Abstract
The distinguishing factor of retributive justice, in contrast with restorative justice, is its central emphasis on holding perpetrators legally accountable for their actions and administering punishment fitting the crime. This chapter provides a discussion on international law as pertaining to transitional justice, with specific analysis on the extent to which it is gender-sensitive. In doing so, the chapter highlights some of the critical gaps that currently exist and their consequences. The theoretical discussion here is accompanied by a brief analysis of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR), International Criminal Tribunal for Yugoslavia (ICTY), and The Rome Statute. Although these are not full-fledged case studies, the definitional precedents set in ICTR, ICTY, and ICC are compared to highlight some salient lessons learned related to women’s inclusion, participation, and representation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Mayesha Alam
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Alam, M. (2014). Retributive Approaches to Transitional Justice: A Feminist Analysis of How International Law Shapes National and International Prosecutions. In: Women and Transitional Justice: Progress and Persistent Challenges in Retributive and Restorative Processes. Palgrave Pivot, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137409362_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137409362_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-48863-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-40936-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Intern. Relations & Development CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)