Skip to main content

Symbolic Representations of the Nation: Baden, Bavaria, and Saxony, c.1860–80

  • Chapter
Different Paths to the Nation

Abstract

Imperial Germany (the Kaiserreich) was founded by the proclamation of 18 January 1871 in the Hall of Mirrors at Versailles, after a series of conflicts conventionally known as the ‘wars of unification’. The new state was created largely by Prussian military success and the ingenuity of Otto von Bismarck — or so the story has usually gone. Admittedly, such a summary does not do justice to recent master narratives of modern German history provided by the likes of James Sheehan, Thomas Nipperdey, or Hans-Ulrich Wehler. These authors have acknowledged both the importance of social and economic factors in leading to unification and the continuing diversity of the German territories afterward. Nevertheless, most historical accounts continue to suggest that the German nation was forged primarily in a ‘revolution from above.’ Even more significantly, having described pre-unification ‘Germany’ as a tapestry of regional diversity, historians grow less cautious once the threshold of 1871 is passed. Typically, they revert to generalizing statements about ‘German politics’, ‘German society’, and ‘German nationalism’ — all in the singular.1 Regional historians have been chipping away at this Prussocentric, uniform interpretation for some time now, by juxtaposing it to divergent developments in Germany’s federal states. In doing so, they have offered a major re-evaluation of German history.2 Arguably, however, their conclusions have yet to be fully assimilated by ‘mainstream’ German historiography.3

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Recent general accounts of on Imperial Germany include: T. Nipperdey, Deutsche Geschichte 1866–1918, 2 vols (Munich, 1990–92)

    Google Scholar 

  2. V. Berghahn, Imperial Germany, 1871–1914: Economy, Society, Culture, and Politics (Providence, 1994 )

    Google Scholar 

  3. H.-U. Wehler, Deutsche Gesellschaftsgeschichte Bd.3: Von der ‘Deutschen Doppelrevolution’ bis zum Beginn des Ersten Weltkrieges, 1849–1914 (Munich, 1995)

    Google Scholar 

  4. J.J. Sheehan, German History 1770–1866 (Oxford, 1989 ).

    Google Scholar 

  5. See also: R. Chickering (ed.), Imperial Germany: A Historiographical Companion (Westport, 1996 ).

    Google Scholar 

  6. For cultural approaches to nationalism, see among others: E. François et al.(eds), Nation und Emotion (Göttingen, 1995 )

    Google Scholar 

  7. H.-G. Haupt and C. Tacke, ‘Die Kultur des Nationalen’, in: W. Hardtwig and H.-U. Wehler (eds), Kulturgeschichte heute (Göttingen, 1996), pp. 257–85.

    Google Scholar 

  8. See, for example: J. Retallack (ed.), Saxony in German History: Culture, Society, and Politics, 1830–1933 (Ann Arbor, 2000 ).

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. Retallack, ‘Society and politics in Saxony in the nineteenth and twentieth Century: reflections on recent research’, Archiv für Sozialgeschichte 38 (1998), 396–457.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Celia Applegate, A Nation of Provincials: The German Idea of Heimat (Berkeley, 1990 );

    Google Scholar 

  11. C. Tacke, Denkmal im sozialen Raum. Nationale Symbole in Deutschland und Frankreich im 19: Jahrhundert (Göttingen, 1995 );

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Confino, The Nation as Local Metaphor: Württemberg, Imperial Germany, and National Memory, 1871–1918 (Chapel Hill, 1997 ).

    Google Scholar 

  13. See, for instance: M. Hughes, Nationalism and Society: Germany 1800–1945 (London, 1988 );

    Google Scholar 

  14. O. Dann, Nation und Nationalismus in Deutschland 1770–1990 (Munich, 1993 ).

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. Sperber, The European Revolutions, 1848–1851 (Cambridge, 1994), esp. pp. 250 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  16. See: R. Dietrich, ‘Preußen als Besatzungsmacht im Königreich Sachsen, 1866–1868’, Jahrbuch fair die Geschichte Mittel- und Ostdeutschlands 5 (1956), 273–93;

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. Retallack, “Why can’t a Saxon be more like a Prussian?” Regional Identities and the Birth of Modern Political Culture in Germany, 1866–7’, Canadian Journal of History 32 (1997), 26–55.

    Google Scholar 

  18. A. Kraus, Geschichte Bayerns. Von den Anfängen bis zur Gegenwart (Munich, 1983), p. 562 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  19. N. Buschmann, Einkreisung und Waffenbruderschaft. Die öffentliche Deutung von Krieg und Nation in Deutschland, 1850–1871 (Göttingen, 2003 ).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. W. Hardtwig, Geschichtskultur und Wissenschaft (Munich, 1990 ), p. 278.

    Google Scholar 

  21. See: W. Conze and D. Groh, Die Arbeiterbewegung in der nationalen Bewegung (Stuttgart, 1966 ), pp. 94f., 110f.; Hardtwig, Geschichtskultur, p. 287 f.;

    Google Scholar 

  22. F. Schellack, Nationalfeiertage in Deutschland von 1871 bis 1945 (Frankfurt a.M., 1990), pp. 86 f.

    Google Scholar 

  23. For examples of Social Democratic activities against Sedan Day, compare: H. Müller, ‘Die deutsche Arbeiterklasse und die Sedanfeiern. Zum antimilitärischen Kampf der Sozialdemokratischen Arbeiterpartei in den ersten Jahren nach der Reichsgründung’, Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaft, 17 (1969), 1554–64;

    Google Scholar 

  24. G. Birk, ‘Der Tag von Sedan: Intentionen, Resonanz und Widerstand (1871–1895)’, Jahrbuch für Volkskunde und Kulturgeschichte, 25 (1982), 95–110;

    Google Scholar 

  25. A. Hall, Scandal, Sensation, and Social Democracy: The SPD Press and Wilhelmine Germany, 1890–1914 (Cambridge, 1977 ), p. 57.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Confino, Nation as Local Metaphor, p. 33; T. Schieder, Das Deutsche Kaiserreich von 1871 als Nationalstaat, (Cologne, 1961 ), p. 129.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. W.K. Blessing, Staat und Kirche in der Gesellschaft. Institutionelle Autorität und mentaler Wandel in Bayern während des 19. Jahrhunderts (Göttingen, 1982 ), pp. 181, 190.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. W.K. Blessing, ‘Der monarchische Kult, politische Loyalität und die Arbeiterbewegung im deutschen Kaiserreich’, in: G.A. Ritter (ed.), Arbeiterkultur (Königstein, 1979 ), pp. 185–208;

    Google Scholar 

  29. Blessing, Staat und Kirche; A. Green, Fatherlands. State Building and Nationhood in Nineteenth-Century Germany (Cambridge, 2001 ), pp. 307, 320, 334f.

    Google Scholar 

  30. For details on Sedan Days in Munich, see: N. Freytag, ‘Sedantage in München. Gemeindefeiern, Komiteefeste und Vereinsgedenken’, Zeitschrift für bayerische Landesgeschichte 61 (1998), 383–406.

    Google Scholar 

  31. M. Jeismann, Das Vaterland der Feinde. Studien zum nationalen Feindbegriff und Selbstverständnis in Deutschland und Frankreich, 1792–1918 (Stuttgart, 1992 ).

    Google Scholar 

  32. H. Kretzschmar, ‘Das sächsische Königtum im 19. Jahrhundert’, Historische Zeitschrift 170 (1950), 457–93, here p. 488.

    Google Scholar 

  33. B. Ulrich et al. (eds), Untertan in Uniform. Militär und Militarismus im Kaiserreich, 1871–1914: Quellen und Dokumente (Frankfurt a.M., 2001 ), p. 53.

    Google Scholar 

  34. H. Starke, ‘Der Empfang der sächsischen Truppen in Dresden am 11. Juli 1871. Ein Historiengemälde von Friedrich Wilhelm Heine aus dem Jahr 1879’, in J. Retallack (ed.), Sachsen in Deutschland. Politik, Kultur und Gesellschaft 1830–1918 (Bielefeld-Gütersloh, 2000 ), pp. 143–70. For details of the festival programme and itinerary, see Stadtarchiv Dresden (hereafter StadtA Dresden), 17.2.1, Kapsel A 5/VI.

    Google Scholar 

  35. See, for instance: M. Dittrich, Das Armee-Fest in Dresden zur Feier des 800 jährigen Jubiläums des Hauses Wettin am 14. 16. und 18. Juni 1889 (Zwickau, 1899 ), pp. 9–16.

    Google Scholar 

  36. StadtA Dresden 17.2.1, Kapsel A5/VI: ‘Der Sieges-Einzug’, p. 14; see also M. Dittrich, König Albert und Prinz Georg von Sachsen, die ersten Generalfeldmarschälle aus dem Königshause Wettin (Minden, 1896), pp. 36 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  37. StadtA Dresden 17.2.1, Kapsel A5/VI: ‘Der Sieges-Einzug’, p. 5, 9, 13; see also Dittrich, König Albert und seine Sachsen, p. 53. On Saxon competition with other states regarding contributions to German unification, see also: Weichlein, ’Saxons into Germans’, p. 177. Considering that the Saxon Crown Prince Albert had fought the Prussians only four years before, it was remarkable that the Saxon high command was very successful in the pursuit of military accolades. After his essential contribution to the German victory on 18 August 1870, Albert received the highest honour of commanding the newly formed Maas Army; Militärgeschichtliches Forschungsamt (ed.), Entscheidung 1870: Der deutsch-französische Krieg (Stuttgart, 1970), pp. 84 f.

    Google Scholar 

  38. For further discussion, see: E. Fink, Region and Nation in Early Imperial Germany: Transformations of Popular Allegiances and Political Culture in the Period of Nation Building (PhD thesis, Toronto, 2004 ), esp. pp. 304–25.

    Google Scholar 

  39. On some of the diplomatic infighting behind the scenes, see: H. Philippi, ‘Preußisch-sächsische Verstimmungen im Jahrzehnt nach der Reichsgründung. Ein Beitrag zu Bismarcks Verhältnis zu den Bundesstaaten’, Jahrbuch für die Geschichte Mittel- und Ostdeutschlands 15 (1966), 225–68.

    Google Scholar 

  40. See: K.B. Murr, “’Treue bis in den Tod”’. Kriegsmythen in der bayerischen Geschichtspolitik im Vormärz’, in: N. Buschmann and D. Langewiesche (eds), Der Krieg in den Gründungsmythen europäischer Nationen und der USA (Frankfurt a.M.-New York, 2003 ), pp. 138–74.

    Google Scholar 

  41. K.W. Deutsch, Nationalism and Social Communication: An Inquiry into the Foundations of Nationality (2nd edn, Cambridge, Mass., 1967), esp. pp. 96–100, views a ‘wide complementarity of social communication’ as an essential constitutive aspect of a nation. By social communication, Deutsch means the storage, recollection, transmission, recombination, and reapplication of memories, symbols, habits, and operating preferences by larger groups of people.

    Google Scholar 

  42. On this, see: M.L. Anderson, Practicing Democracy: Elections and Political Culture in Imperial Germany (Princeton, 2000 ).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2007 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fink, E. (2007). Symbolic Representations of the Nation: Baden, Bavaria, and Saxony, c.1860–80. In: Cole, L. (eds) Different Paths to the Nation. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230801424_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230801424_11

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-27960-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-230-80142-4

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics