Skip to main content

Bearing Witness to the Unbearable: Ethics and the Phallic Gaze in Irréversible

  • Chapter
Sensational Pleasures in Cinema, Literature and Visual Culture
  • 1142 Accesses

Abstract

Gaspar Noé’s notorious film Irréversible (2002) was met with both acclaim and condemnation upon its premiere at the 2002 Cannes Film Festival. Of the 2,400 people in the audience, over two hundred walked out, and over twenty are reported to have fainted or become physically ill.1 A Cannes official attending the premiere stated that “I’ve never seen this at the Cannes festival. The scenes in this film are unbearable, even for us professionals.”2 However, those who did remain until the end of the screening gave the film a five-minute standing ovation.3 After its premiere at Cannes, the film became a lightning rod for controversy due to the intense physical, emotional and psychological reactions experienced by spectators at various screenings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Ansen, D. (2 Mar. 2003). “How Far Is Too Far?”. The Daily Beast. Accessed 1 June 2012. <http://www.thedailybeast.com/news week/2003 /03/02/how-far-is-too-far.htmlx

  • Baudry, J.L. (1986). “Ideology of the Basic Cinematographic Apparatus”. In P. Rosen (ed.), Narrative, Apparatus, Ideology: A Film Theory Reader. New York: Columbia University Press: 286–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, P. (25 May 2002). “Review: Irreversible”. The Guardian. Accessed 1 June 2012. <http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2002/may/25/cannes2002. cannesfilmfestival 1>. “Cannes film sickens audience”. BBC News. 26 May 2002. Accessed 1 June 2012. <http://news.bbc.co.iLk/ 1/lii/entertainment/20 08 79 6.stm>.

  • Ebert, R. (14 Mar. 2003). “Review: hreversible”. Rogerebert.com. Accessed 10 June 2012. <http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20030314/ REVIEWS/303140303/1023>.

  • Horeck, T. (2004). Public Rape: Representing Violation in Fiction and Film. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irigaray, L. (1985). Speculum of the Other Woman (Spéculum de l’autre femme). Trans. Gillian G. Gill. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jay, M. (1993). Downcast Eyes: The Denigration of Vision in Twenty-first Century French Thought (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, L.U. (2000). The Skin of the Film: Intercultural Cinema, Embodiment, and the Senses. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, L.U. (2002). Touch: Sensuous Theory and Multi-sensory Media. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1968). The Visible and the Invisible: Followed by Working Notes (Le Visible et l’invisible, suivi de notes de travail). Ed. Claude Lefort. Trans. Alphonso Lingis. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metz, C. (1982). The Imaginary Signifier: Psychoanalysis and the Cinema (Le signifiant imaginaire: Psychanalyse et cinéma). Trans. Celia Britton, Annwyl Williams, Ben Brewster and Alfred Guzzetti. Bloomington and Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulvey, L. (1986). “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema”. In P. Rosen (ed.), Narrative, Apparatus, Ideology: A Film Theory Reader. New York: Columbia University Press: 198–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nancy, J.L. (2000). Being Singular Plural (Être singulier pluriel). Trans. Robert D. Richardson and Anne E. O’Byrne. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • “National Film Theatre Interviews: Gaspar Noé”. British Film Institute. 2002. Accessed 22 Jan. 2012. <ht tp: //www.bfi. org.uk /features/intervie ws /noe. html >. Projansky S. (2001). Watching Rape: Film and Television in Postfeminist Culture. New York and London: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quandt, J. (Feb. 2004). “Flesh and blood: sex and violence in recent French cinema”. Artforum 42.6: 126–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobchack, V. (2004). Carnal Thoughts: Embodiment and Moving Image Culture. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Society for the Promotion of Community Standards Inc. (21 Mar. 2003) “Sexual violence depiction causes audience collapse”. Scoop Politics. Accessed 15 June 2012. <http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO0303/S00182.htm>.

  • Stadler, J. (2008). Pulling Focus: Intersubjective Experience, Narrative Film, and Ethics. New York and London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

Filmography

  • The Accused. Dir. J. Kaplan. Perf. J. Foster and K. McGillis. Paramount Pictures, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boys Don’t Cry. Dir. K. Peirce. Perf. H. Swank, C. Sevigny and P. Sarsgaard. Fox Searchlight Pictures/The Independent Film Channel Productions/Killer Films/ Hart-Sharp Entertainment, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Criminal Lovers (Les amants criminels). Dir. F. Ozon. Perf. N. Régnier, J. Renier and M. Manojlovic. Fidélité Productions/arte France Cinema/SrudioCanal/Euro Space/ Canal+/Studio Images 5/Centre National de la Cinematographic (CNC), 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irréversible. Dir. G. Noé. Perf. M. Bellucci, V. Cassel and A. Dupontel. 120 Films/ Eskwad/Grandpiene/Les Cinémas de la Zone/Nord-Ouest Productions/Rossignon/ StudioCanal, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • North Country. Dir. N. Caro. Perf. C. Theron, T. Curtis and F. McDormand. Warner Bros./Industry Entertainment/Participant Media/Nich Wechsler Productions, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • TwentyninePalms. Dir. B. Dumont. Perf. Y. Glubeva and D. Wissak. 3B Productions/ The 7th Floor/Thoke Moebius Film Company, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Kathleen Scott

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Scott, K. (2014). Bearing Witness to the Unbearable: Ethics and the Phallic Gaze in Irréversible. In: Padva, G., Buchweitz, N. (eds) Sensational Pleasures in Cinema, Literature and Visual Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137363640_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics