Skip to main content
  • 105 Accesses

Abstract

Theories that attribute famine to sinister leaders in distant lands can be attractive. They are part of a ritual of self-affirmation, because they confirm the superiority of our civilization or political system vis-à-vis “the other.” They paint things in black and white. For this reason, they are also politically expedient, and this perspective goes beyond famine. Deaths we attribute to the murderous policies of other regimes can be chalked up to “collateral damage” when they are inflicted by us. These theories, though convenient and exceedingly digestible, are rarely if ever entirely accurate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. J. Stalin, “Stalin’s Reply,” Military Affairs 13, no. 2 (1949): 77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2009 Nicholas Ganson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ganson, N. (2009). Conclusion. In: The Soviet Famine of 1946–47 in Global and Historical Perspective. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230620964_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230620964_8

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-37792-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-230-62096-4

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics