Abstract
Muhammad Hasan Askari was Urdu’s first literary critic in the Western, practical sense of the term: that is, he chose to set up as a critic, an interpreter, and a judge of literature. He regarded the business of criticism as an important activity in itself, an activity that required special qualifications in both academic and intellectual terms. Although he occasionally translated and wrote short fiction, Askari’s primary endeavors concerned literary criticism. As a literary critic, he was passionately interested in the political and cultural issues of the day, and especially in literature as an expression or function of culture. He wrote dazzling essays on various aspects of literature. Askari speaks from the center of a crisis of culture—both as a leader of Urdu intellectual discourse and as a subject of the rupture inflicted on Indo-Muslim literary-cultural history. The milieu of this cultural crisis was the progression of events leading to independence, Partition, and the creation of India and Pakistan in 1947, which, in turn, precipitated in Askari an emotive effort to chart the parameters of Indo-Muslim identity within a “new” Pakistani culture. It was an exceptional prefiguration of a postcolonial critic—writing back not only to the empire, but also to the nation—decades before the academy recognized such voices and the cultural-literary phenomenon they embodied.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See Ella Shohat, “Notes on the ‘Post-Colonial,’” Social Text 31/32 (1992), 103;
and Arif Dirlik, “The Postcolonial Aura: Third World Criticism in the Age of Global Capitalism,” Critical Inquiry 20/2 (1994), 328–56.
See Dipesh Chakrabarty, Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference (Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2001).
Beginning with Carlo Coppola’s PhD dissertation, Urdu Poetry—The Progressive Episode 1935–1970, University of Chicago, 1975, we are fortunate to have some excellent studies of the Progressive Writers’ Movement. See, for example, Khizar Humayun Ansari’s, The Emergence of Socialist Thought Among North Indian Muslims (1917–1947) (Lahore: Shirkat Printing Press, 1990).
See Stephen O. Murray’s empathetic and convincing essay, “The Will Not to Know: Islamic Accommodations of Male Homosexuality,” in Islamic Homosexualities, Culture, History and Literature, ed. Stephen Murray and Will Roscoe (New York: New York University Press, 1997), 14–54. Apparently tales of Askari and Firaq’s “relationship” were common in Allahabad in those days, though almost impossible to find recorded. I found some oblique references, the closest being Syed Muhammad Aqil’s innuendo in Ga’u Dhul (Allahabad: Anjuman Tahzib-e Nau, 1995), 401. I discuss this in greater detail in chapter 2.
Interested readers should look at Dennis Altman’s thought-provoking essay, “Rupture or Continuity? The Internationalization of Gay Identities,” in Postcolonial, Queer Theoretical Intersections, ed. John C. Hawley (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2001), 19–42.
Copyright information
© 2012 Mehr Afshan Farooqi
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Farooqi, M.A. (2012). Introduction. In: Urdu Literary Culture. Literatures and Cultures of the Islamic World. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137026927_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137026927_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-43593-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-02692-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)