms: Theorizing Convergence and Differentiation’, Review of International Political Economy, 7:4, 719–42.
Schneider, B.R. (2013) Hierarchical Capitalism in Latin America: Business, Labor, and the Challenges of Equitable Development (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Soederberg, S., G. Menz and P. Cerny (eds.) (2005) Internalizing Globalization: The Rise of Neoliberalism and the Decline of National Varieties of Capitalism (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
Streeck, W. (2010) ‘E Pluribus Unum? Varieties and Commonalities of Capitalism’, MPIfG Working Papers, 10/12 (Köln: Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung).
Streeck, W. (2012) ‘How to Study Contemporary Capitalism?’ European Journal of Sociology, 53:1, 1–28.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Matthias Ebenau, Ian Bruff and Christian May
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ebenau, M., Bruff, I., May, C. (2015). Introduction: Comparative Capitalisms Research and the Emergence of Critical, Global Perspectives. In: Ebenau, M., Bruff, I., May, C. (eds) New Directions in Comparative Capitalisms Research. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137444615_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137444615_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-49570-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-44461-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Intern. Relations & Development CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)