Skip to main content

Uncertain Enthusiasm: PSA Screening, Proton Therapy and Prostate Cancer

  • Chapter
Cancer Patients, Cancer Pathways

Part of the book series: Science, Technology and Medicine in Modern History ((STMMH))

  • 198 Accesses

Abstract

The twentieth century decline in the incidence and prevalence of infectious disease has long been recognised by historians as coinciding with a renewed biomedical focus on the ‘disease management’ of the chronically ill.’ During the 1960s and 1970s the use of ‘risk factors’ — clinical indicators, genetic markers, lifestyle choices, and the like — began to increase the frequency and intensity of similar disease management interventions in seemingly healthy populations. During the past 40 years the global health care industry has engineered hugely profitable markets from healthy ‘patients’ largely by appealing to the value of preventative intervention in the battle against the new diseases of civilisation: hypertension, cancer, and diabetes.2 Ilana Löwy, Robert Aronowitz, and Charles Rosenberg have all recently documented some disturbing trends in disease management directed at the aggressive prevention of anticipated undesirable outcomes.3 New diagnostic tools and larger programmes of more biologically sensitive screening have lead to ever greater ‘early detection’ of ‘pre-cancerous’, ‘pre-diabetic’, and ‘pre-hypertensive’ patient populations. As Aronowitz points out, the experiences and patient-pathways of these ‘pre-patient’ patients can become almost indistinguishable from those patients with serious clinical symptoms of disease.4 While the consequences of this elision between statistical risk of disease and actual organic illness can be relatively benign, Aronowitz, Löwy and Rosenberg highlight at least one dire consequence of this trend: the rising number of healthy but ‘BRCA positive’ women undergoing extremely drastic measures such as prophylactic double mastectomies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Works Cited

  • Ablin R. 2010, ‘The Great Prostate Mistake’, New York Times, 9 March, A27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Advanced Particle Therapy 2011, ‘Partnering for the Future of Cancer Treatment’ <http://www.advancedparticletherapy.com/> (last accessed 21 February 2011).

  • Andriole G. L., Grubb R. L., Buys S. S., Chia D., Church T. R., Fouad M. N., Gelmann E. P., Kvale P. A., Reding D. J., Weissfeld J. L., Yokochi L. A., Craw-ford E. D., O’Brien B., Clapp J. D., Rathmell J. M., Riley T. L., Hayes R. B., Kramer B. S., Izmirlian G., Miller A. B., Pinsky P. F., Prorok P. C., Gohagan J. K. and Berg C. D. 2009, ‘Mortality Results from a Randomized Prostate-Cancer Screening Trial’, New England Journal of Medicine, 360, 1310–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aronowitz R. 2007, Unnatural Histoiy: Breast Cancer and American Society, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronowitz R. 2009, ‘The Converged Experience of Risk and Disease’, Milbank Quarterly, 87, 417–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barclay L. 2004, ‘End of an Era for PSA Screening: A Newsmaker Interview With Thomas Stamey, MD’, Medscape Medical News: http://www.medscape.com/view-article/489474 (last accessed 20 February 2011).

  • Bryder L. 2008, ‘Debates about Cervical Screening: An Historical Overview’, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 62, 284–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casper M. and Clarke A. 1998, ‘Making the Pap Smear into the “Right Tool” for the Job: Cervical Cancer Screening in the USA, circa 1940–95’, Social Studies of Science, 28, 255–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke A. E., Mamo L., Fishman J. R., Shim J. K. and Fosket J. R. 2003, ‘Bio-medicalization: Technoscientific Transformations of Health, Illness and US Biomedicine’, American Sociological Review, 68, 161–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl O. 2005, ‘Protons. A Step Forward or Perhaps Only More Expensive Radiation Therapy?’, Acta Oncologica, 44, 798–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans I., Thornton H. and Chalmers I. 2006, Testing Treatments: Better Research for Better Healthcare, London: British Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman T. 2004, ‘The Vulnerability of Radiation Oncology within the Medical Industrial Complex’, International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, 59, 1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goitein M. and Cox J. 2008, ‘Should Randomized Clinical Trials Be Required for Proton Radiotherapy?’, Journal of Clinical Oncology, 26, 175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goitein M. and Goitein G. 2005, ‘Swedish Protons’, Acta Oncologica, 44, 793–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene J. 2007, Prescribing by Numbers: Drugs and the Definition of Disease, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall E. 2009, ‘Protons for Radiotherapy: A 1946 Proposal’, Lancet Oncology, 10, 196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halperin E. 2006, ‘Particle Therapy and Treatment of Cancer’, Lancet Oncology, 7, 676–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill C. and Laplanche A. 2010, ‘Cancer de la Prostate: Les Données Sont en Défaveur du Dépistage’, La Presse Médicale, 39, 859–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones B. 2005, ‘Particle Therapy Co-operative Oncology Group (PTCOG 40) Meeting, Institute Curie 2004’, British Journal of Radiology, 78, 99–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones B. 2006, ‘The Case for Particle Therapy’, British Journal of Radiology, 79, 24–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones B. and Burnet N. 2005, ‘Radiotherapy for the Future’, British Medical Journal, 330, 979–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones B. and Rosenberg I. 2005, ‘Particle Therapy Cooperative Oncology Group (PTCOG40)’, British Journal of Radiology, 78, 99–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan V. 2009, ‘A Century of Deciphering the Control Mechanisms of Sex Steroid Action in Breast and Prostate Cancer: The Origins of Targeted Therapy and Chemoprevention’, Cancer Research, 69, 1243–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kangan A. and Schultz R. 2010, ‘Proton-Beam Therapy for Prostate Cancer’, Cancer Journal, 16, 405–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keating P. and Cambrosio A. 2002, ‘From Screening to Clinical Research: The Cure of Leukemia and the Early Development of the Cooperative Oncology Groups, 1955–1966’, Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 76, 299–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence E. 1937, ‘The Biological Action of Neutron Rays’, Radiology, 29, 313–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonhardt D. 2009, ‘In Health Reform, a Cancer Offers an Acid Test’, New York Times, 7 July, Al.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner B. 2001, The Breast Cancer Wars: Hope, Fear, and the Pursuit of a Cure in Twentieth-Century America, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis T. 1977, ‘On the Science and Technology of Medicine’, Daedalus, 106, 35–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lexchin J. 2011, ‘Those Who Have the Gold Make the Evidence: How the Pharmaceutical Industry Biases Outcomes of Clinical Trials of Medications’, Science and Engineering Ethics, 17, Epub ahead of print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löwy I. 1996, Between Bench and Bedside: Science, Healing, and Interleukin-2 in a Cancer Ward, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löwy I. 2009, Preventative Strikes: Women, Precancer, and Prophylactic Surgery, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löwy I. 2012, A Woman’s Disease: The History of Cervical Cancer, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makarov D. and Carter H. 2006, ‘The Discovery of Prostate Specific Antigen as a Biomarker for the Early Detection of Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate’, Journal of Urology, 176, 2383–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marks H. 1997, The Progress of Experiment: Science and Therapeutic Reform in the United States, 1900–1990, New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metz J. 2006, ‘History of Proton Therapy’, August 2006, Oncolink.org: http://www.oncolink.org/custom_tags/print_article.cfui?Page=2&id=209&Section=Treatment_ Options (last accessed 7 August 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nass S., Moses H. and Mendelsohn J. (eds) 2010, A National Cancer Clinical Trials System for the 21st Century: Reinvigorating the NCI Cooperative Group Program, Washington: National Academy of Sciences: http://www.nap.edu/catalog/12879. html (last accessed 20 February 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • The National Association for Proton Therapy 2011, ‘US Proton Therapy Centers’, http://www.proton-therapy.org/map.htm (last accessed 20 February 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • National Cancer Institute 2011, ‘Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results. Stat Fact Sheet: Prostate’, http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/prost.html (last accessed 8 August 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • National Prostate Cancer Coalition 2007, ‘Do it for Dad’, http://zerocancer.org/assets/2007_DIFD_Press_Kit.pdf?docID=661 (last accessed 6 July 