Abstract
Low corporate tax rates, low regulation and limited disclosure are a common ‘development’ model, but may give unfair competitive advantage and facilitate tax avoidance and criminal activity. Low tax centres are seen as a tool of regional economic development, but tax concessions contradict the principle of tax neutrality. Some argue that competition between tax systems leads to the best outcomes, yet competition can cause a ‘race to the bottom’ in terms of tax rates. Corporate taxes as a percentage of total taxation have generally fallen. Policy based on tax incentives encourages the growth of the tax avoidance industry. The chapter argues that tax incentives erode the tax base, and a tax-based industrial policy leads to an emphasis on tax reduction, not to long-run economic success.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Action Aid (2013), Sweet Nothings, The Human Cost of British Sugar Giant Avoiding Taxes in Southern Africa, available at http://www.actionaid.org.uk. (Accessed 24 May 2013).
Annan, K. (2013), ‘Stop the Plunder of Africa’, New York Times, 9 May 2013.
Commission on Taxation (1982), Direct Taxation, Government Stationary Office, PL 617
Commission on Taxation (2009), Report 2009, Pm. A9/1203
Ernst & Young (2009), Reinventing European Growth, Ernst &Young’s 2009 European Attractiveness Survey
Ernst & Young (2011), Restart, Ernst & Young’s European Attractiveness Survey, 2011
European Commission (2011), Common Consolidated Tax Base: Questions and Answers, European Commission, 22 March 2011
European Commission (2013), EU Tax Policy Strategy, European Commission Taxation and Customs Union, updated 2 May 2013
Furman, J. (2008), The Concept of Neutrality in Tax Policy, Testimony before the US Senate on Finance Hearings, 15 April 2008, available at http://www.brookings.edu/.
Government Accountability Office (2008), Large U.S. Corporations and Federal Contractors rath Subsidiaries in Jurisdictions Listed as Tax Havens or Financial Privacy Jurisdictions, Report to Congressional Requesters, GAO-09-157
Krugman, P. (2013), ‘Treasure Island Trauma’, New York Times, 13 March 2013.
Mason, Hayes and Curran (2011), Ireland Expands Withholding Tax Exemption on Royalties, available at http://www.mhc.ie/publications/item/485/ireland-expands-withholding-tax-exemption-on-royalties/
OECD (1998), Harmful Tax Competition An Emerging Global Issue, Paris: OECD.
Public Accounts Committee (2013), Tax Avoidance: The Role of Large Accountancy Firms, Forty-fourth Report of Session 2012–2013, HC 870
OECD (2000), Towards Global Tax Co-operation. Report to the 2000 Ministerial Council Meeting and Recommendations by the Committee on Fiscal Affairs, Progress in Identifying and Eliminating Harmful Tax Practices
OECD (2008), Tax Incentives for INVESTMENT — Global Perspective: Experiences in MENA andNon-MENA Countries, Paris: OECD.
OECD (2013), Addressing Base Erosion and Profit Shifting, Paris: OECD.
Public Accounts Committee (2012), Oral Evidence Taken Before the Public Accounts Committee, Monday 12 November 2012
Ruding Report (1992), Report of the Committee of Independent Experts on Company Taxation, Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
Shaxson, N. and O’Hagen, E. (2013), A Competitive Tax System is a Better Tax System, Tax Justice Network and NEF (new economics foundation).
TASC (2012), Tax Injustice Following the Tax Trail, Dublin TASC, available at http://www.tascnet.ie/.
Tax Justice Network (2007), Identifying Tax Havens and Offshore Financial Centres, Tax Justice Network, available at http://www.taxjustice.net/cms/upload/ pdf/Identifying_Tax_Havens_Jul_07.pdf. (Accessed 24 May 2013.)
UNCLAD (1998), United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCLAD) (1998). World Investment Report. New York, United Nations, available at http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.178.3894&rep=rep 1 & type=pdf. (Accessed 24 May 2013.)
US Senate Joint Committee on Taxation (2003), Report of Investigation of Enron Corporation and Related Entities Regarding Federal Tax and Compensation Issues and Policy Recommendation. Washington: Government, Printing Office, available at http://www.jct.gov/s-3-03-voll.pdf. (Accessed 24 May 2013.)
US Senate Permanent Committee on Investigations (2013), Offshore Profit Shifting and the U.S. Tax Code — Part 2 (Apple Inc.), 21 May 2013
US Senate Permanent Committee on Investigations (2003), The Tax Shelter Industry: The Role of Accountants, Lawyers and Financial Professionals. Washington DC: US Senate, available at http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CPRT-108SPRT90655/pdf/ CPRT-108SPRT90655.pdf. (Accessed 24 May 2013.)
Varley, D. (2007), Review of Tax Policy in Northern Ireland, available at http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.178.3894&rep=repl& type=pdf. (Accessed 24 May 2013.)
Wilson, J. (1999), “Theories of Tax Competition’, National Tax Journal, 52, pp. 269–304.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Jim Stewart
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stewart, J. (2014). Low Corporate Tax Rates and Economic Development. In: Brennan, L. (eds) Enacting Globalization. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137361943_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137361943_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-47246-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-36194-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)