Skip to main content

Vindicating Women’s Rights in a Fetocentric State: The Longest Irish Journey

  • Chapter
Theory on the Edge

Part of the book series: Breaking Feminist Waves ((BFW))

Abstract

Ailbhe Smyth’s statement above captured the anger and frustration felt by many in 1992, the year in which the Attorney General (AG) of Ireland, Harry Whelehan, obtained an injunction barring a 14-year-old girl, who had been raped by a family friend, from having an abortion in England. Her case, known as the X case, brought home how savagely Ireland’s ban on abortion could impact on a young girl and her family. This anger, particularly of women, also threatened ratification of the Maastricht Treaty when it emerged that, in 1991, the government had negotiated a secret protocol to the Treaty ensuring that European Community law could not override Article 40:3.3 of the Irish Constitution, the prohibition on abortion (Smyth, 1992: 17-21). In effect, it denied Irish women future rights under European law enjoyed by women in other states. Thousands demonstrated in the streets to support the girl and her family and protest against a regime in which those seeking abortions, and anyone helping them, were criminalized (Bacik, 2004: 117). Smyth accurately summed up events in 1992 as a “tragic farce” played out in a male-controlled society, where the “foetocentric rhetoric and ethics” of the dominant Catholic Church dictated policy on reproduction (Smyth, 1992: 22). An appeal to the Supreme Court, however, resulted in the landmark decision that Ireland’s constitutional ban on abortion did not apply if “it is established as a matter of probability that there is a real and substantial risk to the life, as distinct from the health” of a woman including (as the girl was by then suicidal) the risk of suicide.

But while the farce-makers act out their sadistic joke on the public stage, women in Ireland considering or seeking abortions abroad continue to do so in private anguish, uncertain about the legal status of their actions and without the information and practical support which would help to make their journey less traumatic.

—Smyth, 1992: 10

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • All Party Oireachtas Committee on the Constitution Constitutional Review Group Report (1996). Dublin: Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • All-Party Oireachtas Committee on the Constitution, Fifth Progress Report: Abortion (2000). Dublin: Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (1983) “Taoiseach warns on wording.” Irish Times, September 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, Mavis and Kirby, Peadar (eds) (1982) The Abortion Referendum: The Case Against. Dublin: Anti-Amendment Campaign.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacik, Ivana (2004) Kicking and Screaming: Dragging Ireland into the 21st Century. Dublin: O’Brien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, Orla (2010) “Delivering Support to Women in a Crisis Pregnancy.” Irish Examiner, April 26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, Maureen (1983) “Why I Intend to Vote ‘No’.” Cork Examiner, August 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulter, Carol (2002) “A Yes Vote Will Protect Doctors.” Irish Times, February 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2010) “No Overall Policy on Operation of Ethics Bodies in HSE Hospitals.” Irish Times, December 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Barra, Deirdre (2002) “Letter to the Editor.” Irish Times, February 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devlin, Martina (2002) “Urban Female Vote Helped Save the Day for No Camp.” Irish Independent, March 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2009) “A Woman’s Plight Exposes Our Hypocrisy on Abortion.” Irish Independent, September 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Editorial (1983) “The Second Partitioning of Ireland.” Irish Times, August 30.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2002) “Apathy and Uncertainty over Issue. Irish Examiner, February 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Favier, Mary (2008) “GPs and the Silence around Abortion.” Forum, May: 19–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girvin, Brian (1986) “Social Change and Moral Politics: The Irish Constitutional Referendum 1983.” Political Studies, 34: 61–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green Paper on Abortion (1999). Dublin: Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healey, Morgan (2008) “‘I Don’t Want to Get into This, It’s Too Controversial.’ How Irish Women Politicians Conceptualise the Abortion Debate,” in J. Schweppe (ed.), The Unborn Child, Article 40.3.3° and Abortion in Ireland: 25 Years of Protection? Dublin: Liffey Press, pp. 65–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2009) “The ‘Naturalized’ Politician: How Irish Women Politicians Construct their Political Subjectivities.” Unpublished PhD thesis. University of Limerick.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesketh, Tom (1990). The Second Partitioning of Ireland: The Abortion Referendum of1983. Dublin: Brandsma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornsby-Smith, Michael, P., and Whelan, Christopher T. (1994) “Religious and Moral Values,” in C. Whelan (ed.), Values and Social Change in Ireland. Dublin: Gill and Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hug, Chrystel (1999) The Politics of Sexual Morality in Ireland. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Human Rights Watch (2010) A State of Isolation: Access to Abortion for Women in Ireland. New York: Human Rights Watch.

    Google Scholar 

  • IFPA (2000) The Irish Journey: Women’s Stories of Abortion. Dublin: Irish Family Planning Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahon, Evelyn (2001). “Abortion Debates in Ireland an Ongoing Issue,” in D. McBride Stetson (ed.), Abortion Politics, Women’s Movements and the Democratic State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 157–179.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • — (2002) “Abortion Referendum as Proposed Is Invalid.” Irish Times, February 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay, Susan (2002) “‘Yes’ or ‘No’ Vote, There’s Still the Boat.” Sunday Tribune, March 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, John A. (2002) “Ahern’s TV Debate Snub Cost Him Dear.” Sunday Independent, March 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, Carl (2008) “Council of Europe Calls on Ireland to Legislate for Abortion.” Irish Times, April 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2010) “Why is Simple Treatment Not Available Even When a Mother’s Life Is at Risk?” Irish Times, December 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Mahony, Rev. Brendan (1982) “A Catholic View.” Irish Times, May 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, Emily (2002) “Another Fine Mess.” Sunday Times, March 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossiter, Ann (2009) Ireland’s Hidden Diaspora: The “Abortion Trail” and the Making of a London-Irish Underground, 1980–2000. London: IASC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweppe, Jennifer (2008) “A ‘Constitutionally Permissible’ Abortion? The Right to Travel, the Role of the Medical Profession and the Duty of the HSE,” in J. Schweppe (ed.), The Unborn Child, Article 40.3.3° and Abortion in Ireland: 25 Years of Protection? Dublin: Liffey Press, pp. 349–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, Kathy (2012a) “Stories of Abortion.” Irish Times, February 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2012b) “Stories of Abortion.” Irish Times, March 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, Ailbhe (1983) Women’s Rights in Ireland. Dublin: Irish Council for Civil Liberties.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1992) “A Sadistic Farce. Women and Abortion in the Republic of Ireland, 1992,” in A. Smyth (ed.), The Abortion Papers Ireland. Dublin: Attic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, Lisa (2005) Abortion and Nation: The Politics of Reproduction in Contemporary Ireland. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

Author’s Collection

  1. Alliance for a No Vote (ANV) leaflets 2001–2002.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Doctors for Choice in Ireland (DFC) leaflet (undated).

    Google Scholar 

  3. NWCI 2002 Consultation document on the proposed referendum.

    Google Scholar 

  4. NWCI Press Release, February 2, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  5. 25th Amendment of the Constitution (Protection of Human Life in Pregnancy) Bill: www.oireachtas.ie/viewdoc.asp?fn=/documents/bills28/bills/2001/4801/default.htm, date accessed July 23, 2012.

  6. ABC Case: Statement of Facts, ECHR: www.eclj.org/PDF/081118_ECLJ_StatementofFacts7May2008.pdf, date accessed April 6, 2010.

  7. Action report A, B, and C v. Ireland: Department of Health and Children: www.dohc.ie/publications/pdf/Action_Report.pdf?direct=1, date accessed July 21, 2012.

  8. Action Plan A, B, and C v. Ireland Application no 25579/2005, submitted by the Government of Ireland on June 16, 2011 (press release): www.dohc.ie/press/releases/2011/20110616.html, date accessed July 21, 2012.

  9. Council of Europe Doc. 11576: Committee on Social, Health and Family Affairs report,

    Google Scholar 

  10. Doctors for Choice in Ireland Press Release 2007: http://choiceireland.blogspot.com/2007/05/doctors-for-choice-advocate-safe-and.html, date accessed May 5, 2010.

  11. Dáil Éireann Debate (2012a) Vol. 761, No. 3 (unrevised), April 18: http://debates.oireachtas.ie/dail/2012/04/18/00025.asp, date accessed 23 July 2012.

  12. Dáil Éireann Debate (2012b) Vol. 762, No. 1 (unrevised), April 19: http://debates.oireachtas.ie/dail/2012/04/19/00006.asp, date accessed July 23, 2012.

  13. ECHR Judgement: CASE OF A, B, AND C v. Ireland (Application no. 25579/05), including dissenting opinion, Web: http://cmiskp.echr.coe.int/tkp197/view.asp?item=1&portal=hbkm&action=html&high light=Ireland%20%7C%2025579/05&sessionid=82006301&skin=hudoc-en, date accessed December 16, 2010.

  14. ECHR podcast of A, B and C cases: www.echr.coe.int/ECHR/EN/Header/Press/Multimedia/Webcasts+of+public+he arings/webcastEN_media?&p_url=20091209–1/lang/, date accessed April 10, 2010.

  15. Elections Ireland: http://electionsireland.org/results/referendum/summary.cfm, date accessed April 10, 2010.

  16. European Council Conclusions June 2009: http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=DOC/09/2&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en, date accessed April 10, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Health Service Executive (HSE) Press Release, May 25, 2010: www.irishpressreleases.ie/2010/05/25/number-of-women-giving-irish-addresses-at-uk-abortion-clinics-decreases-for-eighth-year-in-a-row-according-to-department-of-health-uk/, date accessed May 29, 2010.

  18. Irish Family Planning Association (IFPAa) Statistics Numbers of Irish Women Having Abortions in (a) the UK 1980–2011 and (b) the Netherlands 2005–2010: www.ifpa.ie/Hot-Topics/Abortion/Statistics, date accessed July 21, 2012.

  19. Irish Family Planning Association (IFPAb) Press Release: www.ifpa.ie/eng/Media-Info-Centre/News-Events/2009-News-Events/IFPA-Responds-to-Latest-UK- Abortion-Stats, date accessed May 21, 2009.

  20. Kingston, James (2001), Irish Council for Civil Liberties, Position Paper (2001) The Need for Abortion Law Reform in Ireland: The Case against the Twenty-Fifth Amendment of the Constitution Bill, 2001: www.iccl.ie/the-need-for-abortion-law-reform-in-ireland-the-case-against-the-twenty-fifth-amendment-of-the-constitution-bill-2001.html, date accessed August 2, 2012.

  21. Statistical Bulletin, May 2010 “Abortion Statistics, England and Wales: 2009.” UK Dept. of Health: www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/documents/digitalass et/dh_116336.pdf, date accessed June 4, 2010.

  22. Medical Treatment (Termination of Pregnancy in Case of Risk to Life of Pregnant Woman) Bill 2012 [PMB]: www.oireachtas.ie/viewdoc.asp?fn=/documents/bills28/bills/2012/1012/b1012d.pdf, date accessed July 23, 2012.

  23. Women’s Health Council Statement, January 31, 2001: www.whc.ie/publications/86, date accessed May 22, 2010.

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Noreen Giffney Margrit Shildrick

Copyright information

© 2013 Noreen Giffney and Margrit Shildrick

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McAvoy, S. (2013). Vindicating Women’s Rights in a Fetocentric State: The Longest Irish Journey. In: Giffney, N., Shildrick, M. (eds) Theory on the Edge. Breaking Feminist Waves. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137315472_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics