Skip to main content

Dimensions of Modern Freedom of Expression: WikiLeaks, Policy Hacking, and Digital Freedoms

  • Chapter
Beyond WikiLeaks

Abstract

The recent history of Internet development can easily be interpreted as a constant expansion of free communication and citizen journalism. From the open-publishing experiments by the global Indymedia network (http://www.indymedia.org), to their emergence as a mass phenomenon through blogging and commercial social networking platforms such as Facebook and Twitter, to the incorporation of user-generated content by established media (e.g., CNN’s iReporter), to Wikipedia and similar projects, participating in the production of media messages, information, and knowledge has changed the ways in which understandings and interpretations about the world are created. The “people formerly known as the audience” (Rosen, 2006), i.e., the new generation of netizens, have applied the now-classic Indymedia slogan: “Don’t hate the media, be the media!”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • AMARC (World Association of Community Broadcasters, 2010). “AMARC Deplores Suspension of New Communications Law in Argentina”. AMARC Link 13(1), January-March 2010. Retrieved from http://www.amarc.org/amar-clink/amarc_link_AVRIL_2010_EN_final.pd f

  • APC (Association for Progressive Communications, 2012). “The big snoop: The UK’s temptation to become a big brother and what it means for the rest of us”, April 20, 2012. Retrieved from http://www.apc.org/en/news/big-snoop-uk039s-temptation-become-big-brother-and

    Google Scholar 

  • Balkin, J. M. (2009). “The Future of Free Expression in a Digital Age”. Pepperdine Law Review 36(2), 427–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bambauer, D. E. (2009). “Cybersieves”. Duke Law Journal 59(3), 377–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, J. P. (2006). “A declaration of the independence of cyberspace”. Retrieved from http://homes.eff.org/-barlow/Declaration-Final.html

    Google Scholar 

  • BBC (2012). “The Pirate Bay must be blocked by UK ISPs, court rules”. April 30, 2012. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-17894176

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckett, C. (2012). “Wikileaks: Lessons for Media and Regulation”. LSE Media Policy Blog, March 5, 2012. Retrieved from http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/polis/2012/03/05/wikileaks-lessons-for-press-policy-regulation/

    Google Scholar 

  • Benkler, Y. (2011). “A Free Irresponsible Press: WikiLeaks and the Battle over the Soul of the Networked Fourth Estate”. Working draft. Retrieved from http://www.benkler.org/Benkler_Wikileaks_current.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Berners-Lee, T. (2012). “Analysis: ‘Cybersecurity’ bill endangers privacy rights”, ars technica, April 18, 2012. Retrieved from, http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2012/04/analysis-cybersecurity-bill-endangers-privacy-rights.ars

    Google Scholar 

  • Blevins, J. L., and Shade L. R. (2010). “International Perspectives on Network Neutrality: Exploring the Politics of Internet Traffic Management and Policy Implications for Canada and the U.S.”. Global Media Journal — Canadian Edition 3(1), 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollier, D. (2010). “A New Global Landmark for Free Speech”. June 16, 2010. Retrieved from http://www.bollier.org/new-global-landmark-free-speech

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, J. (2008). The Public Domain: Enclosing the Commons of the Mind. New Haven: Yale University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Braman, S. (2006). Change of State: Information, Policy, and Power. Cambridge: MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. (2011). “Discourses of Technology and Liberation: State Aid to Net Activists in an Era of ‘Twitter Revolutions’”. The Communication Review 14(3), 233–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, G. (2009). “Code is Speech: Legal Tinkering, Expertise, and Protest Among Free and Open Source Software Developers”. Cultural Anthropology 24(3), 420–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coyer, K. (2006). Community Radio Licensing and Policy: An Overview . Global Media and Communication 2(1), 129–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coyer, K., and Hintz, A. (2010). “Developing the ‘third sector’: Community media policies in Europe”. In Beata Klimkiewicz (ed.). Media Freedom and Pluralism: Media Policy Challenges in the Enlarged Europe. Budapest: CEU Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Deibert, R. J., Palfrey, J. G. , Rohozinski, R. and Zittrain, J. (2008). Access Denied: The Practice and Policy of Global Internet Filtering. Cambridge: MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Domscheit-Berg, D. (2011). Inside WikiLeaks: My Time with Julian Assange at the World’s Most Dangerous Website. London: Random House

    Google Scholar 

  • Downing, J. D. H. (2001). Radical Media: Rebellious Communication and Social Movements. London: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, L. (2010). “Liberation Technology”. Journal of Democracy 21(3), 69–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flaim, S. M. (2012). “Op-ed: Imminent ‘six strikes’ Copyright Alert System needs antitrust scrutiny”. ars technica, March 19, 2012. Retrieved from http://arstechnica.com/techpolicy/news/2012/03/op-ed-imminent-six-strikes-copy-right-alert-system-needs-antitrust-scrutiny.ars

    Google Scholar 

  • Galperin, E. (2012). “Kuwait Prepares to Crack Down on Social Media”. Deeplinks, May 2, 2012. Retrieved from https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/05/kuwait-prepares-crack-down-social-media

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, J., and Wu, T. (2006). Who Controls the Internet? Illusions of a Borderless World. Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Google (2011). Transparency Report 2011. Retrieved from http://www.google.com/transparencyreport/governmentrequests/US/?p=2011-06

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimsson, O. R. (2011). Keynote address to the conference of the European Consortium for Political Research (ECPR), Reykjavik, August 25, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallett, L., and Hintz, A. (2010). “Digital Broadcasting — Challenges and Opportunities for European Community Radio Broadcasters”. Telematics and Informatics 27(2), 151–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hintz, A. (2011). “From Media Niche to Policy Spotlight: Mapping Community Media Policy in Latin America”. Canadian Journal of Communication 36(1), 147–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintz, A., and Milan, S. (2009). “At the Margins of Internet Governance: Grassroots Tech Groups and Communication Policy”. International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics 5(1), 23–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IMMI (2012). IMMI Status Report. April 9, 2012. Retrieved from http://immi.is/images/8/8c/2012-04-15_IMMI_status_report.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, D. (2012). Empowering Independent Media: U.S. Efforts to Foster a Free Press and an Open Internet Around the World — Second Edition: 2012. Washington, D.C.: Center for International Media Assistance

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, I. (2012). “Web freedom races greatest threat ever, warns Google s Sergey Brin”. The Guardian. April 15, 2012. Retrieved from http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2012/apr/15/web-freedom-threat-google-brin

    Google Scholar 

  • Khamis, S., and Vaughn, K. (2011). “Cyberactivism in the Egyptian Revolution: How Civic Engagement and Citizen Journalism Tilted the Balance”. Arab Media & Society (13)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon, J. W. (1984). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policy. Boston: Little Brown

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiss, J. (2010). “Apple pulls Wikileaks app, but Android apps remain”. The Guardian: PDA — The Digital Content Blog, December 21, 2010. Retrieved from http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/pda/2010/dec/21/apple-wikileaks-app

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreimer, S. F. (2006). “Censorship by Proxy: The First Amendment, Internet Intermediaries, and the Problem of the Weakest Link”. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 155(11)

    Google Scholar 

  • LePelley, M. (2011). Das Jahrzehnt der Informationsfreiheit in Afrika? FES Perspektive, Dezember 2011, Friedrich Ebert Stiftung. Retrieved from http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/iez/08818-20120110.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Loreti, D. (2011). Research interview by Arne Hintz. Montreal, February 11, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendez, J. E. (2012). Report of the Special Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, Addendum: Observations on communications transmitted to Governments and replies received. Report to the United Nations General Assembly, February 29, 2012. A/HRC/19/61/Add.4

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, D. S. (2005). “Social Movements and Public Policy: Eggs, Chicken, and Theory”. In David S. Meyer, Valerie Jenness and Helen Ingram (eds). Routing the Opposition. Social Movements, Public Policy, and Democracy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Morozov, E. (2011). The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom. New York: Public Affairs

    Google Scholar 

  • Open Net Initiative (2012). “Global Internet Filtering in 2012 at a Glance”. Blog post, April 3, 2012. Retrieved from http://opennet.net/blog/2012/04/global-internet-filtering-2012-glance

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, K. (2012). “The Impending Cybersecurity Power Grab — It’s not just for the United States”. Deeplinks, April 18, 2012. Retrieved from https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/04/impending-cybersecurity-power-grab-its-not-j ust-united-states

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, J. (2006). “The People Formerly Known as the Audience”. Press Think. Retrieved from http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2006/06/27/ppl_frmr.html

    Google Scholar 

  • The Guardian (2011). “Facebook riot calls earn men four-year jail terms amid sentencing outcry”. August 16, 2011. Retrieved from http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/aug/16/facebook-riot-calls-men-jailed

    Google Scholar 

  • Villeneuve, N. (2012r). “Fake Skype Encryption Service Cloaks DarkComet Trojan”. TrendLabs Malware Blog, April 20, 2012. Retrieved from http://blog.trendmicro.com/fake-skype-encryption-software-cloaks-darkcomet-troj an/

    Google Scholar 

  • Waisbord, S. (2010). “The pragmatic politics of media reform: Media movements and coalition-building in Latin America”. Global Media and Communication 6(2), 133–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, S. C. (2011). “Vodaphone confirms role in Egypt’s cellular, Internet blackout”. The Raw Story, January 28, 2011. Retrieved from http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/01/28/vodafone-confirms-role-egypts-cellular-internet-blackout/

    Google Scholar 

  • York, J. (2011). “ZUll in Review: Internet Freedom in the Wake of the Arab Spring”. Deeplinks. December 31, 2011. Retrieved from https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/12/2011-review-internet-freedom-wake-arab-spring

    Google Scholar 

  • Zittrain, J. (2008). The Future of the Internet — And How to Stop It. New Haven: Yale University Press

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Arne Hintz

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hintz, A. (2013). Dimensions of Modern Freedom of Expression: WikiLeaks, Policy Hacking, and Digital Freedoms. In: Brevini, B., Hintz, A., McCurdy, P. (eds) Beyond WikiLeaks. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137275745_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics