Skip to main content

Teachers’ Conceptualization and Use of the Textbook on a Medical English Course

  • Chapter

Summary

While there have been numerous analyses of second language (L2) English language textbook material, there has been far less research conducted on how teachers use this material in class, and why. This chapter duly focuses on seven English language teachers’ conceptualizations of, and adherence to, their prescribed textbook. The teachers were teaching English to medical students on an English for Specific Purposes (ESP) course at a Saudi Arabian university. Classroom observations were followed up by qualitative interviews to explore teachers’ textbook use and motivations underlying their practices. Teachers held varying views of the textbook, with some describing it using metaphors associated with constraint or tedium while others conceptualized it in more positive terms, using metaphors associated with guidance. Although the textbook played a central role in all the teachers’ lessons, there were variations in the ways teachers adapted the materials to meet their learners’ needs and to best satisfy their own pedagogical preferences and priorities. However, a perceived lack of subject specialist knowledge, a shortage of time, and an exam-driven syllabus all negatively impacted on teachers’ use of and attitudes towards the textbook. The implications of this study are explored, particularly for teacher development within ESP contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allwright, R.L. (1981). What do we want teaching materials for? ELT Journal, 36, 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvermann, D.E. (1987). The role of textbooks in teachers’ interactive decision making. Reading Research and Instruction, 26, 115–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, G., Hen, K., and Nihlen, A. (2007). Studying your own school. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apple, M.W. and Jungck, S. (1990). ‘You don’t have to be a teacher to teach this unit’: Teaching, technology, and gender in the classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 227–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D.L. and Feiman-Nemser, S. (1988). Using textbooks and teachers’ guides: A dilemma for beginning teachers and teacher educators. Curriculum Inquiry, 18, 401–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbieri, F. and Eckhardt, S.E.B. (2007). Applying corpus-based findings to form-focused instruction: The case of reported speech. Language Teaching Research, 11, 319–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, J. and Gower, R. (1998). Writing course materials for the world: A great compromise. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Materials development in language teaching (pp. 116–129). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36, 81–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosher, S. (2010). English for nursing: Developing discipline-specific materials. In N. Harwood (Ed.), English language teaching materials: Theory and practice (pp. 346–372). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosher, S. and Smalkoski, K. (2002). From needs analysis to curriculum development: Designing a course in health-care communication for immigrant students in the USA. English for Specil Purposes, 21, 59–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boxer, D. and Pickering, L. (1995). Problems in the presentation of speech acts in ELT materials: The case of complaints. ELT Journal, 49, 44–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, L. (1997). How does washback influence teaching? Implications for Hong Kong. Language and Education, 11, 38–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., and Monison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). London: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, R. and Kuo, I.-C. (2007). Spoken grammar and ELT course materials: A missing link? TESOL Quarterly, 41, 361–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freebairn, I. (2000). The coursebook — future continuous or past? English Teaching Professional, 15 (April), 3–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray J. (2000). The ELT course book as cultural artefact: How teachers censor and adapt. ELT Journal, 54, 274–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray J. (2010a). The branding of English and the culture of the new capitalism: Representations of the world of work in English language textbooks. Applied Linguistics, 31, 714–733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray J. (2010b). The construction of English: Culture, consumerism and promotion in the ELT globa I course book. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Grice, T and Greenan, J. (2007). Nursing 1 student’s book. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice, T. and Greenan, J. (2008). Nursing 2 student’s book. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley, M. and Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in practice. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harwood, N. (2005). What do we want EAP teaching materials for? Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4, 149–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harwood, N. (2010). Issues in materials development and design. In N. Harwood (Ed.), English language teaching materials: Theory and practice (pp. 3–30). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinchman, K. (1987). The textbook and three content-area teachers. Reading Research and Instruction, 26, 247–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hussin, V. (2002). An ESP program for students of nursing. In T. On (Ed.), English for specific purposes (pp. 25–39). Alexandria: TESOL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, E.G. (1996). What do teachers and learners actually do with textbooks? Teacher and learner use of a fisheries-based ELT textbook in the Philippines. Unpublished PhD thesis, Lancaster University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, T and Tones, E. (1994). The textbook as agent of change. ELT Journal, 48, 315–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyland, K. (2002). Specificity revisited: How far should we go now? English for Specific Purposes, 21, 385–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Islam, C. and Mares, C. (2003). Adapting classroom materials. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Developing materials for language teaching (pp. 86–100). London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, X. (2006). Suggestions: What should ESL students know? System, 34, 36–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R.N.E and Bathmaker, A.-M. (2007). The use of English textbooks for teaching English to ‘vocational’ students in Singapore secondary schools: A survey of teachers’ beliefs. RELC Journal, 38, 350–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levis, J.M. (1999). Intonation in theory and practice, revisited. TESOL Quarterly, 33, 37–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackey, A. and Gass, S. (2005). Second language research: Methodology and design. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCullagh, M. (2010). An initial evaluation of the effectiveness of a set of published materials for medical English. In B. Tomlinson and H. Masuhara (Eds.), Research for materials development in language teaching: Evidence for best practice (pp. 381–393). London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonough, J. and Shaw, C. (2003). Materials and methods in ELT: A teacher’s guide. London: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, I. (2002). Materials evaluation and design for language teaching. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, I. (2006). Teachers’ and learners’ images for course books. ELT Journal, 60, 171–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M.B. and Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, R. (1982). Why use textbooks? ELT Journal, 36, 104–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelly, C.P. and Allison, D. (2000). Investigating the views of teachers on assessment of English language learning in the Singapore education system. Hong Kong Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5, 81–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porreca, K.L. (1984). Sexism in current ESL textbooks. TESOL Quarterly, 18, 705–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, J.C. (1993). Beyond the textbook: The role of commercial materials in language teaching. RELC Journal, 24(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Römer, U. (2004). A corpus-driven approach to modal auxiliaries and their didactics. In j. Sinclair (Ed.), How to use corpora in language teaching (pp. 185–199). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Samuda, V. (2005). Expertise in pedagogic task design. In K. Johnson (Ed.), Expertise in second language learning and teaching (pp. 230–254). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, P. (1987). Commercial reading materials, a technological ideology, and the deskilling of teachers. The Elementary School Journal, 87, 307–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shardakova, M. and Pavlenko, A. (2004). Identity options in Russian textbooks. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 3, 25–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shawer, S. (2010a). Classroom-level cumculum development: EFL teachers as curriculum-developers, curriculum-makers and curriculum-transmitters. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 173–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shawer, S. (2010b). Classroom-level teacher professional development and satisfaction: Teachers learn in the context of classroom-level cumculum development. Professional Development in Education, 36, 597–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soars, L. and Soars, J. (2006a). New Headway plus elementary student’s book with interactive CD-ROM. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soars, L. and Soars, J. (2006b). New Headway plus pre-intermediate student’s book with interactive CD-ROM. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spack, R. (1988). Initiating ESL students into the academic discourse community: How far should we go? TESOL Quarterly, 22, 29–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stodolsky, S.S. (1989). Is teaching really by the book? In P.W. Jackson and S. Haroutunian-Gordon (Eds.), From Socrates to software: The teacher as text and the text as teacher (pp. 159–184). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, B. (2003). Materials development courses. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Developing materials for language teaching (pp. 445–461). London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsui, A.M. (2003). Understanding expertise in teaching: Case studies of second language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wall, D. and Alderson, J.C. (1993). Examining washback: The Sri Lankan impact study. Language Testing, 10, 41–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wette, R. (2010). Professional knowledge in action: How experienced ESOL teachers respond to feedback from learners within syllabus and contextual constraints. System, 38, 569–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M. (1988) Language taught for meetings and language used in meetings: Is there anything in common? Applied Linguistics, 9, 45–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, H. and Badger, R.G. (2009). In a strange and uncharted land: ESP teachers’ strategies for dealing with unpredicted problems in subject knowledge during class. English for Specil Purposes, 28, 19–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Ahlam Menkabu, Nigel Harwood

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Menkabu, A., Harwood, N. (2014). Teachers’ Conceptualization and Use of the Textbook on a Medical English Course. In: Harwood, N. (eds) English Language Teaching Textbooks. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137276285_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics