Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Building and Maintaining a Post-9/11 All-Volunteer Military Force

  • Chapter
The Impact of 9/11 on Politics and War

Part of the book series: The Day that Changed Everything? ((911))

Abstract

The force structure of the American military has changed during and after every major war. After World War II and the Korean War, the United States maintained its first long-standing force not engaged in major combat operations, and did so on the basis of conscription. During the Vietnam War, the United States deployed a large number of conscripts without participation of the Reserve Component. After Vietnam, the American government replaced conscription with an All-Volunteer Force. The military campaigns initiated after September 11, 2001, similarly have seen changes in the way the United States raises forces for war, including the recruitment and retention of an increasingly diverse force as well as growing reliance on the Reserves and civilians.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. The writing of this chapter was supported by the U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences under Contract W74V8H-05-K-0007. The views expressed in this chapter are those of the authors and not necessarily of the Army Research Institute, the Department of the Army, or the Department of Defense.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See Meredith A. Kleykamp, “College, Jobs, or the Military? Enlistment during a Time of War,” Social Science Quarterly 87, no. 2 (June 2006): 272–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ann Scott Tyson, “Military Waivers for Ex-Convicts Increase,” Washington Post,April 22, 2008; Lawrence Kapp, Recruiting and Retention: An Overview of FY2005 and FY2006 for Active and Reserve Component Enlisted Personnel (Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, 2006), 3.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Beth J. Asch, John A. Romley, and Mark E. Totten, The Quality of Personnel in the Enlisted Ranks (Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 2005), 9.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Barry L. Scribner et al., “Are Smart Tankers Better? AFQT and Military Productivity,” Armed Forces & Society 12, no. 2 (1986): 193–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bruce R. Orvis, Michael T. Childress, and J. Michael Polich, Effect of Personnel Quality on the Performance of Patriot Air Defense System Operators (Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bruce R. Orvis and Beth J. Asch, Military Recruiting: Trends, Outlook, and Implications (Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 2000), 42.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Paul Sackett and Anne Mavor, eds., Attitudes, Aptitudes, and Aspirations of American Youth: Implications for Military Recruitment (Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2003), 93–94.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Charles C. Moskos, “From Institution to Occupation: Trends in Military Organization,” Armed Forces & Society 4, no. 1 (1977): 41–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Harry A. Marmion, The Case against a Volunteer Army (Chicago: Quadrangle Books, 1971)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Morris Janowitz and Charles C. Moskos, “Racial Composition in the All-Volunteer Force,” Armed Forces & Society 1, no. 1 (1974): 109–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. David R. Segal and Mady Wechsler Segal, Army Recruitment Goals Endangered as Percent of African American Enlistees Declines (Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  13. David R. Segal, Recruiting for Uncle Sam (Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas, 1989), 112.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Michael Wilson et al., Youth Attitude Tracking Study 1992: Propensity and Advertising Report (Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 1993)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mady Wechsler Segal and David R. Segal, Latinos Claim Larger Share of U.S. Military Personnel (Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  16. David L. Leal, “American Public Opinions toward the Military: Differences by Race, Gender, and Class?” Armed Forces & Society 32, no. 1 (2005), 131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Anita U. Hattiangadi, Gary Lee, and Aline O. Quester, Recruiting Hispanics: The Marine Corps Experience, Final Report (Alexandria, VA: Center for Naval Analyses, 2004), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  18. The largest proportion of noncitizen soldiers is from the Philippines, followed by Mexico. The complete distribution of countries of citizenship for noncitizen service members is in Margaret Mikyung Lee and Ruth Ellen Wasem, Expedited Citizenship through Military Service: Policy and Issues (Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, 2003), 7.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hattiangadi et al., Non-Citizens in Today’s Military: Final Report (Alexandria, VA: Center for Naval Analyses, 2005), 32.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Martin Binkin and Shirley J. Bach, Women and the Military (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1977), 4

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lory Manning, Women in the Military: Where they Stand, 5th ed. (Washington, DC: Women’s Research and Education Institute, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Martin Binkin, Who Will Fight the Next War? The Changing Face of the American Military (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1993), 18.

    Google Scholar 

  23. David R. Segal et al., “Propensity to Serve in the U.S. Military: Temporal Trends and Subgroup Differences,” Armed Forces & Society 25, no. 3 (1999): 416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. For additional information on how cultural values shape women’s military roles, see Mady Wechsler Segal, “Women’s Military Roles Cross-Nationally: Past, Present, and Future,” Gender & Society 9, no. 6 (December 1995): 757–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. From the beginning of OEF until May 1, 2008, 590 women have been injured and 107 women have been killed in action. See Headquarters, U.S. Department of the Army, Army Regulation 600–13, Army Policy for the Assignment of Female Soldiers,March 27, 1992; Margaret C. Harrell et al., Assessing the Assignment Policy for Army Women, (Arlington, VA: RAND, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  26. The Reserve Component includes the Army and Air National Guard, the Army Reserve, the Air Force Reserve, the Navy Reserve, the Marine Corps Reserve, and the Coast Guard Reserve. See Christine E. Wormuth et al., The Future of the National Guard and Reserves: The Beyond Goldwater-Nichols Phase III Report (Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  27. For more information on the ongoing discussion framing Reserve forces as strategic versus operational forces, see Ralph Wipfli and Dallas D. Owens, Colloquium Brief: State of the U.S. Military Reserve Components (Carlisle Barracks, PA: U.S. Army War College and 21st Century Defense Initiative of the Brookings Institution, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  28. David R. Segal and Mady Wechsler Segal, U.S. Military’s Reliance on the Reserves (Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Timothy I. Sullivan, The Abrams Doctrine: Is It Viable and Enduring in the 21stCentury? (Carlisle Barracks, PA: Strategic Studies Institute of the U.S. Army War College, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ruth H. Phelps and Beatrice J. Farr, eds. Reserve Component Soldiers as Peacekeepers (Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  31. David R. Segal, “Military Sociology,” in 21st Century Sociology: A Reference Handbook, ed. Clifton D. Bryant and Dennis L. Peck (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Joseph. E. Whitlock, How to Make Army Force Generation Work for the Army’s Reserve Components (Carlisle Barracks, PA: Strategic Studies Institute of the Army War College, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lynn E. Davis et al., Stretched Thin: Army Forces for Sustained Operations (Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 2005), 3.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Jennifer K. Elsea and Nina M. Serafino, Private Security Contractors in Iraq: Background, Legal Status, and Other Issues (Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, 2007), 24.

    Google Scholar 

  35. P. W. Singer, Corporate Warriors (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Allison Stanger and Mark Eric Williams, “Private Military Corporations: Benefits and Costs of Outsourcing Security,” Yale Journal of International Affairs 2, no. 1 (Fall/Winter 2006): 5.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Elsea and Serafino, Private Security Contractors, 3; William M. Solis (statement), Military Operations: Implementation of Existing Guidance and Other Actions Needed to Improve DOD’s Oversight and Management of Contractors in Future Operations (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Accountability Office, 2008), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  38. P. W. Singer, Can’t Win with ‘Em, Can’t Win without ‘Em: Private Military Contractors and Counterinsurgency (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Rajiv Chandrasekaran, Imperial Life in the Emerald City (New York: Vintage Books, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Maryland, USA

    Karin K. De Angelis (Doctoral Student in Military Sociology)

  2. Military Organization, University of Maryland, USA

    David R. Segal (Professor of Sociology and Director of the Center for Research)

Authors
  1. Karin K. De Angelis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David R. Segal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. White Plains, New York, USA

    Matthew J. Morgan

Copyright information

© 2009 Matthew J. Morgan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

De Angelis, K.K., Segal, D.R. (2009). Building and Maintaining a Post-9/11 All-Volunteer Military Force. In: Morgan, M.J. (eds) The Impact of 9/11 on Politics and War. The Day that Changed Everything?. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230623712_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation