Abstract
This short penultimate chapter highlights how various factors relating to the organisation of policymaking institutions, including the short time frames within which policymakers are commonly required to work, combined with an often rapid level of staff turnover, contribute to an extremely limited institutional memory. This can lead to similar ideas being recycled as they are re-presented (or as they re-emerge) as new ideas. It also suggests that researchers, for a variety of reasons (including the pressure to obtain research funding), do not always seek to draw policymakers’ attention to the recycling of similar ideas. Perhaps more positively (for those keen to ensure public health research does inform policy), the chapter notes that this means research-informed ideas are likely to have multiple opportunities to influence policy.
I think the worst failure in life (and in knowledge brokering) is the repetition of an established mistake. That is to say, the worst failure is the failure to learn.
(Beynon 2012)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Katherine Smith
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Smith, K. (2013). Institutional Amnesia and the Rise of Public Health Knowledge Brokers. In: Beyond Evidence-Based Policy in Public Health. Palgrave Studies in Science, Knowledge and Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137026583_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137026583_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-43926-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-02658-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)