Abstract
The ‘Occupy’ protests provide numerous examples of new social movement organizations based on a complex, multilayered ecosystem heavily supported by social media and its ability to connect heterogeneous social networks. Studies of these type of organizations have stressed not only the importance of new media tools as a mobilization channels but also the influence of the Free Culture Movement on the genealogy, in terms of its composition, agenda, framing, and organizational logic (Fuster-Morell, 2012). Studies of the Occupy movements’ activities have shown the importance of the online tools for new forms of mass mobilizations, for example (Borge-Holthoefer et al., 2011). Mobilizations become different in their nature: they are faster, can connect previously unlinked people, and are spontaneous (Bennett, 2003). However, few studies have looked into organizational characteristics beyond the online processes and their effect on mobilization. This article investigates how new forms of organizations characterized by being complex and multilayered networks select their organizational objectives and turn them into political matters. We ask how these organizational goals emerge, how they are selected, organized and ultimately impact the political arena.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Amenta, E., Dunleavy, K. & Bernstein, M. (1994). Stolen thunder? Huey Long’s ‘Share our Wealth,’ political mediation, and the second New Deal. American Sociological Review, 59: 678–702.
Andrews, K. T. (2002). Movement-countermovement dynamics and the emergence of new institutions: The case of ‘White Flight’ schools in Mississippi. Social Forces, 80: 911–936.
Bennett, W. L. (2003). New Media Power: The Internet and Global Activism. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
Bennett, W. L. & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5): 739–768.
Borge-Holthoefer, J., Rivero, A., Garcia, I., Cauhe, E., Ferrer, A. & Francos, I., et al. (2011). Structural and dynamical patterns on online social networks: The Spanish May 15th movement as a case study. PLoS ONE, 6(8): doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023883
Boudreau, V. (1996). Northern theory, southern protest: Opportunity structure analysis in cross-national perspective. Mobilization, 1: 175–189.
Castelló, I., Etter, M. & Nielsen, F. A. (2013). Legitimacy Building in the Networked Society and the Locus of Control. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Annual Conference, Orlando, Miami.
Castelló, I., Morsing, M. & Schultz, F. (2013a). Communicative dynamics and the polyphony of corporate social responsibility in the network society. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(4): 683–694. doi: 10.1007/s10551-013-1954-1
Costain, A. N. (1992). Inviting Women’s Rebellion: A Political Process Interpretation of the Women’s Movement. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
della-Porta, D., Fillieule, O. & Reiter, H. (1998). Policing protest in France and Italy: From intimidation to cooperation? In D. S. Meyer & S. Tarrow (eds), The Social Movement Society: Contentious Politics for a New Century. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Etzion, D. & Ferraro, F. (2010). The role of analogy in the institutionalization of sustainability reporting. Organization Science, 21(5): 1092–1107.
Fetner, T. (2001). Working Anita Bryant: The impact of Christian antigay activism on lesbian and gay movement claims. Social Problems, 48: 411–428.
Flick, U. (1998). An Introduction to Qualitative Research. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
Fuster-Morell, M. F. (2012). The Free Culture and 15M movements in Spain: Composition, social networks and synergies. Social Movement Studies, 11(3–4): 86–392.
Gamson, W. A. & Meyer, D. S. (1996). Framing political opportunity. In D. McAdam, J. D. McCarthy & M. N. Zald (eds), Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements (pp. 275–290). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Gioia, D. & Pitre, E. (1990). Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building. Academy of Management Review, 15: 584–602.
Goodwin, J. (1997). The libidinal constitutions of a high-risk social movement: Affectual ties and solidarity in the Huk Rebellion. American Sociological Review, 63: 53–69.
Jenkins, J. C. & Eckert, C. (1986). Elite patronage and the channeling of social protest. American Sociological Review, 51: 812–829.
Jick, T. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods. Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24: 602–611.
Kitschelt, H. P. (1986). Political opportunity structures and political protest: Anti-nuclear movements in four democracies. British Journal of Political Science, 16: 57–85.
Kostova, T. & Zaheer, S. (1999). Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 24: 64–81.
Kozinets, R. (2002). The field behind the screen: Using netnography for marketing research in online communities. Journal of Marketing Research, 39: 61–72.
Kurzman, C. (1996). Structural opportunity and perceived opportunity in social movement theory: The Iranian Revolution of 1979. American Sociological Review, 61: 153–178.
Laclau, E. (1989). Politics and the limits of modernity. Social Text, 21: 63–82.
Lewis, M. & Grimes, A. (1999). Metatriangulation: Building theory from multiple paradigms. Academy of Management Review, 24(4): 672–690.
Lounsbury, M. (2007). A Tale of Two Cities: Competing logics and practice variation in the professionalizing of mutual funds. Academy of Management Journal, 50: 289–307.
Lounsbury, M., Ventresca, M. J. & Hirsch, P. M. (2003). Social movements, field frames and industry emergence: A cultural-political perspective on US recycling. Socio-Economic Review, 1: 71–104.
Maguire, S. & Hardy, C. (2009). Discourse and deinstitutionalization: The decline of DDT. Academy of Management Journal, 52: 148–178.
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Meyer, D. S. (1993). Peace protest and policy: Explaining the rise and decline of antinuclear movements in postwar America. Policy Studies Journal, 21: 35–51.
Meyer, D. S. (2003). Political opportunity and nested institutions. Social Movement Studies, 2: 17–35.
Meyer, D. S. (2004). Protest and political opportunities. Annual Review of Sociology, 30: 125–145.
Meyer, D. S. & Staggenborg, S. (1996). Movements, countermovements, and the structure of political opportunity. American Journal of Sociology, 101: 1628–1660.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, Inc.
Phillips, N., Lawrence, T. B. & Hardy, C. (2000). Inter-organizational collaboration and the dynamics of institutional fields. Journal of Management Studies, 37: 23–43.
Phillips, N., Lawrence, T. B. & Hardy, C. (2004). Discourse and institutions. Academy of Management Review, 29: 635–652.
Rohlinger, D. A. (2002). Framing the abortion debate: Organizational resources, media strategies, and movement-countermovement dynamics. Sociology Quarterly, 43: 479–507.
Rosenkopf, L. & Nerkar, A. (2001). Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 287–306.
Schneiberg, M. & Lounsbury, M. (2008). Social movements and institutional analysis. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin & R. Suddaby (eds), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. London, UK: Sage Publications Ltd.
Schneiberg, M. & Soule, S. A. (2005). Institutionalization as a contested, multilevel process: The case of rate regulation in American fire insurance. In G. F. Davis, D. McAdam, W. R. Scott & M. N. Zald (eds), Social Movements and Organization Theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Suddaby, R. & Greenwood, R. (2005). Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50: 35–67.
Tarrow, S. (1994). Power in Movement: Collective Action, Social Movements and Politics. Cambridge University Press.
Tilly, C. (1978). From Mobilization to Revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Tilly, C. (1995). Popular Contention in Great Britain 1758–1834. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.
Washington, M. & Ventresca, M. J. (2004). How organizations change: The role of institutional support mechanisms in the incorporation of higher education visibility strategies, 1874–1995. Organization Science, 15: 82–96.
Zietsma, C. & Lawrence, T. B. (2010). Institutional work in the transformation of an organizational field: The interplay of boundary work and practice work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55: 189–221.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Itziar Castelló and David Barberá
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Castelló, I., Barberá, D. (2015). Why Some Political Opportunities Succeed and Others Fail: Bridging Organizational Levels in the Case of Spanish Occupy. In: Uldam, J., Vestergaard, A. (eds) Civic Engagement and Social Media. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137434166_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137434166_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-49288-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-43416-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Media & Culture CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)