Skip to main content

Critical Friends Groups and Their Role in the Redefinition of the Online EdD in Higher Education Administration at Texas Tech University

  • Chapter
Redesigning Professional Education Doctorates

Abstract

The use of Critical Friends Groups (CFGs) is more common in the K-12 environment, and has “been shown to make valuable contributions to learning and school improvement in a range of contexts” (Swaffield, 2004, p. 268). There is limited discussion in the literature of the use of CFGs in the discipline of higher education or within higher education organizations themselves. The purpose of this chapter is to explore the use of CFGs in the reform efforts of redefining an online education doctorate (EdD) in the discipline of higher education at Texas Tech University (TTU). Of specific focus in this discussion is how CFGs have been and continue to be instrumental in the redefinition of the online EdD at TTU. The redefinition of the EdD in higher education at TTU utilizes the Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate (CPED) framework. CPED, in itself, serves as a CFG to all members of the project, who work together and discuss how to redefine and enhance the EdD. TTU’ s College of Education—higher education program—is a second wave member of CPED and is one of the few that is redefining its EdD in higher education, based on the CPED framework, within an online environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Carnegie Classification of Higher Education Institutions. (n.d.). Texas Tech University. Retrieved from http://classifications.carnegiefoundation.org/lookup_listings/view_institution.php?unit_id=229115&start_page=institution.php&clq=%7B%22first_letter%22%3A%22T%22%7D.

  • Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate. (2013). Design concept definitions. Retrieved from http://cpedinitiative.org/design-concept-definitions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, A. L., & Kallick, B. (1993). Through the lens of a critical friend. Educational Leadership, 51(2), 49–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, R. C., & Dickson, D. (2012). Enhancing customer self-efficacy in co-producing their service experiences. Business Horizons, 55(2), 179–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munger, M. C. (2010, September). 10 Tips on how to write less badly. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/10-Tips-on-How-to-Write-Less/124268/.

  • Perry, J. A. (2012, September). To EdD or not to EdD? Kappan, 41–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S., Golde, C., Bueschel, A. C., & Garabedian, K. (2006). Reclaiming education’s doctorates: A critique and a proposal. Educational Researcher, 35(2), 25–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shults, C. (2001). The critical impact of impending retirements on community college leadership. Research brief leadership series, no. 1, AACC-RB-01–5. Washington, DC: American Association of Community Colleges.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storey, V. A., & Richard, B. M. (2013a). National Council of Professors of Educational Administration (NCPEA) reviewers anCarnegie Project of the Educational Doctorate: The role of critical friends in diffusing doctoral program innovationd the 2013 International Editorial Advisory Panel of Global Scholar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storey, V. A. & Richard, B. (2013b, April). Why do students choose a professional doctorate in education: A comparison of motivations, perceptions, and outcomes between the U.S. and the U.K. Presented at the 2013 International Conference on Doctoral Education. Orlando, FL.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Swaffield, S. (2003, October). Critical friendship. [Inform No. 3] Leadership for learning. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Faculty of Education. Retrieved from http://www.educ.cam.ac.uk/centres/lfl/current/inform/Inform_3_Critical_Friendship.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Swaffield, S. (2004). Critical friends: Supporting leadership, improved learning. Improving Schools, 7(3), 267–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Texas Tech University (2011). Higher Education Doctoral Programs. Retrieved from http://cms.educ.ttu.edu/academic-programs/psychology-and-leadership/higher-education/doctoral-programs.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Valerie A. Storey

Copyright information

© 2013 Valerie A. Storey

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jones, S.J. (2013). Critical Friends Groups and Their Role in the Redefinition of the Online EdD in Higher Education Administration at Texas Tech University. In: Storey, V.A. (eds) Redesigning Professional Education Doctorates. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137358295_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics