Skip to main content

Abstract

This chapter examines technical change in European banking by applying the Fourier Flexible functional form and stochastic cost frontier methodologies using 13 603 bank observations across 15 EU countries between 1988 and 1995. The results show that technical progress has had a similar influence across European banking markets, making a positive contribution to costs of around 3 per cent every year. Large banks appear to benefit more from technical change than their smaller competitors. We also break down technical progress into its three main cornponents: pure, scale and (input) non-neutral effects. This shows that pure technical change is the main contributor to overall technical progress for small banks (assets size less than $1 billion) and larger banks appear to gain more from technical advances which alter the optimal input mix. Technical change also becomes increasingly scale biased as banks become larger. This implies that technological change increases the minimum efficient bank size for larger banks to a greater extent than for their smaller competitors. Given that technical change is nonneutral with respect to optimal bank size and input-mix, we tentatively suggest that the formation of larger banks may be in the public interest.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aigner, D., C. Lovell and P. Schmidt (1977), ‘Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production models’, Journal of Econometrics, 6, pp. 21–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, L. and A. Rai (1996), ‘Operational efficiency in banking: an international comparison’, Journal of Banking and Finance, 20(4), pp. 655–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altunba, Y. and P. Molyneux (1994), Sensitivity of Stochastic Frontier Estimation to Distributional Assumptions: the Case of the German Banks, Institute of European Finance Paper (preliminary version, unpublished in 1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, A. (1993), European Banking and Capital Markets: a Strategic Forecast, Research Report, London: The Economist Intelligence Unit

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi, B.H. (1995), Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, Chichester, UK: John Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi, B.H. and J.M. Griffin (1988), ‘A general index of technical change’, Journal ofPolitical Economy, 96(1), pp. 20–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battese, G.E. and G.S. Corra (1977), ‘Estimation of a production frontier model: with application to the pastoral zone of Eastern Australia’, Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 21(3), pp. 169–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, P. (1990), ‘Recent developments in the econometric estimations of frontiers’, Journal of Econometrics, 46, pp. 39–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A.N. and D.B. Humphrey (1997), ‘Efficiency of financial institutions: international survey and directions for future research’, European Journal of Operational Research, 98, pp. 175–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A.N., J.H. Leusner and J.J. Mingo (1994), The Efficiency of Bank Branches, Working Paper, Wharton Financial Institutions Centre, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Cebenoyan, A.S., E.S. Cooperman, C.A. Register and S.C. Hudgins (1993), ‘The relative efficiency of stock versus mutual S&Ls: a stochastic cost frontier approach’, Journal ofFinancial Services Research, 7, pp. 151–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Cecchini, P. (1988), The European Challenge in 1992: the Benefits of a Single Market, Aldershot: Gower

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalfant, J.A. and A.R. Gallant (1985), ‘Estimating substitution elasticities with the Fourier cost function’, Journal ofEconometrics, 28, pp. 205–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornwell, C., P. Schmidt and R.C. Sickles (1990), ‘Production frontiers with cross-sectional and time-series variation in efficiency levels’, Journal of Econometrics, 46, pp. 185–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eastwood, B.J. and A.R. Gallant (1991), ‘Adaptive rules for seminonparametric estimators that achieve asymptotic normality’, Economic Theory, 7, pp. 307–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elbadawi, I., A.R. Gallant and G. Souza (1983), ‘An elasticity can be estimated consistently without a priori knowledge of functional form’, Econometrica, 51, pp. 1731–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrier, G.D. and C.A.K. Lovell (1990), ‘Measuring cost efficiency in banking: econometric and linear programming evidence’ Journal of Econometrics, 46, pp. 229–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallant, A.R. (1981), ‘On the bias in Flexible Functional forms and essentially unbiased form: the Fourier Flexible form’, Journal of Econometrics, 15, pp. 211–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallant, A.R. (1982), ‘Unbiased determination of production technologies’, Journal of Econometrics, 20, pp. 285–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallant, A.R. and G. Souza (1991), ‘On the asymptotic normality of Fourier Flexible form estimates’, Journal of Econometrics, 50, pp. 329–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W.M. (1990), ‘A gamma-distributed stochastic frontier model’, Journal of Econometrics, 46, pp. 141–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W.M. (1993), ‘The econometric approach to efficiency analysis’, in H.O. Fried, C.A. Lovell and P. Schmidt (eds), The Measurement of Productive Efficiency: Techniques and Applications, Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, D.B. (1993), ‘Cost and technical change: effects from bank deregulation’, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 4, pp. 9–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, W.C. and S.G. Timme (1991), ‘Technological change in large US commercial banks’, Journal of Business, 64, pp. 339–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jagtiani, J. and A. Khanthavit (1996), ‘Scale and scope economies at large banks: including off-balance sheet products and regulatory effects (1984–1991)’, Journal of Banking and Finance, 20 (7), pp. 1271–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jondrow, J., C.A. Lovell, I.S. Materov and P. Schmidt (1982), ‘On estimation of technical inefficiency in the stochastic frontier production function model’, Journal of Econometrics, 19, pp. 233–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaparakis, E.I., S.M. Miller and A.G. Noulas (1994), ‘Short-run cost inefficiencies of commercial banks’, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 26 (4), pp. 875–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koop, R. and V.K. Smith (1982), ‘An evaluation of alternative indexes of technological change’, unpublished Working Paper, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumbhakar, S.C. (1993), ‘Production risk, technical efficiency and panel data’, Economics Letters, 41, pp. 11–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, G. and P. Welzel (1996), ‘Efficiency and technical progress in banking: empirical results for a panel of German cooperative banks’, Journal of Banking and Finance, 20, pp. 1003–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maudos, J., J.M. Pastor and J. Quesada (1996), ‘Technical progress in Spanish banking: 1985–1994’, University of Valencia and IVIE Discussion Paper, WPEC 96–06

    Google Scholar 

  • McKillop, D.G., J.C. Glass and Y. Morikawa (1996), ‘The composite cost function and efficiency in giant Japanese banks’, Journal of Banking and Finance, 20, pp. 1651–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meeusen, W. and J. van den Broeck (1977), ‘Efficiency estimation from Cobb-Douglas production functions with composed error, International Economic Review, 18, pp. 435–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Mester, L.J. (1996), ‘A study of bank efficiency taking into account risk-preferences’, Journal of Banking and Finance, 20, pp. 1025–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, K. and N.M. Onvural (1996), ‘Economies of scale and scope at large commercial banks: evidence from the Fourier Flexible functional form’, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 28 (2), pp. 178–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R.A. (1984), ‘Regulation, capital vintage, and technical change in the electric utility industry’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 66, February, pp. 59–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, R.E., P. Schmidt and D.M. Waldman (1980), ‘A Monte Carlo study of estimators of stochastic frontier production functions’, Journal of Econometrics, 13, pp. 67–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sealey, C. and J.T. Lindley (1977), ‘Inputs, outputs and a theory of production and cost at depository financial institution’, Journal of Finance, 32, pp.1251–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, R.E. (1980), ‘Likelihood functions for generalised stochastic frontier estimation’, Journal of Econometrics, 13, pp. 57–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolstov, G.P. (1962), Fourier Series, London: Prentice-Hall

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2001 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Altunbaş, Y., Molyneux, P. (2001). Technical Change in European Banking. In: Gardener, E.P.M., Versluijs, P.C. (eds) Bank Strategies and Challenges in the New Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780333992760_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics