Skip to main content

Abstract

One of our co-authors, whose identity we will protect, is not what most would describe as a snazzy-dresser, unless his wife intercedes and picks out his clothes for some special event and then of course he looks very dapper. He’s proud of this lack of style and when we began discussing how people tie their self-identity to their clothes, he was quick to point out that he must not be one of those individuals. Unfortunately for him, this isn’t true. Our self-identity plays a larger role in many aspects of our lives than most of us like to admit — one of the co-authors especially. As the cognitive scientist, Donald Norman, in his 2007 book, Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things, states, ‘Even those who deny any interest in how others view them actually do care, if only by making sure that everyone else understands that they don’t. The way we dress and behave, the material objects we possess, jewelry and watches, cars and homes, all are public expressions of our selves.’1 This concept of using clothes, body art, or material possessions to display our self-identity is deeply rooted in the reflective level of the brain and highly dependent upon cultural norms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 37.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. D. A. Norman (2007) Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things (Basic Books), p. 53.

    Google Scholar 

  2. W. J. McGuire (1984) ‘Search for the self: Going beyond self-esteem and the reactive self, Personality and the Prediction of Behavior, 73, p. 120.

    Google Scholar 

  3. H. Dittmar (1992) ‘Perceived material wealth and first impressions’, British Journal of Social Psychology, 31(4), pp. 379–91; R. W. Belk (1988) ‘Possessions and the extended self, Journal of Consumer Research, pp. 139–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. J. O’Shaughnessy and N. J. O’Shaughnessy (2002) ‘Marketing, the consumer society and hedonism’, European Journal of Marketing, 36(5/6), pp. 524–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. R. L. Oliver (1999) ‘Whence consumer loyalty?’, The Journal of Marketing, pp. 33–44.

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. Eisler (1997) ‘When your team takes a tumble, Guys go awry over losing’, USA Today.

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. Schriver (1997) ‘Customer loyalty: Going, going’, American Demographics, 19(9), pp. 20–3.

    Google Scholar 

  8. E. Sivadas and J. L. Baker-Prewitt (2000) ‘An examination of the relationship between service quality, customer satisfaction, and store loyalty’, International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 28(2), pp. 73–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. A. Tapp (2004) ‘The loyalty of football fans. We’ll support you evermore?’, The Journal of Database Marketing & Customer Strategy Management, 11(3), pp. 203–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tapp, ‘The loyalty of football fans’.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. W. Pimentel and K.E. Reynolds (2004) ‘A model for consumer devotion: affective commitment with proactive sustaining behaviors’, Academy of Marketing Science Review, 5(1); C. M. End et al. (2002) ‘Identifying With Winners: A Reexamination of Sport Fans’ Tendency to BIRG’, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(5), pp. 1017–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. See Bleacher Report, ‘The Craziest Sports Fans Ever’, http://bleach-erreport.com/articles/1049509–;50-craziest-sports-fans-ever

  13. See SFGate 49ers, ‘Kyle Williams receiving death threats after NFC Championship’, http://blog.sfgate.corn/49ers/2012/01/23/kyle-williams-receiving-death-threats-after-nfc-championship/

  14. See, Daily Motion, http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xajol7_saturn-vs-spartak-moscow-fan-penalt_sport#.URKrnEFr Hd-M

  15. See The Off Side, http://www.theoffside.com/world-football/brazilian-fan-threatens-suicide-after-relegation.html

  16. See Goal, http://www.goal.eom/en/news/9/england/2009/05/06/1249557/kenyan-fan-commits-suicide-after-arsenals-champions~league-defea

  17. H. Blumer (1969)’ social movements’, Studies in Social Movements: A Social Psychological Perspective, pp. 8–29.

    Google Scholar 

  18. E. R. Hirt et al. (1992) ‘Costs and benefits of allegiance: Changes in fans’ self-ascribed competencies after team victory versus defeat’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(5), p. 724; D. L. Wann and N. R. Branscombe (1990) ‘Die-hard and fair-weather fans: Effects of identification on BIRGing and CORFing tendencies’, Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 14(2), pp. 103–17

    Google Scholar 

  19. R. B. Cialdini et al. (1976) ‘Basking in reflected glory: Three (football) field studies’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(3), p. 366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. T. Esch and G. B. Stefano (2005) ‘The neurobiology of love’, Neuro endocrinology Letters, 26(3), pp. 175–92.

    Google Scholar 

  21. J. A. Peterson and R. Martens (1972) ‘Success and residential affiliation as determinants of team cohesiveness’, Research Quarterly, 43(1), pp. 62–76.

    Google Scholar 

  22. D. A. Snow and P. E. Oliver (1995)’ social movements and collective behavior: Social psychological dimensions and considerations’, Sociological Perspectives on Social Psychology, pp. 571–99.

