Abstract
During over 20 years of doi moi 1 Vietnam achieved major results in terms of economic growth, institutional development, and poverty reduction. This chapter argues that these results depended on a pragmatic and gradualist reform process that scarcely conformed to the prescription of the Washington Consensus. A deeper integration in the regional productive system during the 2000s contributed to industrial development and resulted in wider income polarisation and labour-capital conflicts. However, the new economic and social dynamics are too recent to draw conclusions about a possible convergence with neoliberal practices.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Amsden, Alice H. 1989. Asia’s Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialisation . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Amsden, Alice H. 1994 “Why Isn’t the Whole World Experimenting with the East Asian Model of Development? Review of the East Asian Miracle”. World Development 22 (4): 627–33.
Beresford, Melanie. 2008. “ Doi Moi in Review: The Challenges of Building Market Socialism in Vietnam”. Journal of Contemporary Asia 38 (2): 221–43.
Beresford, Melanie, and Tran Ngoc Angie, eds. 2004. Reaching for the Dream . Copenhagen: NIAS Press.
Berger, Mark T., and Mark Beeson. 1998. “Lineages of Liberalism and Miracles of Modernisation: The World Bank, the East Asian Trajectory and the International Development Debate”. Third World Quarterly 19 (3): 487–504.
Chang, Ha-Joon. 1996. The Political Economy of Industrial Policy . London: Palgrave.
Chang, Ha-Joon. 2003. Globalization, Economic Development and the Role of the State . London and New York: Zed Books
Chang, Ha-Joon. 2006a. The East Asian Development Experience: The Miracle, the Crisis and the Future . Penang: Third World Network.
Chang, Ha-Joon. 2006b. “Industrial Policy in East Asia – Lessons for Europe”. EIB Papers 11 (2): 106–32.
Cumings, Bruce. 1987. “The Origin and Development of the Northeast Asian Political Economy: Industrial Sectors, Product Cycles, and Political Consequences”. In F. C. Deyo, ed., The Political Economy of the New Asian Industrialism , 43–83. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Dapice, David. 2008. “Choosing Success: The Lessons of East and Southeast Asia and Vietnam’s Future”. Paper presented at the Harvard Vietnam Program, Harvard University.
Evans, Peter B. 1995. Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Fforde, Adam. 2002. “Light within the ASEAN Gloom? Vietnam’s Economy since the Asian Financial Crisis”. In Daljit Singh and Anthony L. Smith, eds, Southeast Asian Affairs 2002 , 357–77. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Fforde, Adam. 2004. “Vietnamese State-Owned Enterprises: ‘Real Property’, Commercial Performance and Political Economy”. SEARC Working Paper Series no. 69 (August), City University of Hong Kong.
Fforde, Adam. 2007. Vietnamese State Industry and the Political Economy of Commercial Renaissance: Dragon’s Tooth or Curate’s Egg? . Oxford: Chandos.
Fforde, Adam. 2008. “Economic Transformation: Some Implications of Vietnam’s Economic Growth Pattern – or Reflections on the Economics of Vietnamese Capitalism and Possible Political Implications”. Paper presented at the Conference on “Remaking the Vietnamese State: Implications for Viet Nam & Beyond”, August, City University of Hong Kong.
Fforde, Adam, and Stefan de Vylder. 1996. From Plan to Market: The Economic Transition in Vietnam . Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Fine, Ben. 2001. “Neither the Washington nor the Post-Washington Consensus: An Introduction”. In Ben Fine, C. Lapavitsas, and J. Pincus, eds, Development Policy in the Twenty-first Century: Beyond the Post-Washington Consensus , 1–27. London and New York: Routledge.
Fine, Ben. 2006. “The Developmental State and the Political Economy of Development”. In Ben Fine and K. S. Jomo, eds, The New Development Economics: After the Washington Consensus , 101–22. New Delhi: Tulika Books.
Gabriele, Alberto. 2006. “Social Services Policies in a Developing Market Economy Oriented towards Socialism: The Case of Health System Reforms in Vietnam”. Review of International Political Economy 13 (2): 258–89.
Gainsborough, Martin. 2002. “Political Change in Vietnam: In Search of the Middle-Class Challenge to the State” Asian Survey 42 (5): 694–707.
Gainsborough, Martin. 2008. “Privatisation as State Advance: Private Indirect Government in Vietnam”. Centre for Governance and International Affairs, University of Bristol, Working Paper no. 12–08.
General Statistical Office of Vietnam (GSO). 2008. Foreign Direct Investment in Vietnam – Seven Years at the Beginning of Century 21st . Hanoi: Statistical Publishing House.
Hart-Landsberg, Martin, and Paul Burkett. 1998. “Contradictions of Capitalist Industrialization in East Asia: A Critique of ‘Flying Geese’ Theories of Development”. Economic Geography 74 (2): 87–110.
Harvey, David. 2005. A Brief History of Neoliberalism . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Loc, Truong Dong. 2006. “Equitisation and Stock-Market Development: The Case of Vietnam”. PhD dissertation, Faculty of Economics, University of Groningen.
London, Jonathan. 2004. “Rethinking Vietnam’s Mass Education and Health Systems”. In Duncan McCargo, ed., Rethinking Vietnam , 127–42. London: Routledge Curzon.
Masina, Pietro P., ed. 2002a. Rethinking Development in East Asia: From Illusory Miracle to Economic Crisis . Richmond, VA: Curzon Press
Masina, Pietro P. 2002b. “Vietnam and the Regional Crisis: The Case of a ‘Late Late- Comer’”. European Journal of East Asian Studies 1 (2): 199–220.
Masina, Pietro P. 2006 Vietnam’s Development Strategies . London and New York: Routledge.
Masina, Pietro P. 2009. “Vietnam and the Experience of the Asian Crisis”. In C. P. Chandrasekhar and Jayati Ghosh, eds, A Decade After: Recovery and Adjustment after the Asian Crisis , 292–307. New Delhi: Tulika Books.
Ministry of Planning and Investment (MPI). 2009. Results-Based Mid-Term Review Report: For the Implementation of the Five-Year Socio-economic Development Plan 2006–2010 . Hanoi: MPI.
Ohno, Kenichi. 2009. “Avoiding the Middle-Income Trap: Renovating Industrial Policy Formulation in Vietnam”. ASEAN Economic Bulletin 26 (1): 25–43.
Painter, Martin. 2003a. “The Politics of Economic Restructuring in Vietnam: The Case of State-Owned Enterprise ‘Reform’”. Contemporary Southeast Asia 25 (1): 20–43.
Painter, Martin. 2003b. “Marketisation, Integration and State Restructuring in Viet Nam: The Case of State-Owned Enterprise Reform”. SEARC Working Paper Series, no. 39 (January), City University of Hong Kong.
Painter, Martin. 2005. “The Politics of State Sector Reform in Vietnam: Contested Agendas and Uncertain Trajectories”. Journal of Development Studies 41 (2): 261–83.
Perkins, Dwight H. 2001 “Industrial and Financial Policy in China and Vietnam: A New Model or a Replay of the East Asian Experience?”. In Joseph E. Stiglitz and Shahid Yusuf, eds, Rethinking the East Asian Miracle , 247–94. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Perkins, Dwight H., and Vu Thanh Anh. 2007. “Vietnam’s Industrial Policy: Designing Policies for Sustainable Development”. Policy Dialogue Paper no.1, Ash Institute for Democratic Governance and Innovation, Kennedy School, Harvard University.
Saad-Filho, Alfredo, and Deborah Johnston, eds. 2005. Neoliberalism: A Critical Reader . London and Ann Arbor: Pluto Press.
United Nations Development Plan (UNDP). 2006. “The State as Investor: Equitisation, Privatisation and the Transformation of SOEs in Viet Nam”. UNDP Vietnam Policy Dialogue Paper, 2006/3. Hanoi: UNDP.
United Nations Development Plan (UNDP). 2007. Top 200: Industrial Strategies of Viet Nam’s Largest Firms . Hanoi: UNDP.
Van Arkadie, Brian, and Raymond Mallon. 2003. Viet Nam: A Transition Tiger? Canberra: Asia Pacific Press.
Wade, Robert. 1990. Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Wade, Robert. 1996. “Japan, The World Bank, and the Art of Paradigm Maintenance: The East Asian Miracle in Political Perspective”. New Left Review 217: 3–36.
Weiss, Linda. 1995. “Governed Interdependence: Rethinking the Government- Business Relationship in East Asia.” Pacific Review 8 (4): 589–616.
Weiss, Linda. 2000. “Developmental State in Transition: Adapting, Dismantling, Innovating, Not ‘Normalising’”. Pacific Review 13 (1): 21–55.
White, Gordon, and Robert Wade. 1988. “Developmental States and Markets in East Asia: An Introduction”. In Gordon White, ed., The Developmental State , 1–29. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Woo-Cumings, Meredith, ed. 1999. The Developmental State . Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
World Bank. 1993. The East Asian Miracle: Economic Growth and Public Policy . A World Bank Policy Research Report. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2012 Pietro Masina
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Masina, P. (2012). Vietnam between Developmental State and Neoliberalism: The Case of the Industrial Sector. In: Kyung-Sup, C., Fine, B., Weiss, L. (eds) Developmental Politics in Transition. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137028303_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137028303_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-33332-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-02830-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)