Skip to main content
  • 42 Accesses

Abstract

Stories of people power and the fall of powerful people pervade world history. So what is significant about the present circumstance? What supports the claim that this is a unique era of leadership accountability? Certainly the scale and scope of recent events are seen as new, and there have been many ground-breaking precedents and initiatives. But these observations raise a further question that has not been properly considered: why is there such a concern about ‘distant others’ by ‘disinterested others’ on a global scale? In some circumstances it is arguable that the conduct of powerful people has an actual or potential impact on the lives of unrelated populations in distant places, but that is relatively rare and there are usually many other abuses of power closer to home which should demand attention. We could explain the response in terms of ‘a common feeling of justice’, but why does that feeling exist, and why is it seemingly common around the world?

Let all men know how empty and worthless is the power of kings.

King Canute (Knut), England, c.1000 AD

You are the G8. We are the 6 billion.

Banner at the 2001 Genoa protests

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Greenfield, S. (1997) The human brain: a guided tour. Phoenix: London.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Williams, C. (2002) ‘New security’ risks and public educating: the significance of recent evolutionary brain science, Journal of Risk Research, 5(3), pp225–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wilson, E.O. (1998) Consilience: the unity of knowledge. Little, Brown: London, p188.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Byrne, D. & Whiten, A. (1988) Machiavellian intelligence: social expertise and the evolution of intelligence in monkeys, apes and humans. Clarendon Press: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Keating, C.F. & Heltman, K.R. (1994) Dominance and deception in children and adults: are leaders the best misleaders? Personality and social psychology bulletin, 20, pp312–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee, Yun-Joo (2005) Perceptions of leadership and development in South Korea and Egypt, PhD thesis in progress. School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nye, J.S. (2004) Power in the global information age. Routledge: London.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wooley, Benjamin (2004) The herbalist: Nicholas Culpeper and the fight for freedom. HarperCollins: London.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Curzon, L.B. (1998) Dictionary of law. Pitman: London.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Curzon, L.B. (1998) Dictionary of law. Pitman: London.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Green, Stuart (2004) Cheating, Law and Philosophy, 23, pp137–85, 174.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rawls, John (1999) The law of peoples. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, Mass., p100.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cockburn, Patrick (2004) Apocalypse now?, The Independent on Sunday, 11 April, p10.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J. (1992) Cognitive adaptations for social exchange, in J.H. Barkow, L. Cosmides & J. Tooby (eds), The adapted mind: evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. Oxford University Press: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wilson, Edward O. (2002) The future of life. Little, Brown: London.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wilson, Edward O. (2002) The future of life. Little, Brown: London.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fletcher, T. (1997) Risk and risk assessment: the importance of getting everyone involved, Environment and Health, 2, pp5–6.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Laurance, J. (1998) Best smoking ads are those that knock industry, The Independent, 11 March, p7.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Williams, C. (2002) ‘New security’ risks and public educating: the significance of recent evolutionary brain science, Journal of Risk Research, 5(3), pp225–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fukuyama, Francis (1995) The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. Penguin: London.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Giddens, Anthony (1990) The consequences of modernity. Polity Press: Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mackie, J.L. (1980) The cement of the universe: a study of causation. Oxford University Press: Oxford.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Hajnal, Peter. I. (2002) Civil society in the information age. Ashgate: Aldershot.

    Google Scholar 

  24. McMillan, John (2004) How democracy was subverted in Peru, Stanford Graduate School of Business Research News — http://www.gsb.stanford.edu/news/research/polecon_peru.shtml

    Google Scholar 

  25. Parry, Lloyd (2001) THE TXT MSG REVOLUTION, The Independent (Review), 23 January, pp1,7.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ramonet, Ignacio (2004) Spanish lies, Le Monde diplomatique, April, p1.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Weiner, N. (1949) Cybernetics: or control and communication in man and machine. MIT Press: Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Foucault, Michel (trans. Sheridan, A.) (1995) Discipline and punish: the birth of prison. Vintage Books: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Taylor, Jane (2000) Citizens century, Positive News (UK), 26, p1.

    Google Scholar 

  30. McLuhan, Marshall (1994) Understanding media: the extensions of man. MIT Press: Cambridge, Mass., pp302–3.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lee, Yun-Joo (2003) Realities and perceptions of leadership and development in South Korea and Egypt, unpublished PhD thesis, School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Bern, D.J. (1972) Self-perception theory, in L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 6. Academic Press: New York, p5.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Reber, Arthur S. (1995) Dictionary of psychology. Penguin: London, p703.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Weiner, N. (1949) Cybernetics: or control and communication in man and machine. MIT Press: Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lyman, P. & Varian, H.R. (2003) How much information? — http://www.sims.berkeley.edu/research/projects/how-much-info-2003/

    Google Scholar 

  36. Surowiecki, James (2004) The wisdom of crowds: why the many are smarter than the few. Little, Brown: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Fletcher, W. (2004) Delusions of the masses, Times Higher Education Supplement, 23 July, p30.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Parry, Geraint (1969) Political elites. George Allen & Unwin: London, p37.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Bloom, Howard (2000) Global brain: the evolution of mass mind from the big bang to the 21st century. John Wiley: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Jolly, A. (1999) Lucy’s legacy: sex and intelligence in human evolution. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Leslie, M. (2001) Tales of the sea. New Scientist, 2275, pp32–5.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2006 Christopher Williams

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Williams, C. (2006). Social Impetus: Deceit, Evolution and ICT. In: Leadership Accountability in a Globalizing World. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230596825_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics