Skip to main content

Part of the book series: New Perspectives in German Studies ((NPG))

  • 126 Accesses

Abstract

Chapter 2 discussed the neue Unbefangenheit associated with the start of Schröder’s SPD-Green government and the debate on Martin Walser’s Peace Prize speech as evidence of challenges both to conventional thinking on the National Socialist past and the existence of the dialectic of normality. This chapter will assess the climate of the discourse at the end of the first term of the SPD-Green coalition in 2002. It is first useful to revisit the ideas of Schröder and Walser. On 8 May 2002, both took part in a public debate in Berlin on the subject of ‘Nation, Patriotism and Democratic Culture’. This debate reconfirmed some of the tendencies outlined thus far: Schröder standing for a neue Unbefangenheit but also Leitverantwortung based on cultural memory of the Nazi past and Walser defending a personal interpretation of this past. Somewhat controversially, the 8 May commemoration was used as an occasion for the SPD to present a positive national narrative, echoing some of the sentiments used by the CDU during the Nationalstolz debate and thereby offering further evidence of the blurring of the conventional distinction between left-wing and right-wing uses of Geschichtspolitik.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Rensmann cited a 1994 US publication according to which 39 per cent of Germans thought that Jews manipulated the Holocaust for their own purposes; a 1999 book on xenophobia which stated that in 1998 up to 50 per cent of Germans thought that Jews were trying to make them pay for the past; and a 1998 Forsa survey according to which 63 per cent of Germans thought a line should be drawn under the debate on Jewish persecution. See Lars Rensmann (2001) ‘Entschädigungspolitik, Erinnerungsabwehr und Motive des sekundären Antisemitismus, in Petra Steinberger (ed.) Die Finkelstein-Debatte (München: Piper Verlag), 126–54

    Google Scholar 

  2. A German research project on the transmission of memory of the National Socialist past within families also concluded that at this level Germans are commonly portrayed as victims rather than perpetrators. See Sabine Moller, Karoline Tschuggnall and Harald Welzer (2005) “Opa war kein Nazi”. Nationalsozialismus und Holocaust im Familiengedächtnis (Frankfurt am Main: Fischer).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2008 Caroline Pearce

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pearce, C. (2008). The ‘Anti-Semitism Dispute’. In: Contemporary Germany and the Nazi Legacy. New Perspectives in German Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230591226_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics