Skip to main content

Selective Adaptation of Anglo-American Corporate Governance Practices in Japan

  • Chapter
Changing Corporate Governance Practices in China and Japan
  • 227 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter applies a selective adaptation framework3 for analyzing institutional change and business practices in corporate governance in post-bubble Japan. With the economy facing near-collapse in the 1990s, Japan undertook massive corporate governance reform. The Japanese government promptly introduced new laws that put in place new institutional settings for Japan’s corporate governance. New laws and revisions of existing laws related to corporate governance, securities market transactions, and laws governing transparency and information disclosure are among the many changes made in the reform process.

“We’re worried that as the number of companies with takeover defenses increases (in Japan) it’s going to lead to an entrenchment of management and loss of the healthy pressure from shareholders on management to focus on shareholder returns.”

Marc Goldstein, representative director, Institutional Shareholder Services

An earlier version of this chapter was presented at the Law and Society Association Annual Conference in Berlin (“Law and Society in the 21st Century”), July 25–28, 2007.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ahmadjian, C. L., and Lincoln, J. R. (2001) “Keiretsu, Governance, and Learning: Case Studies in Change from the Japanese Automobile Industry,” Organization Science, 12, 683–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aoki, M. (1988) Information, Incentives, and Bargaining in the Japanese Economy (New York: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Araki, T. (2005) “Corporate Governance Reforms, Labor Law Developments, and the Future of Japan’s Practice-Dependent Stakeholder Model,” Japan Labor Review, 2, 26–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arikawa, Y., and Mitsusada, Y. (2008) The Adoption of Poison Pills and Managerial Entrenchment: Evidence from Japan. Discussion Paper Series 08-E-006 (Tokyo: RIETI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, C. A., and Ghoshal, S. (1998) Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution (second edition) (Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bebchuk, L. A., and Cohen, A. (2005) “The Costs of Entrenched Boards,” Journal of Financial Economics, 78, 409–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. (1992) Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cailluet, L. (1998) “Selective Adaptation of American Management Models: The Longterm Relationship of Pechiney with the United States,” in M. Kipping and O. Bjarnar (eds.), The Americanization of European Business: The European Response to the US Productivity Drive (London: Routledge), pp. 190–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan-Tiberghien, J. (2004a) “Gender as Intersectionality: Multiple Discrimination against Minority Women in Japan,” in M. Nakamura (ed.), Changing Japanese Business, Economy and Society: Globalization of Post-Bubble Japan (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 158–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan-Tiberghien, J. (2004b) Gender and Human Rights Politics in Japan: Global Norms and Domestic Networks (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Corning, P. A. (1996) “Evolutionary Economics: Metaphor or Unifying Paradigm?” Journal of Social and Evolutionary Systems, 18, 421–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Development Bank of Japan (2007) Do M&A Improve Corporate Financial Performance in Japan? (Tokyo: Development Bank of Japan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A. (1996) The Making of Economic Policy (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dore, R. (1983) “Goodwill and the Spirit of Market Capitalism,” British Journal of Sociology, 34, 459–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C. (1991) “Innovation, Changes of Techno-Economic Paradigm and Biological Analogies in Economics,” Revue Ă©conomique, 42, 211–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilson, R. J., and Milhaupt, C. (2004) “Choice as Regulatory Reform: The Case of Japanese Corporate Governance.” Columbia Law and Economics Working Paper No. 251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gompers, P., Ishii, J., and Metrick, A. (2003) “Corporate Governance and Equity Prices,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 107–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, M. (2002) “Takeover Defenses Work. Is That Such a Bad Thing?” Stanford Law Review, 55, 819–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fruin, W. M. (1992) The Japanese Enterprise System — Competitive Strategies and Cooperative Structures (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fruin, W. M. (1997) Knowledge Works — Managing Intellectual Capital at Toshiba (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fruin, W. M., and Nakamura, M. (1997) “Top-Down Production Management: A Recent Trend in the Japanese Productivity-Enhancement Movement,” Managerial and Decision Economics, 18, 131–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A., and Nakayama, K. (2007) “Rapid Face-Selective Adaptation of an Early Extrastriate Component in MEG,” Cerebral Cortex, 17, 63–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermalin, B., and Weisbach, M. (2003) “Board of Directors as an Endogenously Determined Institution: A Survey of the Economic Literature,” Economic Policy Review, April, 7–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirose, S., Fujita, T., and Yanagawa, N. (2007) Poison Pills and Firm Performance: Japan, 2005(Baishu donyusaku no gyoseki joho koka: 2005 Nihon) (in Japanese). Working paper CIRJE-J-182, (Tokyo: University of Tokyo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1980) Culture’s Consequences, London: Sage Publications, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1983) “The Cultural Relativity of Organizational Practices and Theories,” Journal of International Business Studies, 4 (Special Issue on Cross-Cultural Management), 75–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1997) Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind (New York: McGraw-Hill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoshi, T., and Kashyap, A. (2001) Corporate Financing and Governance in Japan: The Road to the Future ( Cambridge, MA, and London: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman P. W., and Gupta, V. (eds.) (2004) Culture, Leadership and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, L., and Potter, P. B. (2006) “Selective Adaptation and Human Rights to Health in China,” Health and Human Rights, 9, 113–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, S. M. (2005) “Business and Society in Japan and the United States,” British Journal of Industrial Relations, 43, 617–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Japan Fair Trade Commission (1993) A Survey of Transactions of Auto Parts (Jidosha Buhin Torihiki ni Kansuru Jittai Chosa) (in Japanese) (Tokyo: Japan Fair Trade Commission).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, S. (1998) “Fitness and the Selective Adaptation of Language,” in J. R. Hurford, M. Studdert-Kennedy, and C. Knight (eds.), Approaches to the Evolution of Language: Social and Cognitive Bases (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiyokawa, Y., and Yamane, H. (2004) “Japanese Views on Labor (nihonjin no rodokan)” (in Japanese), Ohara Shakai Mondai Kenkyujo Journal, 542, 14–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konomi, Y. (2002) Research Report on Corporate Structural Reforms(Kigyo no kozo kaikaku kenkyukai kenkyu katsudo hokokusho) (in Japanese) (Keio Business School, Keio University).

    Google Scholar 

  • Korkie, R., and Nakamura, M. (1997) “Block Holding and Keiretsu in Japan: The Effects of Capital Markets Liberalization Measures on the Stock Market,” Journal of International Money and Finance, 16, 113–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kremers, J., Stepien, M. W., Scholl, H. P. N., and Saito, C. (2003) “Cone Selective Adaptation Influences L- and M-Cone Driven Signals in Electroretinography and Psychophysics,” Journal of Vision, 3, 146–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, J. R. (2006) “Interfirm Networks and the Management of Technology and Innovation in Japan,” in D. H. Whittaker and R. E. Cole (eds.), Perspectives on Technology Management (MOT) in Japan (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 216–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, J. R., and Gerlach, M. L. (2004) Japan’s Network Economy: Structure, Persistence, and Change (New York: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, J. R., Hanada, M., and McBride, K. (1986) “Organizational Structures in Japanese and U.S. Manufacturing,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 338–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikanagi, Y. (2006) “Review of Chan-Tiberghien, Jennifer, Gender and Human Rights Politics in Japan: Global Norms and Domestic Networks, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA. 2004,” Social Science Japan Journal, 9, 162–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milhaupt, C. J. (2005) “In the Shadow of Delaware? The Rise of Hostile Takeovers in Japan,” Columbia Law Review, 105, 2171–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millar, J. A. (1972) “Selective Adaptation,” Policy Sciences, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyashita, A. (2007) “Where do Norms Come From? Foundations of Japan’s Postwar Pacifism,” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 7, 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morck, R., and Nakamura, M. (1999) “Banks and Corporate Control in Japan,” Journal of Finance, 54, 319–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morck, R., and Nakamura, M. (2005) “A Frog in a Well Knows Nothing of the Ocean: A History of Corporate Ownership in Japan,” in R. Morck (ed.), A Histoty of Corporate Governance Around the World: Family Business Groups to Professional Managers (Chicago: NBER and University of Chicago Press), pp. 367–459.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Morck, R., Nakamura, M., and Shivdasani, A. (2000) “Banks, Ownership Structure, and Firm Value in Japan,” Journal of Business, 73, 539–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura, M. (1993) “Japanese Industrial Relations in an International Business Environment,” North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 4, 225–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura, M. (2002) “Mixed Ownership of Industrial Firms in Japan: Debt Financing, Banks and Vertical Keiretsu Groups,” Economic Systems, 26, 231–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura, M. (2006) “Japanese Corporate Governance Practices in the Post-Bubble Era: Implications of Institutional and Legal Reforms in the 1990s and Early 2000s,” International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 3, 233–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, D. (1990a) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • North, D. (1990b) “A Transaction Cost Theory of Politics,” Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2, 355–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogawa, N., and Retherford, R. D. (1993) “Care of the Elderly in Japan: Changing Norms and Expectations,” Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 585–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porta, R. L., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., and Shleifer, A. (1999) “Corporate Ownership Around the World,” Journal of Finance, 54, 471–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potter, P. B. (2003) “Globalization and Economic Regulation in China: Selective Adaptation of Globalized Norms and Practices,” Washington University Global Studies Law Review, 2, 119–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, P. B. (2004) “Legal Reform in China: Institutions, Culture, and Selective Adaptation,” Law and Social Inquiry, 28, 465–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potter, P. B. (2007) “Selective Adaptation and Institutional Capacity: Approaches to Understanding Reception of International Law Under Conditions of Globalization,” Sociology of Law, 66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reischauer, E. O. (1988) The Japanese Today: Change and Opportunity (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Roe, M. J. (2001) “The Shareholder Wealth Maximization Norm and Industrial Organization,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 149, 2063–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sako, M. (1996) “Suppliers’ Associations in the Japanese Automobile Industry: Collective Action for Technology Diffusion,” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 20, 651–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian, A. (1994) Regional Networks: Industrial Adaptation in Silicon Valley and Route 128 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shibata, G., Tse, D., Vertinsky, I., and Wehrung, D. (1991) “Do Norms of Decision-Making Styles, Organizational Design and Management Affect Performance of Japanese Firms? An Exploratory Study of Medium and Large Firms,” Managerial and Decision Economics, 12, 135–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R. W. (1997) “A Survey of Corporate Governance,” Journal of Finance, 52, 737–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiles, K. W. (2006) “The Dissemination of International Liberal Norms: The Case of the ECHR and the UK,” Canadian Journal of Political Science, 39, 135–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teranishi, J. (2003) “Review of Hoshi and Kashyap’s Corporate Financing and Governance in Japan,” Journal of Economic Literature, 41, 566–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsurumi, Y., and Tsurumi, H. (1991) “Value Added Maximization Behavior of Firms and the Japanese Semiconductor Industry,” Managerial and Decision Economics, 12, 123–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. (1996) The Mechanisms of Governance (New York: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshikawa, Y. (2003) Corporate Governance for Improving Firm Value (Kigyo kachi kojo notameno corporate governance) (in Japanese) (Tokyo: Toyo Keizai).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeitlin, J. (2000) “Americanizing British Engineering? Strategic Debate, Selective Adaptation, and Innovative Hybridization in Postwar Reconstruction, 1945–60,” in J. Zeitlin and G. Herrigel (eds.), Americanization and Its Limits (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 123–52.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2008 Masao Nakamura

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nakamura, M. (2008). Selective Adaptation of Anglo-American Corporate Governance Practices in Japan. In: Nakamura, M. (eds) Changing Corporate Governance Practices in China and Japan. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230595156_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics