Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Continent, 1870–1938

  • Chapter
Means and Ends

  • 63 Accesses

Abstract

The state of Continental Europe between the nineteenth and the twentieth centuries with regard to its economic, political and intellectual history had many different facets. Germany, in 1870, was unified under the Prussian crown, and started out on the path of the Second Industrial Revolution with great success. Austria, by contrast, was losing its political importance (especially after the Ausgleich in 1867, when it was left as a dual monarchy) and was becoming resigned to remain on the fringes of the industrialization process. From the intellectual standpoint, the economic culture of the Central European elites had developed from an ideological current that had been a long time in the making; its roots lay in the Spain of the Habsburgs (after all, the last emperor of the dynasty — a Habsburg-Lothringen — was deposed in Vienna in 1918).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. S. Fenoaltea’s ‘liberalist’ re-interpretation in L’economia italiana dall’Unità alla Grande Guerra (Rome and Bari: Laterza, 2006), according to which the performance of the Italian economy was largely unrelated to the economic policies of the governments, does not seem convincing.

    Google Scholar 

  2. W. Sombart, Der proletarische Sozialismus: ‘Marxismus’ (Jena: Fischer, 1924).

    Google Scholar 

  3. W. Sombart, A New Social Philosophy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1937 [1934]), p. 77.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Gerschenkron, Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective: A Book of Essays (Cambridge MA: Belknap Press, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  5. F.A. Hayek, The Road to Serfdom (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1976 [1944]), p. 125.

    Google Scholar 

  6. For example, G. Schmoller, Grundriss der allgemeinen Wolkswirtschaftslehre, vol. II (Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot, 1904), p. 204.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ibid., p. 179. For the concept of the entrepreneur as being peculiar to the Continent, see G. Berta, L’imprenditore: un enigma tra economia e storia (Venice: Marsilio, 2004), especially pp. 47ff.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cf. E. Kauder, ‘Intellectual and Political Roots of the Older Austrian School’, Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie, 17.4 (1957), pp. 411–425;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. M.N. Rothbard, ‘New Light on the Prehistory of the Austrian School’, in E.G. Dolan (ed.), The Foundations of Modern Austrian Economics (Kansas City: Sheed and Ward, 1976), pp. 52–74;

    Google Scholar 

  10. A.M. Diamond, ‘The Austrian Economists and the Late Hapsburg Viennese Milieu’, Review of Austrian Economics, 2.1 (1988), pp. 157–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. See K. Hennings, The Austrian Theory of Value and Capital: Studies in the Life and Work of Eugen Böhm-Bawerk, ed. by H. Kurz (Cheltenham: Elgar, 1997), ch. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  12. The following edition is being used: E. Böhm-Bawerk, Capital and Interest (South Holland IL: Libertarian Press, 1959); vol. I: History and Critique of Interest Theories [1884]; vol. II, Positive Theory of Capital [1889].

    Google Scholar 

  13. E. Böhm-Bawerk, Karl Marx and the Close of His System, ed. with an introd. by P.M. Sweezy (Clifton NJ: Kelley, 1973), pp. 64ff.

    Google Scholar 

  14. C. Menger, Principles of Economics (New York: New York University Press, 1981 [1871]), p. 155.

    Google Scholar 

  15. C. Menger, ‘Zur Theorie des Kapitals’, Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, 17 (1888), pp. 1–49; here the more widely available (though abridged) French version is referred to: ‘Contribution à la théorie du capital’, Revue d’économie politique, 2 (1888), pp. 577–594.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J.A. Schumpeter, The Theory of Economic Development (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1934 [1911]).

    Google Scholar 

  17. L. Walras, Eléments d’économie politique pure, ou théorie de la richesse sociale [1874], in Oeuvres économiques complètes d’Auguste et Léon Walras, ed. by P. Dockès, vol. VIII (Paris: Economica, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  18. I. Fisher, The Nature of Capital and Income (New York: Macmillan, 1906); Id., The Rate of Interest (New York: Macmillan, 1907); Id., The Theory of Interest (New York: Macmillan, 1930).

    Google Scholar 

  19. K. Wicksell, Über Wert, Kapital, und Rente (Jena: Fischer, 1893); Id., Lectures on Political Economy, vol. I, General Theory (Kelley: New York, 1967 [1901]), pp. 172ff.; Id., ‘Böhm-Bawerk’s Theory of Capital’ [1911], in his Selected Papers on Economic Theory, ed. by E. Lindahl (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1958), pp. 176–185.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cf. K. Knies, Allgemeine (theoretische) Volkswirtschaftslehre [1886], ed. by T. Mizobata and H.-E. Caspary, The Kyoto University Economic Review, 69.1–2 (2000), ch. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  21. W. Sombart, ‘Zur Kritik des ökonomischen Systems von Karl Marx’, Archiv für soziale Gesetzgebung und Statistik, 7.4 (1894), pp. 555–594.

    Google Scholar 

  22. A. Cavalli, Introduzione to W. Sombart, Il capitalismo moderno (Turin: UTET, 1967), p. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  23. W. Sombart, Der Bourgeois. Zur Geistesgeschichte des modernen Wirtschaftsmenschen (Munich and Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot, 1923 [1913]), p. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  24. O. Spengler, Der Untergang des Abendlandes. Umrisse einer Morphologie der Weltgeschichte (Munich: DTV, 2006 [1918–1922]).

    Google Scholar 

  25. W. Sombart, Händler und Helden: patriotische Besinnungen (Munich and Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot, 1915).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ibid., p. 149. I have corrected the American edition with its erroneous translation of the expression ‘noch mehr aber die [Ideenwelt] des Liberalismus’ of the original text; cf. W. Sombart, Deutscher Sozialismus (Berlin: Buchholz & Weisswange, 1934), p. 164.

    Google Scholar 

  27. C. Schmitt, Der Leviathan in der Staatslehre des Thomas Hobbes: Sinn und Fehlschlag eines politischen Symbols (Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 1995 [1938]).

    Google Scholar 

  28. R. Faucci, L’economia politica in Italia: dal Cinquecento ai nostri giorni (Turin: UTET, 2000), pp. 221–224.

    Google Scholar 

  29. See also G. Tusset, La teoria dinamica nel pensiero economico italiano 1890–1940 (Florence: Polistampa, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  30. This continuity, which would culminate in the work of a great heterodox economist, Giovanni Demaria (1899–1998), is accounted for in the impressive reconstruction of H. Bartoli, Histoire de la pensée économique en Italie (Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  31. C. Cattaneo, Del pensiero come principio d’economia publica [1861], in Id., Scritti economici, ed. by A. Bertolino (Florence: Le Monnier, 1956), vol. III.

    Google Scholar 

  32. G. Del Vecchio, Lezioni di economia applicata, vol. I, Dinamica economica (Padua: CEDAM, 1933), p. 39.

    Google Scholar 

  33. See N. Bellanca, Economia politica e marxismo in Italia: problemi teorici e nodi storiografici 1880–1960 (Milan: Unicopli, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  34. A good overview is given by R. Faucci and S. Perri, ‘Achille Loria: His Vision and Economic Analysis’, in W.J. Samuels (ed.), European Economists of the Early 20th Century, vol. II, Studies of Neglected Continental Thinkers of Germany and Italy (Cheltenham: Elgar, 2003), pp. 203–238.

    Google Scholar 

  35. See, in particular, A. Loria, Analisi della proprietà capitalista (Turin: Bocca, 1889), and Id., La proprietà fondiaria e la questione sociale (Padua: Drucker, 1897).

    Google Scholar 

  36. See R. Patalano, ‘La teoria della terra libera di Achille Loria e la questione agraria in Italia 1889–1898’, Il pensiero economico italiano, 7.2 (1999), pp. 31–71.

    Google Scholar 

  37. C. Ottaviano, ‘Quando l’Italia esportava idee: la diffusione degli scritti di Achille Loria fra gli intellettuali americani’, Annali della Fondazione Luigi Einaudi, 15 (1981), pp. 281–321.

    Google Scholar 

  38. With regard to his biographical profile see P. Maurandi, Il caso Graziadei: vita politica e teoria economica di un intellettuale scomodo (Rome: Carocci, 1999). Several works of Graziadei are collected in Scritti scelti di economia, ed. by M. Ridolfi (Turin: UTET, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  39. A. Graziadei, ‘Il capitale tecnico e la teoria classico-socialista del valore’ [1895], ed. by M. Gallegati, Quaderni di storia dell’economia politica, 2 (1983), pp. 147–173.

    Google Scholar 

  40. See P. Cauwès, Précis du Cours d’Economie politique, professé à la Faculté de Droit de Paris. Contenant, avec l’exposé des principes, l’analyse des questions de législation économique (Paris: Larose, 1879).

    Google Scholar 

  41. C. Rist, ‘Obituary: Charles Gide’, Economic Journal, 42.2 (1932), p. 335.

    Google Scholar 

  42. C. Gide, Principes d’économie politique (Paris: L’Harmattan, 2000 [1883]).

    Google Scholar 

  43. E. Antonelli, ‘Recent Tendencies in French Theoretical Economics’, Journal of Political Economy, 31.4 (1923), p. 562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. For an overall view, see A. Gueslin, L’invention de l’économie sociale: le XIXe siècle français (Paris: Economica, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  45. F. Tönnies, Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundbegriffe der reinen Soziologie (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 2005 [1887]).

    Google Scholar 

  46. E. Durkheim, De la division du travail social (Paris: PUF, 2004 [1893]).

    Google Scholar 

  47. L. Frobert, Le travail de François Simiand 1873–1935 (Paris: Economica, 2000);

    Google Scholar 

  48. see also L. Gillard and M. Rosier (eds), François Simiand 1873–1935: sociologie, histoire, économie (Amsterdam: Editions des Archives Contemporaines, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  49. P. Burke, The French Historical Revolution: The Annales School 1929–89 (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1990), pp. 16ff.

    Google Scholar 

  50. F. Perroux, Le problème du profit (Paris: Giard, 1926). In it, Perroux concluded that Marxian theory had ‘the important merit of making one think’. But, whereas the idea of surplus value had ‘a true explicative value’, its empirical bases were less certain (ibid., pp. 366–367). A study of the facts ‘communicates to anyone who has a desire for justice a feeling of uneasiness which, in itself, is not without its use’, calling for ‘that particular form of intellectual humility which is moderation’ (ibid., pp. 544–545).

    Google Scholar 

  51. For a general overview of the author see R. Molesti (ed.), Giuseppe Toniolo: il pensiero e l’opera (Milan: Angeli, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  52. G. Toniolo, Trattato di economia sociale, vol. II, La produzione (Florence: Libreria Editrice Fiorentina, 1909), p. 33.

    Google Scholar 

  53. J.A. Hobson, Imperialism: A Study (London: Unwin Hyman, 1988 [1902]).

    Google Scholar 

  54. R. Luxemburg, The Accumulation of Capital, with an introd. by J. Robinson (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1951 [1913]), p. 417.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Cf. the balanced analysis of P. Bairoch, Victoires et déboires: histoire économique et sociale du monde du XVIe siècle à nos jours (Paris: Gallimard, 1997), vol. II, pp. 675ff.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Regarding the Russian agrarian economist A.V. Chayanov (1888–1939) see his anthology, The Theory of Peasant Economy, ed. by D. Thorner, B. Kerblay and R.E.F. Smith (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  57. R. Hilferding, Finance Capital: A Study of the Latest Phase of Capitalist Development, ed. with an introd. by T. Bottomore (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1981 [1910]), p. 366.

    Google Scholar 

  58. V.I. Lenin, Imperializm, kak vysshaya stadiya kapitalizma (Populyarnyy ocherk) [1917], in Id., Polnoe sobranie sochineniy, vol. 27 (Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo politicheskoy literatury, 1962);

    Google Scholar 

  59. P.A. Baran and P.M. Sweezy, Monopoly Capital: An Essay on the American Economic and Social Order (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  60. J.A. Schumpeter, ‘Zur Soziologie der Imperialismen’, Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik, 46 (1918/1919), pp. 1–39, 275–310; Id., Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (London: Unwin Paperbacks, 1987 [1942]).

    Google Scholar 

  61. N.I. Bucharin, Imperializm i nakoplenie kapitala (Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe izd-vo, 1928 [1924–1925]).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Francesco Boldizzoni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Copyright information

© 2008 Francesco Boldizzoni

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Boldizzoni, F. (2008). The Continent, 1870–1938. In: Means and Ends. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230584143_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230584143_8

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-36432-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-230-58414-3

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation