Skip to main content

Passionate Love in Contemporary Hollywood Romantic Dramas

  • Chapter
Passionate Love and Popular Cinema
  • 546 Accesses

Abstract

The mid-1970s saw a diversification of cinematic products that changed the industry as well as the representation of passionate love. From the 1980s onwards, the number of popular romantic dramas began to rise. The genre flourished as some texts gained commercial success at the box office and others earned a heightened appreciation from popular culture some years after their release. While the films produced in the past three decades employ similar narrative, stylistic and thematic conventions to earlier romantic dramas, a variety of social, political and filmic influences led to significant developments in the genre.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Linda Ruth Williams and Michael Hammond. ‘The 1990s and Beyond: An Introduction’ in Contemporary American Cinema, edited by Linda Ruth Williams and Michael Hammond, 327. London: McGraw-Hill, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Williams and Hammond. ‘The 1990s and Beyond’ 327. Linda Ruth Williams and Michael Hammond. ‘The 1980s: An Introduction’ in Contemporary American Cinema, edited by Linda Ruth Williams and Michael Hammond, 227. London: McGraw-Hill, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Steve Neale and Frank Krutnik. Popular Film and Television Comedy. New York: Routledge, 1990: 172.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See, for example, Lyden. ‘Melodrama, Tearjerkers and “Women’s Films”’ 170. For a discussion of inter-racial relationships, see also James J. Dowd and Nicole R. Pallotta. ‘The End of Romance: Demystification of Love in the Post-Modern Age’ Sociological Perspectives 43, no. 4 (2000): 552.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Diane Elam. Romancing the Postmodern. New York: Routledge, 1992: 13.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Laura Mulvey. ‘Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema’ in Feminist Film Theory Reader, edited by Sue Thornham, 58–69. 1975; Reprint, New York: New York University, 1999; John Berger. Ways of Seeing. London: BBC and Penguin, 1972. There has also been subsequent feedback and counter-arguments to these examinations about the ‘gaze’. See for example Stephen Kern. The Eyes of Love: The Gaze in English and French Paintings and Novels 1840–1900. London: Reaktion Books, 1996. Kern’s time period is different to Berger’s, however, he observes that in his sample the depiction of women suggest they have a ‘wider horizon of visual interests, a broader range of purposes, and more profound, if not more intense, emotions’ (7).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Titanic, directed by James Cameron (1997; Moore Park, NSW: Twentieth Century Home Entertainment, 2005), DVD

    Google Scholar 

  8. Time in James Cameron’s Titanic’ Journal of Popular Film and Television 26, no. 4 (Winter 1999): 164.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Helen Gurley Brown. Sex and the Single Girl. Fort Lee: Barricade, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cas Wouters. Sex and Manners: Female Emancipation in the West, 1890–2000. London: Sage Publications, 2004: 126.

    Google Scholar 

  11. James Cameron. ‘Commentary’ Titanic, disc 2, directed by James Cameron, special edn. DVD. 1997; Moore Park, NSW: Twentieth Century Home Entertainment, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Margaret Tally. ‘Something’s Gotta Give: Hollywood, Female Sexuality and the “Older Bird” Chick Flick’ in Chick Flicks: Contemporary Women at the Movies, edited by Suzanne Ferriss and Mallory Young, 120, 130. New York: Routledge, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Patricia Mellancamp. ‘Crisis and Fear at the Movies and in Life, or on Being as Old as My Grandmother’ in Screening Genders, edited by Krin Gabbard and William Luhr, 78–92. New Brunswick, N. J.: Rutgers University Press, 2008. Mellancamp, like Tally, also sees some changes to the age of women and makes reference to The First Wives Club (Hugh Wilson, 1996) and Somethings Gotta Give (Nancy Meyers: 2003). See also Tally. Somethings Gotta Give. 119–131.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Steven J. Zani. ‘Traumatic Disaster and Titanic Recuperation’ Journal of Popular Film and Television 31, no. 2 (Fall 2003): 128. See also, David Lubin. Titanic. London: BFI, 1999: 96, to whom Zani refers.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ashton D. Trice and Samuel A. Holland. Heroes, Antiheroes and Dolts: Portrayals of Masculinity in American Popular Film, 1921–1999. Jefferson: McFarland, 2001: 213.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Trice and Holland. Heroes, Antiheroes and Dolts. 213–214. They also use the male protagonist in Shakespeare in Love as another example.

    Google Scholar 

  17. E. Ann Kaplan. ‘A History of Gender Theory in Cinema Studies’ in Screening Genders, edited and introduction by Krin Gabbard and William Luhr, 23. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stuart Brock. ‘Fictions, Feelings and Emotions’ Philosophical Studies 132 (2007): 221. Brock’s italics.

    Google Scholar 

  19. See, for example, Richard Dyer. Stars. London: BFI, 1982; Christine Gledhill (ed). Stardom: Industry of Desire. London: Routledge, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  20. P. David Marshall. ‘The Cinematic Apparatus and the Construction of the Film Celebrity’ in Cultural Studies: An Anthology, edited by Michael Ryan, 1122. Malden: Blackwell, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Angela McRobbie. ‘More!: New Sexualities in Girls’ and Women’s Magazines’ in Back to Reality?: Social Experience and Cultural Studies, edited by Angela McRobbie, 198–199. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  22. See Trice and Holland. Heroes, Antiheroes and Dolts. 204; Zani. ‘Traumatic Disaster and Titanic Recuperation’ 130.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Andy Seiler. ‘Repeat Viewers Keep Titanic Afloat: Love Story, Historic Tragedy and DiCaprio Keep Them Coming Back’ USA Today. 14 January 1998, D7.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Melanie Nash and Martti Lahti. ‘Almost Ashamed to Say I Am One of those Girls: Titanic, Leonardo DiCaprio, and the Paradoxes of Girls’ Fandom’ in Titanic: Anatomy of a Blockbuster, edited by Kevin S. Sandler and Gaylyn Studlar, 65. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1999. See also Richard Maltby. ‘Taking Hollywood Seriously: The Commercial Aesthetic of Titanic’ in Hollywood Cinema 2nd edn. 11. Malden: Blackwell, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  25. David Ansen. ‘Our Titanic love affair’ Newsweek (23 February 1998): 46–47.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Melena Ryzik. ‘Hey, Girl. Happy Holidays. To You. To Us’ The New York Times (online). 21 December 2011. Accessed 12 April 2013. carpetbagger. blogs.nytimes.com/2011/12/21/hey-girl-happy-holidays-to-you-to-us.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Williams and Hammond. ‘The 1990s and Beyond’ 326. See also Williams and Hammond. ‘The 1980s’ 225.

    Google Scholar 

  28. R. Serge Denisoff and George Plasketes. ‘Synergy in 1980s Film and Music: Formula for Success or Industry Mythology?’ Film History 4, no. 2 (1990): 257.

    Google Scholar 

  29. David R. Shumway. ‘Rock “n” Roll Soundtracks and the Production of Nostalgia’ Cinema Journal 38, no. 2 (Winter 1999): 36–51.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Celine Dion.com. ‘Lets Talk About Love: 1997’ Sony Music Entertainment Canada Inc. and Five Star Feeling Inc., 1996–2009. Accessed 31 October 2010. http://www.celinedion.com/celinedion/english /music.cgi?albumid=10.

  31. Adrienne Munich and Maura Spiegel. ‘Heart of the Ocean: Diamonds and Democratic Desire in Titanic’ in Titanic: Anatomy of a Blockbuster, edited by Kevin S. Sandler and Gaylyn Studlar, 163. New Brunswick, N. J.: Rutgers University Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  32. See, ‘Multiple Grammy Winner Celine Dion’s music video “My Heart Will Go On”’ Titanic, directed by James Cameron (1997; Moore Park, NSW: Twentieth Century Home Entertainment, 2005), special ed. DVD.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Maltby. ‘Taking Hollywood Seriously’ 12; Richard Maltby. Hollywood Cinema 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell, 2003: 300.

    Google Scholar 

  34. The Notebook, DVD See also Josh Grant. ‘The Book of Love: Romantic Love in Nick Cassavetes’ The Notebook’ unpublished essay (online). 30 November 2009. Accessed 31 May 2010. http://www.westga.edu/-jgrant/Love/The %20Notebook%20Sample.doc. As Josh Grant notes. The Notebook mirrors Ovid’s classical tale of Baucis and Philemon in the eighth book of his Metamorphoses, in which the supreme God Zeus makes the two elderly lovers into entwining trees upon their deaths, granting their wish to be together forever. Ovid. Metamorphoses. Tanslation by A. D. Melville, introduction and notes by E. J. Kenney. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987. see in particular Book VIII.

  35. Todd F. Davis and Kenneth Womack. ‘Narrating the Ship of Dreams: The Ethics of Sentimentality in James Cameron’s TitanicJournal of Popular Film and Television 29, no. 1 (Spring 2001): 47. See also Lyden ‘Melodrama, Tearjerkers and “Women’s Films”’ 176. He says that the reunion is a ‘transcendental reality’.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2014 Erica Todd

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Todd, E. (2014). Passionate Love in Contemporary Hollywood Romantic Dramas. In: Passionate Love and Popular Cinema. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137295385_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics