Abstract
The use of Critical Friends Groups (CFGs) is more common in the K-12 environment, and has “been shown to make valuable contributions to learning and school improvement in a range of contexts” (Swaffield, 2004, p. 268). There is limited discussion in the literature of the use of CFGs in the discipline of higher education or within higher education organizations themselves. The purpose of this chapter is to explore the use of CFGs in the reform efforts of redefining an online education doctorate (EdD) in the discipline of higher education at Texas Tech University (TTU). Of specific focus in this discussion is how CFGs have been and continue to be instrumental in the redefinition of the online EdD at TTU. The redefinition of the EdD in higher education at TTU utilizes the Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate (CPED) framework. CPED, in itself, serves as a CFG to all members of the project, who work together and discuss how to redefine and enhance the EdD. TTU’ s College of Education—higher education program—is a second wave member of CPED and is one of the few that is redefining its EdD in higher education, based on the CPED framework, within an online environment.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Carnegie Classification of Higher Education Institutions. (n.d.). Texas Tech University. Retrieved from http://classifications.carnegiefoundation.org/lookup_listings/view_institution.php?unit_id=229115&start_page=institution.php&clq=%7B%22first_letter%22%3A%22T%22%7D.
Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate. (2013). Design concept definitions. Retrieved from http://cpedinitiative.org/design-concept-definitions.
Costa, A. L., & Kallick, B. (1993). Through the lens of a critical friend. Educational Leadership, 51(2), 49–51.
Ford, R. C., & Dickson, D. (2012). Enhancing customer self-efficacy in co-producing their service experiences. Business Horizons, 55(2), 179–188.
Munger, M. C. (2010, September). 10 Tips on how to write less badly. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/10-Tips-on-How-to-Write-Less/124268/.
Perry, J. A. (2012, September). To EdD or not to EdD? Kappan, 41–44.
Shulman, L. S., Golde, C., Bueschel, A. C., & Garabedian, K. (2006). Reclaiming education’s doctorates: A critique and a proposal. Educational Researcher, 35(2), 25–32.
Shults, C. (2001). The critical impact of impending retirements on community college leadership. Research brief leadership series, no. 1, AACC-RB-01–5. Washington, DC: American Association of Community Colleges.
Storey, V. A., & Richard, B. M. (2013a). National Council of Professors of Educational Administration (NCPEA) reviewers anCarnegie Project of the Educational Doctorate: The role of critical friends in diffusing doctoral program innovationd the 2013 International Editorial Advisory Panel of Global Scholar.
Storey, V. A. & Richard, B. (2013b, April). Why do students choose a professional doctorate in education: A comparison of motivations, perceptions, and outcomes between the U.S. and the U.K. Presented at the 2013 International Conference on Doctoral Education. Orlando, FL.
Swaffield, S. (2003, October). Critical friendship. [Inform No. 3] Leadership for learning. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Faculty of Education. Retrieved from http://www.educ.cam.ac.uk/centres/lfl/current/inform/Inform_3_Critical_Friendship.pdf
Swaffield, S. (2004). Critical friends: Supporting leadership, improved learning. Improving Schools, 7(3), 267–278.
Texas Tech University (2011). Higher Education Doctoral Programs. Retrieved from http://cms.educ.ttu.edu/academic-programs/psychology-and-leadership/higher-education/doctoral-programs.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2013 Valerie A. Storey
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jones, S.J. (2013). Critical Friends Groups and Their Role in the Redefinition of the Online EdD in Higher Education Administration at Texas Tech University. In: Storey, V.A. (eds) Redesigning Professional Education Doctorates. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137358295_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137358295_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-47214-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-35829-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Education CollectionEducation (R0)