Abstract
Theories that attribute famine to sinister leaders in distant lands can be attractive. They are part of a ritual of self-affirmation, because they confirm the superiority of our civilization or political system vis-à-vis “the other.” They paint things in black and white. For this reason, they are also politically expedient, and this perspective goes beyond famine. Deaths we attribute to the murderous policies of other regimes can be chalked up to “collateral damage” when they are inflicted by us. These theories, though convenient and exceedingly digestible, are rarely if ever entirely accurate.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
J. Stalin, “Stalin’s Reply,” Military Affairs 13, no. 2 (1949): 77.
Copyright information
© 2009 Nicholas Ganson
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ganson, N. (2009). Conclusion. In: The Soviet Famine of 1946–47 in Global and Historical Perspective. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230620964_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230620964_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-37792-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-62096-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)