Abstract
The concept of civil society is open to diverse interpretations, which undoubtedly explains much of its popularity since the 1980s.1 It has appeared in such contexts as the criticism levelled against dictatorships in Latin America, the neoliberal critique of the welfare state, the antineoliberal critique of globalization, the communitarian critique of individualized modern societies, and the opposition to the Soviet-type system and the construction of democracies in Eastern and East-Central Europe. In addition to its importance in the contemporary social scientific repertoire, it has a rich history in a variety of different traditions (Keane (ed.) 1988 and Cohen and Arato 1992 are only two examples from the enormous literature on the subject).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aarelaid, Airi. 1996. ‘Kodanikualgatus, seltsid ja tsiviiliühiskond’, in Airi Aarelaid (ed.), pp. 9–16.
Aarelaid, Airi (ed.), 1996. Kodanikualgatus ja seltsid Eesti muutuval kultuurimaastikul. Tallinn: Jaan Tõnissoni Instituuti Kirjastus.
Aarelaid-Tart, Airi and Martti Siisiäinen. 1993. ‘Voluntary Associations in Estonia and in Finland from the Nineteenth Century to the Present Time’. Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences. Humanities and Social Sciences 42 (2): 215–31.
Alapuro, Risto. 1993. ‘Civil Society in Russia?’. In The Future of the Nation State in Europe, ed. Jyrki Iivonen. Aldershot: Edward Elgar, pp. 194–218.
Alapuro, Risto. 2003. ‘Estonian Views of Collective Action and Democracy’. Journal of Baltic Studies 34: 457–69.
Basina, Elena. 1997. ‘Krivoe zerkalo Evropy’.Pro et Contra 2(4): 92–112.
Belokurova, E.V. 2001. ‘Kontseptsiia grazhdanskogo obshchestva v rossiiskom prochtenii: obzor publikatsii poslednikh let’. In Grazhdane i vlast’: problemy I podkhody, ed. G. M. Mikhaileva and S. I. Ryzhenkov. Studia Politica 5. Moscow and St Petersburg, pp. 28–47.
Belokurova, Elena and Natal’ia Iargomskaia. 2005. ‘Do i posle Grazhdanskogo foruma: grazhdanskoe obshchestvo v regionakh Severo-Zapada’. In Grazhdanskoe obshchestvo i politicheskie protsessy v regionakh. Moscow: Moskovskii tsentr Karnegi, pp. 23–37.
Berg, Eiki. 1999. Estonia’s Northeastern Periphery in Politics: Socio-economic and Ethnic Dimensions. Dissertationes Geographicae Universitatis Tartuensis 7. Tartu: Tartu University Press.
Berg, Eiki and Allan Sikk. 2004. ‘Ethnic Claims and Local Politics in Northeastern Estonia’. In Beyond Post-Soviet Transition: Micro perspectives on Challenge and Survival in Russia and Estonia, ed. Risto Alapuro, Ilkka Liikanen and Markku Lonkila. Helsinki: Kikimora, pp. 165–87.
Cefaï, Daniel. 2001. ‘Expérience, culture et politique’. Cultures politiques, sous la direction de Daniel Cefaï. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, pp. 93–116.
Cohen, Jean and Andrew Arato. 1992. Civil Society and Political Theory. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Crowley, Stephen. 2002. ‘Comprehending the Weakness of Russia’s Unions’. Demokratizatsiya 10: 230–55.
Diligensky, German. 1997. ‘Chto my znaem o demokratii i grazhdanskom obshchestve?’ Pro et Contra 2 (4): 5–21.
Evans, Alfred B. Jr., Laura A. Henry and Lisa McIntosh Sundstrom (eds), 2006. Russian Civil Society: A Critical Assessment. Armonk NY: M. E. Sharpe.
Gadzhiev, K. 1994. Politicheskaia nauka. Moscow: Soros-Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia.
Gavra, Dimitri and Anna Gomosova. 2000. ‘Zivilgesellschaft in Russland–Das Beispiel St Petersburg: Erste Schritte in Theorie und Praxis’. In Russland auf dem Weg zur Zivilgesellschaft? Studien zur gesellschaftlichen Selbstorganisation in St Petersburg, ed. Heiko Schrader, Manfred Glagow, Dimitri Gavra and Michael Kleineberg. Osteuropa, vol. 26, pp. 32–49.
Gel’man, Vladimir. 2002. ‘Vvedenie’. In Gel’man, Sergei Ryzhenkov, Elena Belokurova and Nadezhda Borisova, Avtonomiia ili kontrol’? Reforma mestnoi vlasti v gorodakh Rossii, 1991–2001. St Petersburg/Moscow: Evropeiskii universitet v Sankt-Peterburge, pp. 13–34.
Golenkova, Zinaida T. 1999. ‘Civil Society in Russia’. Russian Social Science Review 40 (1): 4–18.
Grigoriev, Vitaliy. 2000. ‘The Russian Approach to Civil Society’. In Russland auf dem Weg zur Zivilgesellschaft? Studien zur gesellschaftlichen Selbstorganisation in St Petersburg, ed. Heiko Schrader, Manfred Glagow, Dimitri Gavra and Michael Kleineberg. Osteuropa, vol. 26, pp. 86–97.
Haamer, Valter. 2003. ‘Kodanikuühiskond: kellele, milleks’. Riigikogu toimetised 8 (http://www.riikikogu.ee/rva/toimetised/rito8/artiklid/25haamer.htm)
Hale, Henry E. 2002. ‘Civil Society from Above? Statist and Liberal Models of State-Building in Russia’. Demokratizatsiya 10: 306–21.
Heidmets, Mati and Marju Lauristin. 2002. ‘Learning from the Estonian Case’, in Marju Lauristin and Mati Heidmets (eds), pp. 319–32.
Henry, Laura A. 2002. ‘Two Paths to a Greener Future: Environmentalism and Civil Society Development in Russia’. Demokratizatsiya 10: 184–206.
Howard, Marc Morjé. 2003. The Weakness ofCivil Society in Post-CommunistEurope. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Høyer, Svennik, Epp Lauk and Peeter Vihalemm (eds), 1993. Towards Civic Society: The Baltic Media’s Long Road to Freedom. Perspectives on History, Ethnicity and Journalism. Tartu: Nota Baltica.
Informatsionnyi biulleten’, no. 1, 1992 [of the St Petersburg regional section of the movement ‘Demokraticheskaia Rossiia’]. St Petersburg: Dvizhenie ‘Demokraticheskaia Rossiia’, Sankt-Peterburgskoe regional’noe otdelenie.
Keane, John, (ed.), 1988. Civil Society and the State. London: Verso.
Kharichev, Igor’. 2001. ‘Grazhdanskoe obshchestvo v podarok’. Nezavisimaia gazeta, 13 September.
Kharkhordin, Oleg. 1997. ‘Proekt Dostoevskogo’. Pro et Contra 2 (4): 38–59.
Kharkhordin, Oleg. 2005. ‘Civil Society’. In Kharkhordin, Main Concepts ofRussian Politics. Lanham MD: University Press of America, pp. 41–65.
Khlopin, Aleksandr. 1997a. ‘Grazhdanskoe obshchestvo ili sotsium klik: rossiiskaia dilemma’. Politiia 1: 7–27.
Khlopin, Aleksandr. 1997b. ‘Stanovlenie grazhdanskogo obshchestva v Rossii: institutsional’naia perspektiva’. Pro et Contra 2 (4): 60–76.
Kivirähk, Juhan. 2004. ‘Kas kodanikuühiskond on moes?’ Postimees, 19 February.
Kocka, Jürgen. 2000. ‘Zivilgesellschaft als historisches Problem und Versprechen’. In Europäische Zivilgesellschaft in Ost und West. Begriff, Geschichte, Chancen, ed. Manfred Hildermeier, Jürgen Kocka and Christoph Conrad. Frankfurt/New York: Campus Verlag, pp. 13–39.
Kocka, Jürgen. 2004. ‘Civil Society from a Historical Perspective’. European Review 12 (1): 65–79.
Kofanova. E. 1991. ‘O proekte programmy SDPR’. Politicheskie issledovaniia 1 (1): 208–10.
Krivosheev, V. T. 2004. ‘Sotsial’noe partnerstvo i korporativizm: rossiiskaiia spetsifika’. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia 31 (6): 38–44.
Lagerspetz, Mikko. 2000. ‘Kodanikeühiskonna rollid tänases Eestis’. Riigikogu Toimetised 2.
Lagerspetz, Mikko. 2001. ‘Estonian NGOs as Civil Society?’ Paper presented to the Fifth Conference of the European Sociological Association, August 28– September 1, 2001, Helsinki, Finland.
Lagerspetz, Mikko. 2004. Kodanikuühiskonna lühisônastik. Tallinn: Eesti Mittetulundusühenduste Ümarlaud.
Lagerspetz, Mikko, Erle Rikmann and Rein Ruutsoo. 2002. ‘The Structure and Resources of NGOs in Estonia’. Voluntas 13: 73–87.
Lagerspetz, Mikko, Aire Trummal, Rein Ruutsoo, Erle Rikmann and Daimar Liiv. 2003. Tuntud ja tundmatu kodanikeühiskond. Tallinn: Avatud Eesti Fond.
Lauristin, Marju and Mati Heidmets. 2002. ‘Introduction: The Russian Minority in Estonia as a Theoretical and Political Issue’, in Marju Lauristin and Mati Heidmets (eds), pp. 19–29.
Lauristin, Marju and Mati Heidmets (eds), 2002. The Challenge of the Russian Minority: Emerging Multicultural Democracy in Estonia. Tartu: Tartu University Press.
Lauristin, Marju and Peeter Vihalemm. 1993. ‘The Balts–West of the East, East of the West’, in Høyer, Lauk and Vihalemm (eds), pp. 13–40.
Lauristin, Marju and Peeter Vihalemm with Karl Erik Rosengren and Lennart Weibull (eds), 1997. Return to the Western World: Cultural and Political Perspectives on the Estonian Post-Communist Transition. Tartu: Tartu University Press.
Liborakina, Marina, Mikhail Fliamer and Vladimir Yakimets. 1996. Sotsial’noe partnerstvo. Zametki o formirovanii grazhdanskogo obshchestva v Rossii. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo’Shkola kul’turnoi politiki’.
Linz, Juan J. and Alfred Stepan. 1996. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Maksimenko, V. 1999. ‘Ideologema civil society i grazhdanskaia kul’tura’. Pro et Contra 4 (1): 113–28.
Model’, I. M. and B. S. Model’. 2000. ‘Sotsial’noe partnerstvo v Rossii’. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia 27 (9): 42–9.
Nikitin, Alexander and Jane Buchanan. 2002. ‘The Kremlin’s Civic Forum: Cooperation or Co-optation for Civil Society in Russia?’ Demokratizatsiya 10: 147–65.
Offe, Claus. 1995. ‘Some Skeptical Considerations on the Malleability of Representative Institutions’. In Associations and Democracy, ed. Erik Olin Wright. London: Verso, pp. 114–32.
Offerlé, Michel. 2003. ‘Avant-propos’. La société civile en question, dossier réalisé par Michel Offerlé. Paris: La Documentation Française, pp. 5–12.
Otchet o rezul’tatakh vypolneniia nauchno-issledovatel’skikh rabot i nauchnoorganizatsionnoi deiatel’nosti instituta za 1990 god. 1990. Moscow: Akademiia Nauk SSSR, Institut Sotsiologii, pp. 31–2.
Petrov, Nikolai. 2005. ‘Vstupitel’noe slovo’. In Grazhdanskoe obshchestvo i politich-eskie protsessy v regionakh. Moscow: Moskovskii tsentr Karnegi, pp. 5–8.
Pipes, Richard. 1974. Russia under the Old Regime. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
Politicheskaia sotsiologiia dlia studentov vyzov, ed. G. P. Sopov. 2001. Rostov-onDon: Feniks.
Pursiainen, Christer. Forthcoming 2008. ‘The Development of Civil Society–State Relations in Russia’. In Good Governance and the Administrative Reform: Towards a New Contract of the State, Business, and Civil Society in Russia, ed. S. Medvedev. Moscow: RECEP.
Pursiainen, Christer and Heikki Patomäki. 2004. ‘The State and Society in Russia’. In Contemporary Change in Russia: In from the Margins?, ed. Egle Rindzeviciute. Huddinge: Baltic and East European Graduate School, Södertörns högskola, pp. 55–93.
Raik, Kristi. 2003. Democratic Politics or the Implementation of Inevitabilities? Estonia’s Democracy and Integration into the European Union. Tartu: Tartu University Press.
Rikmann, Erle. 2003. ‘Kansalaisosallistumisen kulttuuri Virossa’. Idilntutkimus 10 (1): 3–14.
Rikmann, Erle, Meril Ümarik, Sofia Joons and Mikko Lagerspetz. 2005. Kodanikualgatuse institutsionaliseerumine Eestis: organiseerumisestruktuur ja ressursid. Tallinn: Tallinna Ülikooli Eesti Humanitaarinstituut.
Rossiia segodnia. Politicheskii portret v dokumentakh 1985–1991. 1991. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia.
Ruutsoo, Rein. 2001. ‘Kodaniku taassünd’. Eesti Pilevaleht, 21 August.
Ruutsoo, Rein. 2002a. Civil Society and Nation Building in Estonia and the Baltic States: Impact of Traditions on Mobilization and Transition 1986–2000: Historical and Sociological Study. Rovaniemi: University of Lapland.
Ruutsoo, Rein. 2002b. ‘Discursive Conflict and Estonian Post-Communist Nation-Building’, in Marju Lauristin and Mati Heidmets (eds), pp. 31–54.
Ruutsoo, Rein, Erle Rikmann and Mikko Lagerspetz. 2003. ‘Süvenev keskustelu: Eesti ühiskonna valmisolek kodanikualgatuse arendamiseks’. In Mikko Lagerspetz, Aire Trummal, Rein Ruutsoo, Erle Rikmann and Daimar Liiv. 2003. Tuntud ja tundmatu kodanikeühiskond. Tallinn: Avatud Eesti Fond, pp. 46–81.
Taylor, Charles. 1990. ‘Modes of Civil Society’. Public Culture 3 (1): 95–118.
Tilly, Charles. 1975. ‘Western State-Making and Theories of Political Transformation’. In The Formation of National States in Western Europe, ed. Charles Tilly. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 601–38.
Volkov, Vadim. 1997. ‘Obshchestvennost’: zabytaia praktika grazhdanskogo obshchestva’. Pro et Contra 2 (4): 77–91.
Zdravomyslova, Jelena. 2005. ‘Venäjän kansalaisjärjestöt ja kansalaisaktiivisuus Venäjällä’. In Kansalaisyhteiskunta liikkeessä yli rajojen, ed. Airi Leppänen. Helsinki: Palmenia-kustannus, pp. 204–14.
Zubov, Andrei. 1997. ‘Sovremennoe russkoe obshchestvo i civil society: granitsy nalozheniia’. Pro et Contra 2 (4): 22–37.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2008 Risto Alapuro
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Alapuro, R. (2008). Russian and Estonian Civil Society Discourses Compared. In: White, S. (eds) Media, Culture and Society in Putin’s Russia. Studies in Central and Eastern Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230583078_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230583078_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-35730-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-58307-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)