Skip to main content

Undergraduate Understandings: Stance and Voice in Final Year Reports

  • Chapter

Abstract

The ability to evaluate one’s material and establish a connection with readers is now acknowledged to be a key feature of successful academic writing (Hyland, 2004; Swales, 2004). As other authors in this collection have noted, academic argument involves presenting a position on things that matter to a discipline and this expression of a point of view has to be accomplished in a context of certain community and genre conventions. These conventions simultaneously place constraints on individual expression and offer opportunities to carve out a personal position, and this is the domain of stance and voice (Atkinson, 2001; Biber, 2006). Both these terms address interpersonal aspects of language, concerned with how writers and speakers represent themselves and their ideas to particular interlocutors. Despite their importance, they are extremely complex concepts, variously defined and not always fully grasped by student writers, especially by those working in a foreign language. Following other analysts, I understand stance to refer to a writer’s rhetorically expressed attitude to the propositions in a text and voice as his or her attitude to a given community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Atkinson, D. (2001) ‘Reflections and refractions in the JSLW special issue on voice’, Journal of Second Language Writing 10, 107–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biber, D. (2006) University language (Amsterdam: John Benjamins).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blommaert, J. (2005) Discourse (Cambridge: CUP).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hunston, S. and G. Thompson (eds) (2000) Evaluation in text (Oxford: OUP).

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. A. K. (1989) ‘Context of situation’ in Halliday, M. and R. Hasan (eds) Language, context, and text: aspects of language in a socialsemiotic perspective (Oxford: OUP), pp. 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyland, K. (1998) Hedging in scientific research articles (Amsterdam: John Benjamins).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hyland, K. (2002a) ‘Directives: power and engagement in academic writing’, Applied Linguistics, 23 (2), 215–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyland, K. (2002b) ‘What do they mean? Questions in academic writing’, TEXT, 22 (4), 529–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyland, K. (2004) Disciplinary discourses (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyland, K. (2005) ‘Stance and engagement: a model of interaction in academic discourse’, Discourse Studies, 7 (2), 173–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyland, K. (2012) Disciplinary identities (Cambridge: CUP).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyland, K. and J. Milton (1997) ‘Qualification and certainty in Ll and L2 students’ writing’, Journal of Second Language Writing, 16 (2), 183–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanič, R. (1998) Writing and identity: the discoursal construction of identity in academic writing (Amsterdam: John Benjamins).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lillis, T. (2001) Student writing: access, regulation, desire (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. and P. R. R. White (2005) The language of evaluation: appraisal in English (London: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scollon, R. and S. Scollon (2001) Intercultural communication, 2nd edn (Oxford: Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Swales, J. (2004) Research genres (Cambridge: CUP).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, G. (2001) ‘Interaction in academic writing: learning to argue with the reader’, Applied Linguistics, 22 (1), 58–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2012 Ken Hyland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hyland, K. (2012). Undergraduate Understandings: Stance and Voice in Final Year Reports. In: Hyland, K., Guinda, C.S. (eds) Stance and Voice in Written Academic Genres. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137030825_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics