Abstract
Tolkien knew that his work would have an afterlife that he could not control. Indeed, as we saw in the last chapter, he believed that an author should not aspire to such ‘purposed domination’. It may seem strange that this belief did not prevent him from criticising severely various misreadings and distorted adaptations of his works. But there is no inconsistency in Tolkien’s position. He hoped that people who had read and understood his work would freely apply it to their own experiences: he was not waiving the expectation that they would read it with understanding in the first place. Similarly, his youthful ambition that his cycle of stories would ‘leave scope for other minds and hands, wielding paint and music and drama’ did not envisage a free-for-all in which the distinctive ‘tone and quality’ of the original invention would be wholly lost.1 Much of what has happened has disappointed — or is simply irrelevant to — Tolkien’s hopes, but if we look for cultural phenomena which are both of value in themselves and intrinsically and necessarily related to Tolkien’s invention, we will not by any means draw a complete blank.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
J. R. Searle, Minds, Brains and Science (Harmondsworth; Penguin Books, 1984), pp. 30–1.
Emily Perkins, ‘My very own brush with movie glamour’ Independent on Sunday (London), 12 January 2003.
W. H. Auden, review of The Return of the King (NewYorkTimes, 22 January, 1956); ‘The Quest Hero’ in N. D. Isaacs and R. A. Zimbardo (eds.), Tolkien and the Critics (University of Notre Dame Press, 1968); ‘The Guilty Vicarage’ in The Dyer’s Hand (Faber and Faber, 1963), pp. 146–58.
E.Wilson, ‘Oo,ThoseAwfulOres!’Nation 182, 14Apri11956;P.Toynbee,Observer, 6 August 1961; E. Muir, ‘A Boy’s World’ Observer, 27 November, 1955.
R. Giddings, Introduction, and Fred Inglis, ‘Gentility and Powerlessness: Tolkien and the New Class’ in R. Giddings (ed.), This Far Land (Vision Press, 1983), pp. 8, 29–31.
Mark Lawson on BBC’s Newsnight Review, 14 December 2001.
Colin Wilson, The Strength to Dream: Literature and the Imagination (Gollancz, 1962), p. 141.
Several of the essays in G. Clark and D.Timmons, J. R. R.Tolkien and His Literary Resonances, and in P. Reynolds and G. GoodKnight, Proceedings of the J. R. R.Tolkien Centenary Conference 1992 (Mythopoeic Press and theTolkien Society, 1995) seem to me to drift into this overvaluing of approximate resemblances. I would except Tanya Caroline Wood’s piece in Clark and Timmons, which convincingly argues that Tolkien’s ‘On Fairy Stories’ resembles Sidney’s ‘Defense of Poesy’ in its structure and rhetorical strategies.
Alan Garner, The Owl Service (Collins, 1967).
See Christopher Tolkien (ed.), Pictures by Tolkien (London: HarperCollins, 1992), especially nos. 5–6 (Rivendell), 35 (Gondolin) and 36 (Tol Sirion).
See The Stones ofVenice, ed. J. G. Links (NewYork: Da Capo Press, 1960), Book One, XI, pp. 100–11.
See Paul Kocher, Master of Middle-earth (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1974), pp. 117–43 for a painstaking analysis of Aragorn’s personality.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2003 Brian Rosebury
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rosebury, B. (2003). The Cultural Phenomenon. In: Tolkien. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230599987_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230599987_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4039-1263-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-59998-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)