Abstract
As we have seen in the previous chapter, the production of an emotive response is valued by memorials as a key method of connecting individuals, particularly those with no living memory of the East German past, to the memories of repression that are narrated at these sites. However, the production of authenticity is only half of the story; the interpretation of the space or objects by the visitor reconstructs the meaning attributed to this authenticity. As Seaton (2009, p. 96) argues, ‘all spaces, probably most of all auratic spaces, do not have an absolute value but are polysemic, which is to say they may have different meanings for different audiences’. In this regard, Seaton (2009, p. 97) adds, ‘thanatourism1 management may involve the anticipation and negotiation of contradiction and conflict, due to the polysemia of place’. The highly contested nature of the GDR past and its significance for contemporary Germany make this particularly true for the sites under consideration in this study.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Sara Jones
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jones, S. (2014). Whose Memory Is It Anyway? Memorial Museums and Modes of Authority. In: The Media of Testimony. Palgrave Macmillan Memory Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137364043_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137364043_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-47320-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-36404-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Media & Culture CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)