Abstract
During the five decades after Berle and Means published The Modern Corporation and Private Property in 1932, their analysis became the dominant understanding of the American corporation. Social scientists, policymakers, and the broader interested public knew about the separation of ownership and control, the potentially fraught relations between shareholders and managers, and the image of the corporation as a social institution. Berle and Means’s view of an economy dominated by a handful of ever-larger corporations run by an unaccountable managerial class inspired scholarship from sociologists (who were convinced they were right) to financial economists (who wanted to prove them wrong) to lawyers (who contemplated the rights and obligations implied by this system).
Originally appeared in Seattle University Law Review (2011), 34: 1121–1138.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alchian, A., & Demsetz, H. 1972. Production, information costs and economic organization. American Economic Review, 62: 777–795.
Back, A., Lee, J., & Kok, C. 2010. Analysts expect iPad to give lift to Asian suppliers. Wall Street Journal, January 29.
Barboza, D. 2010. String of suicides continues at electronics supplier in China. New York Times, May 25.
Barboza, D., & Barrionuevo, A. 2007. Filler in animal feed is open secret in China. New York Times, April 30.
Berle, A. A. 1931. Corporate powers as powers in trust. Harvard Law Review, 44(7): 1049–1074.
Berle, A. A. 1954. The 20th century capitalist revolution. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
Berle, A., & Means, G. C. 1932. The modern corporation and private property. New York: Macmillan.
Brandeis, L. D. 1914. Other people’s money: And how the bankers use it. Frederick A Stokes.
Bucks, B. K., Kennickell, A. B., & Moore, K. B. 2006. Recent changes in U.S. family finances: Evidence from the 2001 and 2004 survey of consumer finances. Federal Reserve Bulletin, A1–A38.
Byron, E. 2007. 101 brand names, one manufacturer. Wall Street Journal, May 9.
Cox, E. B. 1963. Trends in the distribution of stock ownership. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Dahrendorf, R. 1959. Class and class conflict in industrial society. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
Davis, G. F. 2009. Managed by the markets: How finance re-shaped America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Davis, G. F. 2008. A new finance capitalism? Mutual funds and ownership re-concentration in the United States. European Management Review, 5: 11–21.
Davis, G. F., & Cobb, J. A. 2010. Corporations and economic inequality around the world: The paradox of hierarchy. Research in Organizational Behavior, 30: 33–53.
Davis, G. F., Diekmann, K. A., & Tinsley, C. H. 1994. The decline and fall of the conglomerate firm in the 1980s: The deinstitutionalization of an organizational form. American Sociological Review, 59(4): 547–570.
Davis, G. F., & Stout, S. K. 1992. Organization theory and the market for corporate control: A dynamic analysis of the characteristics of large takeover targets 1980–1990. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(4): 605–633.
Drucker, P. F. 1949. The new society I: Revolution by mass production. Harper’s Magazine, September 21–30.
Hansmann, H., & Kraakman, R. 2001. The end of history for corporate law. Georgetown Law Journal, 89: 439–468.
Harris, G. 2008. U.S. identifies tainted heparin in 11 countries. New York Times, April 22.
Investment Company Institute Factbook. 2010. http://www.icifactbook.org/.
Jensen, M. C. 1989. Eclipse of the public corporation. Harvard Business Review, 67(5): 61–74.
Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior agency, cost and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3: 305–360.
Karlgaard, R. 2010. Apple to the rescue? Wall Street Journal, January 28.
Kaysen, C. 1957. The social significance of the modern corporation. American Economic Review, 47(2): 311–319.
Lawton, C., Kane, Y., & Dean, J. 2008. U.S. upstart takes on TV giants in price war. Wall Street Journal, April 15.
Manne, H. G. 1965. Mergers and the market for corporate control. Journal of Political Economy, 73(2): 110–120.
Mills, C. W. 1956. The power elite. New York: Oxford University Press.
New York Times. 2008. House panel criticizes F.D.A. role in drug cases. April 23.
Piore, M. J., & Sabel, C. F. 1984. The second industrial divide: Possibilities for prosperity. New York: Basic Books.
Roe, M. J. 1994. Strong managers, weak owners: The political roots of American corporate finance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Roy, W. G. 1997. Socializing capital: The rise of the large industrial corporation in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Schneiberg, M. 2011. Toward an organizationally diverse American capitalism? Cooperative, mutual, and local, state-owned enterprise. Seattle University Law Review, 34: 1409–1434.
White, L. J. 2001. What’s been happening to aggregate concentration in the United States? (And should we care?) NYU Working Paper No. EC-02-03, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1292649.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2015 Gerald Davis
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Davis, G. (2015). The Twilight of the Berle and Means Corporation. In: Goranova, M., Ryan, L.V. (eds) Shareholder Empowerment. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137373939_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137373939_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-37644-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-37393-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)