Skip to main content

The Importance of Gathering Together: Religious Land Use in the United States and China

  • Chapter
Christianity in Chinese Public Life: Religion, Society, and the Rule of Law

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Religion, Politics, and Policy ((PSRPP))

  • 100 Accesses

Abstract

Both China and the United States constitutionally affirm religious freedom. While these two states have developed radically different relationships with their religious communities, they have one concern in common: land and buildings. Local authorities tend to allocate land in ways that maximize profits, jobs, and revenue. Despite constitutional protections, congregations often feel vulnerable when local officials have the authority to deny their requests to meet in a particular location, lease or buy property, or expand their facilities. In the United States, both statutory and case law in recent years have provided more protection for religious property rights, but not yet in China. Might addressing these land use issues provide some breakthroughs that religious freedom advocates are seeking, within and beyond China?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Berkley Center for Religion, Peace & World Affairs. “Hu Jintao on the Communist Party’s Approach to Religion in China.” Georgetown University, http://berkleycenter.georgetown.edu/resources/quotes/hu-jintao-on-the-communist-party-s-approach-to-religion-in-china?q=governance.

  • Canady, Charles T. “Religious Liberty Protection Act of 1999, Report from the Committee on the Judiciary.” Washington, DC: US House of Representatives, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, May M. C. “House Church Movements and Religious Freedom in China.” China: An International Journal 1:1 (March 2003): 16–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • City of Boerne V. Flores, 521 U.S. 507 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate. Issues Related to Religious Liberty Protection, and Focusing on the Constitutionality of a Religious Protection Measure 106th Congress, First Session, June 23, and September 9, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, Daniel P. “Religious Land Uses, Zoning, and the Courts in 2008.” Planning & Environmental Law 61:7 (July 2009): 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • “Defiant Christians Petition China Parliament.” Bangkok Post, May 12, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinan, John. “Congressional Responses to the Rehnquist Court’s Federalism Decisions.” Publius 32:3 (Summer 2002): 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon V. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fallman, Fredrik. “Useful Opium? ‘Adapted Religion’ and ‘Harmony’ in Contemporary China.” Journal of Contemporary China 19:67 (2010): 949–969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giamio, Michael S. “RLUIPA in the Courts.” In Michael S. Giamio and Lora A. Lucero, eds, RLUIPA Reader: Religious Land Uses, Zoning, and the Courts, ch. 6, 87–112. Chicago: American Bar Association, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giamio, Michael S., and Lora A. Lucero, eds. RLUIPA Reader: Religious Land Uses, Zoning, and the Courts. Chicago: American Bar Association, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong, Ting. “Corruption and Local Governance: The Double Identity of Chinese Local Governments in Market Reform.” The Pacific Review 19:1 (2006): 85–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatch, Orrin G. “Religious Liberty at Home and Abroad: Reflections on Protecting This Fundamental Freedom.” Brigham Young University Law Review 2001:2 (2001): 413–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, Alan, and Kim-Kwong Chan. Protestantism in Contemporary China. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Junning, Liu. “Freedom of Religion: The Primary Human Right: The World Does Not Belong to Caesar.” Chinese Law & Religion Monitor 6:2 (2010): 41–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Justice, US Department of. “Report on the Tenth Anniversary of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act.” Washington, DC, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindopp, Jason. “Fragmented yet Defiant: Protestant Resilience under Chinese Communist Party Rule.” In Jason Kindopp and Carol Lee Hamrin, eds, God and Caesar in China. 122–145. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laycock, Douglas. “State RFRAs and Land Use Regulation.” U.C. Davis Law Review 32 (1999): 755.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leguo, Zheng. “A General Interpretation of Religious Policy and Tactics in China-Defense of Rights through Legal Means against Religious Persecution.” Chinese Law & Religion Monitor 7:1 (2011): 16–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, Beatrice. “China’s Religious Freedom Policy: The Art of Managing Religious Activity” The China Quarterly 184 (December 2005): 894–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, Leo. “Christmas Cancelled after Beijing Police Crackdown.” The Times (London), December 26, 2011, 32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubman, Stanley B. Bird in a Cage: Legal Reform in China after Mao. Stanford University: Stanford University Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, Adam J. “A Non-Fatal Collision: Interpreting RLUIPA Where Religious Land Uses and Community Interests Meet.” The Urban Lawyer 42:1 (2010): 41–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, Christopher, and Zhifeng Zhong. “Chinese Views on Church and State.” Journal of Church and State 52:1 (2010): 34–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meck, Stuart. “Zoning and Anti-Semitism in the 1920s: The Case of Cleveland Jewish Orphan Home V. Village of University Heights and Its Aftermath.” Journal of Planning History 4:2 (May 1, 2005): 91–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, Liu. “Church and State Relations in China.” Journal of Contemporary China 5:11 (2007): 69–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — “A Crisis of Faith.” China Security 4:4 (2008): 25–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selles, Kurt D. “Protestant Worship with Chinese Characteristics: Reflections on a Chinese Worship Service.” Exchange 41 (2012): 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shijian, Yang and Zhao Dan. “Summary of Academic Seminar on ‘Religious Freedom and Ethnic Harmony’.” China Aid Association, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, Russell. “Property Rights in China’s Economic Reforms.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 31:3 (1998): 235–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • State, US Department of. “July–December, 2010 International Religious Freedom Report.” 1–32, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subcommittee on the Constitution of the Committee on the Judiciary. Religious Liberty Protection Act of 1998, 105th, July 14, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Tear Gas Scatters Christmas Worship.” States News Service, December 26, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tongsu, Liu. “Civil Disobedience and the Legal Positioning of Chinese House Churches.” Chinese Law & Religion Monitor 7:1 (2011): 90–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vala, Carsten T. “Protestant Christianity and Civil Society in Authoritarian China.” China Perspectives no. 3 (2012): 43–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Village of Euclid V. Ambler Realty Co., 272 U.S. 365 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wielander, Gerda. “Bridging the Gap? An Investigation of Beijing Intellectual House Church Activities and Their Implications for China’s Democratization.” Journal of Contemporary China 18:62 (2009): 849–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Fenggang. “Religion in China under Communism: A Shortage Economy Explanation.” Journal of Church and State 52:1 (2010): 3–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Xing Quan. “Urban Land Reform in China.” Land Use Policy 14:3 (1997): 187–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Yan, and Ke Fang. “Is History Repeating Itself? From Urban Renewal in the United States to Inner-City Redevelopment in China.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 23 (2004): 286–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Jennifer E. Walsh

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Walsh, J.E. (2014). The Importance of Gathering Together: Religious Land Use in the United States and China. In: Carpenter, J.A., den Dulk, K.R. (eds) Christianity in Chinese Public Life: Religion, Society, and the Rule of Law. Palgrave Studies in Religion, Politics, and Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137410184_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics