Skip to main content

National Civil Service Systems and the Implications of Multi-level Governance: Weberianism Revisited?

  • Chapter
The Civil Service in the 21st Century

Abstract

Previous publications in this project demonstrated that state-level administrative systems were affected by intergovernmental interaction. It is important to stress that the notion of intergovernmentalism involves both the exchange between various national states and the exchange between territorial levels within the state. The increased importance of these two types of intergovernmental exchange raises two important questions. The first is whether the available tools for comparative analysis of civil service systems are still adequate. The second is whether the national state is still the most appropriate level of analysis for understanding the nature and dynamics of contemporary governance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alter, K., The European Court’s Political Power. In J.J. Hesse and T.A.J. Toonen (eds), European Yearbook of Government and Public Administration, 3 (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1996), pp. 112–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benz, A., Mehrebenenvervlechtung in der Europaeischen Union. In M. Jachtenfuchs and B. Kohler-Koch (eds), Europaeische Integration (Opladen: Leske & Budrich, 2003), pp. 317–51.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Börzel, T. and C. Sprungk, Undermining Democratic Governance in the Member States? The Europeanization of National Decision Making. Available at <http://web.fu-berlin.de/europa/forschung/docs/boerzel_sprungk_2003.pdf> (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Börzel, T. and C. Sprungk, Undermining Democratic Governance in the Member States? The Europeanization of National Decision-Making. In R. Holzhacker and E. Albaek (eds), Democratic Governance and European Integration (Aldershot: Edward, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Caiden, G., The Administrative State in a Globalizing World: Some Trends and Challenges. In E. Otenyo and N. Lind (eds), Comparative Public Administration: The Essential Readings. Research in Public Policy Analysis and Management, vol. 15 (Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2006), pp. 515–42.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, T. and P. Lægreid, ‘Agencification and Regulatory Reforms’, Automization of the State: From Integrated Administrative Models to Single Purpose Organizations, Conference paper Stanford University, SCANCOR/SOG (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • De Zwaan, J.W. Het Comité van permanent vertegenwoordigers: ontstaan, werkwijze en rol in de besluitvorming van de Europese Gemeenschappen (Deventer: Kluwer, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra, G. and F.M. Van der Meer, ‘Functionele Decentralisatie’, Compendium voor Politick en Samenleving in Nederland (Deventer: Kluwer, 1997) C0700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Gay, P., In Praise of Bureaucracy: Weber, Organization, Ethics (London: Sage, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • Handler, J., Down From Bureaucracy: The Ambiguity of Privatization and Empowerment (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C., O. James, B.G. Peters and C. Scott (eds), Controlling Modern Government: Variety, Commonality and Change (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R., When Giants Learn to Dance: Mastering the Challenge of Strategy, Management and Careers in the 1990s (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler-Koch, B. and R. Eising (eds), The Transformation of Governance in the European Union (London: Routledge, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuypers, P., Rooksignalen: Opstellen over Politiek en Bestuur (Amsterdam: De Balie, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Laffan, B., ‘The European Union Polity: A Union of Regulative, Normative and Cognitive Pillars’, Journal of European Public Policy, 8 (2001), 709–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, J.-E., New Public Management (London: Routledge, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • Majone, G., ‘The Regulatory State and its Legitimacy Problems’, West European Politics, 22 (1999), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marks, G., L. Hooghe and K. Blank, ‘European Integration Since the 1980s: State-Centric Versus Multi-Level Governance’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 34 (1996), 341–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayntz, R., Governance im modernen Staat. In A. Benz (ed.), Governance -Regieren in komplexen Regelsystemen. Eine Einführung (Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2004), pp. 65–76.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Meier, K. and G. Hill, ‘Bureaucracy in the Twenty-First Century. In E. Ferlie, L. Lynn and C. Pollitt (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Public Management (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), pp. 51–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, J., ‘The Many Faces of Europeanization; Europeanization — a Fashionable Term, But Is It Useful?’ Arena Working Papers (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, J., ‘Maybe It Is Time to Rediscover Bureaucracy’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16 (2005), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, D. and T. Gaebler, Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector (Reading, MA: Adaison-Wesley, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, E., Political Authority and Bureaucratic Power (London: Harvester Wheatsleaf, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, E.C. and L. Wouters, ‘The Europeanization of the national bureaucracies?’ In J. Pierre (ed) Bureaucracy in the Modern State (Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 1995), pp. 185–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, E. and V. Wright (eds), Bureaucratic Elites in Western European States (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B. and J. Pierre (eds), Politicians, Bureaucrats and Administrative Reform (London: Routledge, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B. and J. Pierre, Multi-Level Governance: A Faustian Bargain? In I. Bache and M. Flinders (eds), Multi-Level Governance (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004), pp. 75–89.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C. and G. Bouckaert, Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rometsch, D. and W. Wessels (eds), The European Union and Member States (Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F., ‘Regieren im europäischen Mehrebenensystem. Ansatze zu einer Theorie’, Leviathan, Vol. 30 (2002), 65–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steen, T., C. van den Berg, F.M. Van der Meer, P. Overeem and Th.A.J. Toonen, Modernising Governments in Other Countries: International Comparison of Change Processes in Central Government (The Hague, Netherlands, Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Terry, L., ‘The Thinning of Administrative Institutions in the Hollow State’, Administration and Society, 37 (2005), 426–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toonen, Th.A.J., The Comparative Dimension of Administrative Reform: Creating Open Villages and Redesigning the Politics of Administration. In B.G. Peters and J. Pierre (eds), Politicians, Bureaucrats and Administrative Reform: the Changing Balance (London: Routledge, 2001), pp. 183–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toonen, Th.A.J. and F.M. Van der Meer, Territory and Bureaucracy. In M. Burgess and J. Vollaard (eds), State, Territoriality and European Integration (London: Routledge, 2006), pp. 71–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trondal, J., C.F. van den Berg and S. Suvarierol, Tensions of Governance in the European Commission, Centre for European Studies Working paper no. 3, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Berg, C.F. and S. Suvarierol, ‘Bridges between the European Commission and the Member States: Seconded National Experts’, Journal of European Integration (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Meer, F.M., Civil Service Reform and the Rise of the Enabling State, conference paper, Paul van Riper Symposium at ASPA Conference, Phoenix, Arizona (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • van Thiel, S., ‘Trends in the Public Sector: Explaining the Increased Use of Quasi-Autonomous Bodies in Policy Implementation’, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 16 (2005), 175–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walgrave, S., P. Dumont and F. Varone, ‘Policy With or Without Parties? A Comparative Analysis of Policy Change and Stability in Belgium (1991–2000)’, Journal of European Public Policy, 13 (2006), 1039–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wessels, W., A. Maurer and J. Mittag (eds), Fifteen into One? The European Union and Member States (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2007 Caspar F. van den Berg and Theo A.J. Toonen

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van den Berg, C.F., Toonen, T.A.J. (2007). National Civil Service Systems and the Implications of Multi-level Governance: Weberianism Revisited?. In: Raadschelders, J.C.N., Toonen, T.A.J., Van der Meer, F.M. (eds) The Civil Service in the 21st Century. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230593084_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics