Abstract
So, now, how are the varieties of tone to be sorted out? How are the similarities and the differences among these many examples to be described and grouped? In connection with the main themes of Part Two, the pair ‘bet’ and ‘wager’ provides an interesting example. It is doubtful whether these two words differ, either in meaning or in use, in any of the ways discussed earlier. For the latter, The Concise Oxford Dictionary gives only the identity statement, “wager = bet”. In The Shorter Oxford which, as we saw, includes among its style register the category ‘Formal’, no mention is made of any special or restricted use for either word. So, are these two words perfectly synonymous? Are they everywhere interchangeable salva significatione? There is one colloquial or slang use that evidently does not permit substitution: the reply “You bet!”, meaning ‘You may be sure’. The implicit certainty of outcome suggests that it may be a shortened form of ‘You can bet (on it)’. Another possibility is that it derives from the certainty of betting against oneself, as in ‘You bet you’. Hence, perhaps, the slangy ‘You betcha’ (sometimes ‘You bet ya’). Or maybe this expression is ultimately best viewed as idiomatic — a one-of-a-kind term that requires piecemeal learning. In which case it does not undermine the suggested synonymy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Richard D. Kortum
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kortum, R.D. (2013). A Taxonomy of Tone. In: Varieties of Tone. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137263544_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137263544_24
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-44259-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-26354-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)