    Google Scholar 

  23. See H-D History, http://www.harley-davidson.com/en_US/Content/Pages/HD_Museum/explore/hd-history.html

  24. See HotBike, ‘American Machine Foundry — Journey Into History’, http://www.hotbikeweb.com/features/0701_hbkp_american_mach ine_foundry/

  25. See Harley-Davidson, Community, http://www.harley-davidson.com/en_US/Content/Pages/Community/community.html?locale=en_USôcbmLocale=en_US

  26. J. W. Schouten and J. H. McAlexander (1995)’ subcultures of consumption: An ethnography of the new bikers’, Journal of Consumer Research, pp. 43–61.

    Google Scholar 

  27. R. Clifton (2004) Brands and Branding (John Wiley ôc Sons).

    Google Scholar 

  28. B. Deutsch (2010) ‘Luxury products or luxury experiences? Let me tell you a story...’, Luxury Society, 24 Aug. 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  29. L. Mannetti, A. Pierro and S. Livi (2002) ‘Explaining Consumer Conduct: From Planned to Self-Expressive behavior’, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(7), pp. 1431–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. W. James (1890) Principles of Psychology (University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Belk, ‘Possessions’.

    Google Scholar 

  32. M. Featherstone (2000) ‘Body modification: An introduction’, Body Modification, p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  33. See Statistic Brain, http://www.statisticbrain.com/tattoo-statistics/

  34. See MeDermis Laser Clinic, http://www.medermislaserclinic.com/free-tattoo-infographic/

  35. D. Hakim,’ selling the Sizzle’, The New York Times, 9 July 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  36. R. A. Lutz (1998) Guts: The Seven Laws of Business that Made Chrysler the World’s Hottest Car Company (Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Automotive News (2004) ‘U.S. Car Sales, December and 12 Months 2003’, Crain Communications, Detroit.

    Google Scholar 

  38. C. Isidore, ‘GM: Hybrid Cars Make No Sense’, CNN/Money Online, 6 Jan. 2004, http://money.cnn.com/2004/01/06/pf/autos/detroit_gm_hybrids/

  39. Automotive News (2005) ‘U.S. Car Sales, December and 12 Months 2004’. Crain Communications, Detroit.

    Google Scholar 

  40. C. Isidore, ‘Detroit Learning to Love Hybrids’, CNN/Money Online, 12 Jan. 2005, http://money.cnn.com/2005/01/12/pf/autos/autoshow_hybrids/

  41. C. Calvert (2004) Voyeur Nation: Media, Privacy, and Peering in Modern Culture (Basic Books).

    Google Scholar 

  42. S. Harris and E. Gerich (1996) ‘Retiring the NSFNET Backbone Service: Chronicling the End of an Era’, Connexions, 10.

    Google Scholar 

  43. See Facebook, Key Facts, http://newsroom.fb.com/Key-Facts

  44. D. Ariely, ‘How Online Companies Get You to Share More and Spend More’, Wired Magazine, 20 June 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  45. S. D. Gosling et al. (2002) ‘A room with a cue: personality judgments based on offices and bedrooms’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(3), p. 379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. L. Nakamura (2002) Cyhertypes: Race, ethnicity, and identity on the Internet (Psychology Press).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Calvert, Voyeur Nation.

    Google Scholar 

  48. M. Jones (2010) ‘Mediated Exhibitionism The Naked Body in Performance and Virtual Space’, Sexuality & Culture, 14(4), p. 262.

    Google Scholar 

  49. America n Psychiatric As so ciatio n (2000) D iagnostic and S tatistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-IV-TR (American Psychiatric Publishing).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Calvert, Voyeur Nation, p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  51. M. Fisher et al. (2011) ‘The Co-production of Social Contagion: A Comparative Analysis of Two Social Networking Sites’, in Academy of Management OCIS E-commerce and Service Innovation, Session 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  52. A. Munar (2010) ‘Digital Exhibitionism: The Age of Exposure’, Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research, 4, p. 401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. H. Koskela (2002) ‘Webcams, TV shows and mobile phones: Empowering exhibitionism’, Surveillance & Society, 2(2/3), pp. 199–215.

    Google Scholar 

  54. F. D. Davis (1989) ‘Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology’, MIS Quarterly, pp. 319–40.

    Google Scholar 

  55. M. E. Adams, G. S. Day and D. Dougherty (1998) ‘Enhancing New Product Development Performance: An Organizational Learning Perspective’, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15(5), p. 403–22.

    Google Scholar 

  56. E. Von Hippel, S. Thomke and M. Sonnack (1999) ‘Creating breakthroughs at 3M’, Harvard Business Review, 77, pp. 47–57.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2014 Michael Fisher, Martin Abbott, and Kalle Lyytinen

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fisher, M., Abbott, M., Lyytinen, K. (2014). Seeing and Being Seen. In: The Power of Customer Misbehavior. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137348920_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics