Abstract
A black-and-white photograph from 1934 preserved in FIAT’s archives shows the company’s founder Giovanni Agnelli and Henry Ford standing outside a Detroit plant.1 The two men appear dignified and self-confident, yet with a stern gaze befitting to the blighted prospects of the Depression era economy. At the time the joint portrait was taken, Agnelli and Ford were elderly men each heading two of the most powerful corporations in their respective countries. Most Americans who owned a car in the 1930s would have driven one manufactured in Detroit, most probably by Ford; by the same token, the majority of Italian car owners bought a FIAT. Agnelli had long been fascinated by Ford. He had first visited Detroit in 1906, and returned to the city again and again, modeling his two most productive Turinese plants on Ford’s flagship plants.2 However, the Atlantic crossing was more frequently made by FIAT engineers eager to learn from and report on the rise of mass production in the Motor City. In 1919, when FIAT was still based on craftsmanship, a Turinese engineer was struck by the “well-organized shops” and “the intensity of the individual tasks” he found in the Michigan plants. Workers toiled as hard as if they were doing piecework—he noticed—but their effort was the result of “continuous and automatic production,” not of the incentive of a reward; “workers who are unsuitable, incapable, slow, or lazy cannot resist. They are automatically selected and removed from production.”3
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Valerio Castronovo, Giovanni Agnelli (Torino: UTET, 1971), 528.
Duccio Bigazzi “Management Strategies in the Italian Car Industry 1906–1945: Fiat and Alfa Romeo,” in Steven Tolliday and Jonathan Zeitlin, eds., The Automobile Industry and Its Workers. Between Fordism and Flexibility (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1986), 76–95.
Carlo Olmo, ed., Il Lingotto, 1915–1939: ’architettura, l’immagine, il lavoro (Torino: Allemandi, 1994).
Duccio Bigazzi, “Modelli e pratiche organizzative dell’industrializzazione Italiana,” in Storia D’Italia. L’industria (Torino: Einaudi, 1999);
Jonathan Zeitlin and Gary Herrigel, eds. Americanisation and Its Limits: Reworking US Technology and Management in Postwar Europe and Japan (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1999);
P. Cioccae and G. Toniolo, eds. L’economia italiana nel periodo fascista (Bologna: Il Mulino, 1976).
Stefano Musso, “Production Methods and Industrial Relations at FIAT (1930–90)” in Fordism Transformed. The Development of Production Methods in the Automobile Industry, Haruhito Shiomi and Kazuo Wada, eds. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995), 245–248.
Piero Bairati, Vittorio Valletta (Turin: Utet, 1983) 158–163;
Gianfranco Zunini, “Struttura industriale, sviluppo tecnologico e movimento operaio a Torino nel secondo dopoguerra,” in Ettore Passerin, ed., Movimento operaio e sviluppo economico in Piemonte negli ultimi cinquant’anni (Torino: Cassa di Risparmio, 1978), 61–128.
Comitato Interministeriale per la Ricostruzione (CIR), Lo sviluppo dell’economia Italiana nel quadro della ricostruzione e della cooperazione europea (Roma, 1952).
Charles Maier and Gunther Bischof, eds. The Marshall Plan and Germany (Oxford: Berg, 1991);
Bigazzi, “Mirafiori e il modello americano,” in Carlo Olmo ed., Mirafiori, (Torino: Allemandi, 1987) 259;
Lawrence J. White, The Automobile Industry since 1945 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971) 213–215.
Jonathan Zeitlin, Introduction to Americanization and Its Limits: Reworking US Technology and Management in Post-War Europe and Japan, Jonathan Zeitlin and Gary Herrigel, eds. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), 1–50.
Jeffrey W. Cody, Exporting American Architecture, 1870–2000 (London: Routledge, 2003), 133.
Charles S. Maier, “The Politics of Productivity: Foundations of American International Economic Policy after World War II,” in Charles S. Maier, In Search of Stability. Explorations in Historical Political Economy (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1987), 121–52.
Bent Boel, The European Productivity Agency and Transatlantic Relations, 1953–1961 (Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press, 2003).
Luciano Segreto, “Sceptics and Ungrateful Friends V. Dreaming Social Engineers: The Italian Business Community, the Italian Government, the United States and the Comitato Nazionale per la Produttività,” in Terry Gourvish, ed., Missionaries and Managers: American Influences on European Management Education, 1945–60 (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1998), 77–94.
Nick Tiratsoo and Jim Tomlinson, “Exporting the ‘Gospel of Productivity’: United States Technical Assistance and the British Industry 1945–1960,” The Business History Review 71, no. 1 (Spring 1997): 41–81.
G. Bianchi, “Il Comitato nazionale per la produttività: 1951–1955,” in Annali della Fondazione Giulio Pastore 22 (1993);
Direzione Informazioni del Gruppo Fiat, Fiat in Cifre (Torino: Fiat, 1974);
Archivio Storico Fiat, Fiat: le fasi della crescita. Tempi e cifre dello sviluppo aziendale (Torino: Scriptorium, 1996), 98.
Gabriele Morello, “Indagine sul grado di organizzazione delle aziende italiane,” Rivista di organizzazione aziendale 1, no. 1 (1957);
H. B. Maynard, G. J. Stegemerten, J. L. Schwab, Methods-Time Measurement (New York: McGraw Hill, 1948);
James R. Bright, Automation and Management (Boston: Harvard University Press, 1958), 4.
Haruhito Shiomi and Kazuo Wada, eds., Fordism Transformed. The Development of Production Methods in the Automobile Industry (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995), 49–86.
Norbert Wiener, Cybernetics, Or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine (New York: Wiley, 1948);
Norbert Wiener, The Human Use of Human Beings (Boston: Doubleday, 1950) 189;
David F. Noble, Forces of Production (New York: Knopf, 1984), 71–76.
David Steigerwald, “Walter Reuther, the UAW, and the Dilemmas of Automation,” Labor History 51, no. 3 (2010): 429–453.
Reuben E. Slesinger, “The Pace of Automation: An American View,” Journal of Industrial Economics 6, no. 3 (1958): 243.
Walter Reuther, Congressional Testimony to the Committee on Automation, 1960, printed in Automation. Implications for the Future, Morris Philipson, ed. (New York: Vintage Books, 1962), 282.
Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Convegno internazionale sui problemi dell’automatismo (Roma: Consiglio Nazionale Ricerche, 2000).
Robert Harle, American Trade Unions and Automation (Paris: Trade Union Information and Research Service, European Productivity Agency, Organization for European Economic Cooperation, 1958).
Olinto Sassi, “Limiti di convenienza economica di applicazione dell’automazione in alcune produzioni industriali” in Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Convegno internazionale sui problemi dell’automatismo (Milano: CNR, 1956), 887–907.
Copyright information
© 2013 Nicola Pizzolato
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pizzolato, N. (2013). The “American Model” in Turin. In: Challenging Global Capitalism. Palgrave Macmillan Transnational History Series. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137311702_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137311702_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-45705-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-31170-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)