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen D. R., Bruland O. S., Frykholm G. and Norderhaug I. N. 2007, ‘Proton Therapy — A Systematic Review of Clinical Effectiveness’, Radiotherapy and Oncology, 83, 123–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Particle Therapy Cooperative Group 2011, ‘Particle Therapy Facilities on Operation (International)’, http://ptcog.web.psi.ch/ptcentres.html (last accessed 21 February 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • Particles, June 1988—January 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips J. and Sinha A. 2009, ‘Patterns, Art, and Context: Donald Floyd Gleason and the Development of the Gleason Grading System’, Urology, 74, 497–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potosky A. L., Miller B. A., Albertsen P. C. and Kramer B. S. 1995, ‘The Role of Increasing Detection in the Rising Incidence of Prostate Cancer’, Journal of the American Medical Association, 273, 548–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potts J. and Walker E. 2010, ‘Isn’t It Time to Abandon Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) for Prostate Cancer Screening?’, Journal of Men’s Health, 7, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao A. R., Motiwala H. G. and Karim O. M. A. 2007, ‘The Discovery of Prostate-Specific Antigen’, BJU lnternational, 101, 5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg C. 2009, ‘Managed Fear’, The Lancet, 373, 802–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakr W. A., Grignon D. J., Haas G. P., Heilbrun L. K., Pontes J. E. and Crisman J. D. 1996, ‘Age and Racial Distribution of Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia’, European Urology, 30, 138–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schröder F. H., Hugosson J., Roobol M. J., Tammela T. L. J., Ciatto S., Nelen V., Kwiatkowski M., Lujan M., Lilja H., Zappa M., Denis L. J., Recker F., Berenguer A., Määttänen L., Bangma C. H., Aus G., Villers A., Rebillard X., van der Kwast T., Blijenberg B. G., Moss S. M., de Koning H. J. and Auvinen A. 2009, ‘Screening and Prostate-Cancer Mortality in a Randomized European Study’, The New England Journal of Medicine, 390, 1320–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silletti J. P., Gordon G. J., Bueno R., Jaklitsch M. and Loughlin K. R. 2007, ‘Prostate Biopsy: Past, Present, and Future’, Urology, 69, 413–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater J. 2006, ‘Clinical Applications of Proton Radiation Treatment at Loma Linda University: Review of a Fifteen Year Experience’, Technology in Cancer Research and Treatment, 5, 81–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith A. 2006, ‘Proton Therapy’, Physics in Medicine and Biology, 51, R491—R504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith A. 2009, ‘Vision 20/20: Proton Therapy’, Medical Physics, 36, 556–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sriprasad S., Feneley M. and Thompson P. 2009, ‘History of Prostate Cancer Treatment’, Surgical Oncology, 18, 185–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stamey T. A., Caldwell M., McNeal J. E., Nolley R., Hemenez M. and Downs J. 2004, ‘The Prostate Spedfic Antigen Era in the United States is Over for Prostate Cancer: What Happened in the Last Twenty Years?’, Journal of Urology, 172, 1297–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stamey T. A., Kabilin J. N., McNeal J. E., Johnstone I. M., Freiha F., Redwine E. A. and Yang N. 1989, ‘Prostate Specific Antigen in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate. II. Radical Prostatectomy Treated Patients’, Journal of Urology, 141, 1076–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamey T. A., Yang N., Hay A. R., McNeal J. E., Freiha F. and Redwine E. A. 1987, ’Prostate-Specific Antigen as a Serum Marker for Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate’, New England Journal of Medicine, 317, 909–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanton J. 2000, ‘Supported Lives’, in R. Cooter and J. Pickstone (eds) Medicine in the Twentieth Centuty, Amsterdam: Harwood Academic, 601–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone R. and Larkin J. 1952, ‘The Treatment of Cancer with Fast Neutrons’, Radiology, 39, 608–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suit H. 2002, ‘Coming Technical Advances in Radiation Oncology’, International Journal of Oncology Biology and Physics, 53, 798–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timmermans S. and Berg M. 2003, The Gold Standard: The Challenge of Evidence-Based Medicine and Standardization in Health Care, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobias C. A., Lawrence J. A., Born J. L., McCombs R. K., Roberts J. E., Anger H. O., Low-Beer B. V. A. and Huggins C. B. 1956, ‘Pituitary Irradiation with High-Energy Proton Beams: A Preliminary Report’, Cancer Research, 18, 121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turesson I., Johansson K.-A. and Mattsson M. 2003, ‘The Potential of Proton and Light Ion Beams in Radiotherapy’, Acta Oncologica, 42, 107–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vos R. 1991, Drugs Looking for Diseases: Innovative Drug Research and the Development of the Beta Blockers and the Calcium Antagonists, Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson R. 2004, A Brie f History of the Harvard University Cyclotrons, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamey G. and Wilkes M. 2002, ‘The PSA Storm. Questioning Cancer Screening Can Be a Risky Business in America’, British Medical Journal, 324, 431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2012 Helen Valier

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Valier, H. (2012). Uncertain Enthusiasm: PSA Screening, Proton Therapy and Prostate Cancer. In: Timmermann, C., Toon, E. (eds) Cancer Patients, Cancer Pathways. Science, Technology and Medicine in Modern History. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137272089_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137272089_9

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-44480-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-27208-9

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics