Skip to main content

Abstract

Senegal is a bit of a conundrum for students of both democracy and organized labor. Senegal is the anomalous African country that lapsed only briefly into one-party politics during the post-independence period. Following the elimination of opposition parties through a familiar combination of co-optation and suppression in the late 1960s, by the mid-1970s the regime of President Leopold Senghor had once again legalized political contestation on the part of a limited number of opposition parties. In 1981, Senghor’s successor, Abdou Diouf, decreed unlimited rights of party formation and contestation.

Note: The views expressed in this essay are those of the author, based on dissertation research in Senegal, and do not necessarily reflect those of the World Bank.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. For theoretical and empirical underpinnings of this statement, see Seymour Martin Lipset, Martin A. Trow, and James S. Coleman, Union Democracy: The Internal Politics of the International Typographical Union (Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 1977);

    Google Scholar 

  2. and Gary Marks, Unions in Politics: Britain, Germany and the United States in the 19th and Early 20th Centuries (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1989).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. As Jonathan Barker has shown for Senegal’s rural areas, the factional leader is an intermediary between other factions lower and higher on the pyramid of clan groupings that exist between the individual and the state, whose personal status depends on the ability to provide flows of material resources. This authority, however, is highly precarious, since “factional leaders at lower levels can transform their loyalties from one higher-level faction to another with relative impunity.” Barker, “Political Factionalism in Senegal,” Canadian Journal of African Studies 7, no. 2 (1973): 292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Donal Cruise O’Brien, “Senegal,” in John Dunn, ed., West African States: Failure and Promise (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978), 179–80.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Senghor at Tunis in 1975, quoted by Christine Desouches, Le Parti démocratique sénégalaise: une opposition légale en Afrique (Paris: Berger-Levrault, 1983), 28.

    Google Scholar 

  6. For a highly cogent account of the splintering of the underground opposition following democratization, see Momar Coumba Diop, and Mamadou Diouf, Le Sénégal sous Abdou Diouf (Paris: Editions Karthala, 1990), 214–15.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Jon Kraus

Copyright information

© 2007 Jon Kraus, ed.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bergen, G. (2007). Labor, Democracy, and Development in Senegal. In: Kraus, J. (eds) Trade Unions and the Coming of Democracy in Africa. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230610033_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics