Abstract
The theoretical analysis of money as the universal equivalent in the opening chapters of Capital is a highly distinctive aspect of Marx’s theory of value. Neither classical political economy nor neoclassical economics offers a comparable analysis of the relationship between value and money. In Capital (and elsewhere, selectively cited below) Marx defines money as the universal equivalent, or the independent form of value. By representing value in general, money allows the value of particular commodities (abstract labour-time) to be expressed as price in capitalist markets. This much is common ground within the Marxist theory of money. However, there is far less clarity on the specific economic content of money as the universal equivalent, especially the relationship between value representation and money’s unique ability to buy. Similarly, there is no established understanding of the economic process through which the universal equivalent emerges in commodity exchange.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Clower, Robert (1967), ‘A reconsideration of the microfoundations of monetary theory’, Western Economic Journal, 6(4), 1–8.
Fine, Ben and Laurence Harris (1979), Rereading Capital (New York: Columbia University Press).
Itoh, Makoto (1976), ‘A study of Marx’s theory of value’, Science and Society, 40(3), 307–40.
Jevons, William Stanley (1875), Money and the Mechanism of Exchange (London: Appleton).
Lapavitsas, Costas (1991), ‘The theory of credit money: A structural analysis’, Science and Society, 55(3), 291–322.
Lapavitsas, Costas (2002), ‘The Emergence of Money in Commodity Exchange, Or Money as Monopolist of the Ability to Buy’ (London: School of Oriental and African Studies Discussion Paper).
Lapavitsas, Costas (2003), Social Foundations of Markets, Money and Credit (London and New York: Routledge).
Marx, Karl (1859), Contribution to a Critique of Political Economy (Moscow: Progress, 1970).
Marx, Karl (1867), Das Kapital, Band I, English translation by Ben Fowkes of the 4th edn (1894), Capital, Volume I (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1976).
Marx, Karl (1894) Das Kapital, Band III, English translation by Ben Fowkes of the 4th edn (1894), Capital, Volume III (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1981).
Marx, Karl (1939), Grundrisse (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1973).
Sekine, Tomohiko (1999), ‘Marxian theory of value: An unoist approach’, Chiiki Bunseki, Aichi Gakuin, 37(2), 99–136.
Simmel, Georg (1900), The Philosophy of Money (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1978).
Smith, Adam (1776), The Wealth of Nations, E. Cannan (ed.), Vols I, II (London: Methuen, 1904).
Weeks, John (1981), Capital and Exploitation (London: Edward Arnold).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2005 Costas Lapavitsas
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lapavitsas, C. (2005). The Universal Equivalent as Monopolist of the Ability to Buy. In: Moseley, F. (eds) Marx’s Theory of Money. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230523999_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230523999_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-51857-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-52399-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)