Skip to main content
  • 179 Accesses

Abstract

Despite their differences, these extracts from women’s life writing of the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries share a common focus in their emphasis on personal relationships, communal identities, collective memories, and collaborations. Methodist Mary Tooth writes in a manuscript journal to preserve the letters of her friend Mary Fletcher alongside her own thoughts. Elizabeth Steele’s published narrative of the life of celebrated courtesan Sophia Baddeley is authorised by friendship and foregrounds biographical intimacy. Helen Maria Williams identifies her eye-witness accounts of the French Revolution as a contribution to the collective history of the age in a preface to a collection of her poems. My approach to theorising women’s life writing therefore begins with the writers’ own words. They frequently acknowledge the relational and communal aspects of self-representation, in contrast to the idea of autobiography s an individualistic practice, or an assertion of unique difference and solitary genius, most commonly associated in this period with the writing of Jean-Jacques Rousseau and William Wordsworth.4 The argument of this book is that approaching life writing as an expression of personal feeling by a single author has tended to obscure its importance as an articulation of relationships and communal identities or as a contribution to the history of a family, community, or nation.

I have also been occupied when I have had leisure for it in reading letters that was addressed to my dear Mrs Fletcher many of which relate to persons & things which are no longer of any moment to the living those I need not leave behind me, but some of them are of that import that I am desirous of retaining & will as time will admit enter in this journal.1

Mary Tooth, ‘Journal’ (1841)

In order to give the reader an opinion of the authenticity of these memoirs, it may not be unnecessary to inform him, that I was acquainted with Mrs. Baddeley from her earlier days; that as children we were brought up together, and educated at the same school; that our intimacy continued through the whole of her life, and that for several years of it, she lived in my house; that as her friend and confidante she unbosomed herself to me.2

Elizabeth Steele, The Memoirs of Mrs. Sophia Baddeley (1787)

I have there been treading on the territory of History, and a trace of my footsteps will perhaps be left. My narratives make a part of that marvellous story which the eighteenth century has to record to future times, and the testimony of a witness will be heard.3

Helen Maria Williams, Poems on Various Subjects (1823)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Martin A. Danahay, A Community of One: Masculine Autobiography and Autonomy in Nineteenth-Century Britain (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1993), 39–66.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Laura Marcus, Auto/biographical Discourses: Theory, Criticism, Practice (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1994), 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Philippe Lejeune, ‘The Autobiographical Contract’, in Tzvetan Todorov(ed.), French Literary Theory Today: A Reader (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982), 192–223 (193).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Felicity Nussbaum, The Autobiographical Subject: Gender and Ideology in Eighteenth-Century England (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1989), 4.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Prior to Nussbaum, only Patricia Meyer Spacks had explored eighteenthcentury women’s self-writing in any detail, addressing the work of Laetitia Pilkington, Charlotte Charke, Lady Mary Wortley Montagu, Hester Thrale, and Fanny Burney in Imagining a Self: Autobiography and Novel in Eighteenth-Century England (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  6. James Treadwell, Autobiographical Writing and British Literature 1783–1834 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 59, 8, 107.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rewarding studies include, Linda H. Peterson, Traditions of Victorian Women’s Autobiography: The Poetics and Politics of Life Writing (Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1999);

    Google Scholar 

  8. Valerie Sanders, The Private Lives of Victorian Women: Autobiography in Nineteenth-Century England (Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1989);

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mary Jean Corbett, Representing Femininity: Middle-Class Subjectivity in Victorian and Edwardian Women’s Autobiographies (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992);

    Google Scholar 

  10. Regenia Gagnier, Subjectivities: A History of Self-Representation in Britain, 1832–1920 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Janet Todd, Women’s Friendship in Literature (New York: Columbia University Press, 1980)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nina Auerbach, Communities of Women: An Idea in Fiction (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1978).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Betty Rizzo, Companions without Vows: Relationships among Eighteenth-Century British Women (Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rebecca D’Monté and Nicole Pohl (eds), ‘Introduction’, in Female Communities, 1600–1800: Literary Visions and Cultural Realities (New York: St Martin’s Press, 2000), 1–27 (2).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Elizabeth Eger, Bluestockings: Women of Reason from Enlightenment to Romanticism (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2010), 29.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Betty A. Schellenberg, The Professionalization of Women Writers in Eighteenth-Century Britain (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005), 14.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Julie A. Carlson, England’s First Family of Writers: Mary Wollstonecraft, William Godwin, Mary Shelley (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2007), 14.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Michelle Levy, Family Authorship and Romantic Print Culture (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2008), 2.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Bette London, Writing Double: Women’s Literary Partnerships (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1999), 19.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Stephen C. Behrendt, British Women Poets and the Romantic Writing Community (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2009), 13.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Max Saunders, Self-Impression: Life-Writing, Autobiografiction, and the Forms of Modern Literature (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 5–6.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. G. Thomas Couser, Memoir: An Introduction (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), 14, 170.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Margaret J. M. Ezell, Writing Women’s Literary History (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1993)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Margaret J. M. Ezell, Social Authorship and the Advent of Print (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  25. George L. Justice and Nathan Tinker (eds), Women’s Writing and the Circulation of Ideas: Manuscript Publication in England, 1550–1800 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Margaret J. M. Ezell, ‘Domestic Papers: Manuscript Culture and Early Modern Women’s Life Writing’, in Michelle M. Dowd and Julie A. Eckerle(eds), Genre and Women’s Life Writing in Early Modern England (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007), 33–48 (33).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Liz Stanley, The Auto/biographical I: the Theory and Practice of Feminist Auto/ biography (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1992), 93. Couser also suggests that the memoir’s roots are in daily discourses ‘in spontaneous, unique oral narratives; in anecdotes that are not only told but retold as signature stories; in personal stories that may be passed down’. Couser, Memoir, 26.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Paula McDowell, The Women of Grub Street: Press, Politics, and Gender in the London Literary Marketplace, 1678–1730 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998), 125.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  29. See Amy Culley and Rebecca Styler, ‘Special Issue: Lives in Relation’, Life Writing, 8.3 (2011), 237–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Paul John Eakin, How Our Lives Become Stories: Making Selves (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1999), 43.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mary G. Mason, ‘The Other Voice: Autobiographies of Women Writers’, in James Olney(ed.), Autobiography: Essays Theoretical and Critical (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1980), 207–35. For a summary of this critical tradition,

    Google Scholar 

  32. see Nancy K. Miller, ‘Representing Others: Gender and the Subjects of Autobiography’, Differences, 6.1 (1994), 1– (1–6).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Elizabeth Podnieks, “’Hit Sluts” and “Page Pimps”: Online Diarists and their Quest for Cyber-Union’, Life Writing, 1.2 (2007), 123–50 (125, 142).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2014 Amy Culley

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Culley, A. (2014). Introduction. In: British Women’s Life Writing, 1760–1840. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137274229_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics