Abstract
Insects have long been regarded with a mixture of anxiety and awe by humans. Their metaphorical place within the animal kingdom is precarious and accidental; some might even say insects have more in common with mythical creatures than real-life animals. Similarly, Ireland’s transnational writers put pressure on canonical categorizations of literature in national terms, and therefore continually remind us of the fragility and arbitrariness of the term ‘Irish’. Although entomological metaphors abound in literature, little attention has been paid to their significance in terms of pushing the boundaries of national canons. Similarly, although insects are everywhere metaphorically and textually in these works, not enough emphasis has been paid to their real-life situation and environmental import. This essay aims to address these two issues and argue for a reading of the insect which is sensitive to their metaphorical and actualized ability to stretch our thinking about our lived and imaginary environments.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
R. S. Kellert (1993) ‘The Biological Basis for Human Values of Nature’, in The Biophilia Hypothesis, eds Stephen R. Kellert and Edward O. Wilson (Washington, DC: Island Press), 57–8, quoted in Insect Poetics (2006) ed. Eric C. Brown (Minneapolis, London: U of Minnesota Press), xi.
See for example the sex allocation practices of some bees in P. Pamilo (1991) ‘Evolution of Colony Characteristics in Social Insects: Sex Allocation’ in The American Naturalist, 137(1) (Jan. 1991): 83–107.
The feminization of this phenomenon is also worth mentioning. As Charlotte Sleigh argues, in the early twentieth century innovation was considered as a masculine (and desirable) trait, while the ‘mother-machine’ of social adaptation was seen as a castrating and exclusively feminine force: ‘Once modern society was defined by its passive, deindividualized citizens, then it was forever restricted within its feminine mold, because it was in the nature of the female to reproduce, rather than to innovate.’ C. Sleigh (2006) ‘Inside Out: the Unsettling Nature of Insects’ in Eric C. Brown (ed.) Insect Poetics (Minneapolis, London: U of Minnesota Press), 293.
J. Adams (2009) Species Richness: Patterns in the Diversity of Life (Chichester: Praxis Publishing Ltd, Springer-Praxis Books in Environmental Sciences), 273.
R. Braidotti (2011) ‘In-Sects/Sex’ in Nomadic Theory: the Portable Rosi Braidotti (New York, Chichester: Columbia University Press), 341.
For more about this topic, see Elizabeth Grosz (1995) ‘Animal Sex: Libido as Desire and Death’, in E. Grosz and E. Probyn (eds) Sexy Bodies: the Strange Carnalities of Feminism (London: Routledge), 278–300.
C. Wolfe (2010) What is Posthumanism? (Minneapolis, London: U of Minnesota Press), xv.
R. Harrington, C. R. Shortall, and I. P. Woiwod (2010) ‘Aerial Insect Biomass: Trends from Long-term Monitoring’, in Norman Maclean (ed.) Silent Summer: the State of Wildlife in Britain and Ireland (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 540–56.
F. Moretti (2000) ‘Conjectures on World Literature’, New Left Review, 1 (Jan.–Feb.): 67.
A. Seyhan (2001) Writing Outside the Nation (Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press), 10.
P. D. Hylliard (2007) The Private Life of Spiders (London: New Holland Publishers), 136–8.
C. R. Mack (2005) Looking at the Renaissance: Essays Toward a Contextual Appreciation (Michigan: U of Michigan Press, 2005), 31; 65.
On this subject see S. Baker, Picturing the Beast: Animals, Identity and Representation : ‘It is clear that Western society continues to draw heavily on symbolic ideas involving animals and that the immediate subjects of those ideas is frequently not the animal itself, but rather a human subject drawing on animal imagery to make a statement about human identity.’ S. Baker (1993) Picturing the Beast: Animals, Identity and Representation (Manchester, Manchester University Press), ix.
E. Bourke (2011) piano (Dublin: The Dedalus Press), 61–2.
See F. G. Bart (2002) A Spider’s World: Senses and Behaviour (Berlin, New York: Springer Verlag).
E. Bourke (1985) Gonella (Galway: Salmon Publishing), 28.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Borbála Faragó
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Faragó, B. (2015). Transnational — Transanimal: Reading the Insect in Migrant Irish Poetry. In: Kirkpatrick, K., Faragó, B. (eds) Animals in Irish Literature and Culture. Palgrave Studies in Animals and Literature. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137434807_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137434807_16
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-68316-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-43480-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)